Comments on: Dirty Work http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/ Development site for Bronx Banter Blog's upcoming look and feel Wed, 22 May 2013 02:03:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Knuckles http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46280 Knuckles Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:25:02 +0000 http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46280 <p><b><a name="4" rel="nofollow"></a>4.</b>  The Times has the blandest, weakest sports section in the area, and it's only gotten more unreadable since they started pumping the Sox. Every article you read on MSN, CNN, ESPN, Slate, etc. all have disclaimers about which subjects of the column are related to the media outlet- maybe the Times should start doing the same every time they run a lame-ass puff piece on someone like Kevin Millar during spring training.</p> <p> As for a new Stadium, NY should realize that they may actually be lucky because George can write off the building costs and save some money. Otherwise he'd be starting a bidding war for public financing between NYC and North Jersey. Keep the team in the Bronx, the team pays for the stadium, and George gets to drop his revenue sharing contribs- everyone with a interest in the city and the Yankees wins. </p> 4.  The Times has the blandest, weakest sports section in the area, and it’s only gotten more unreadable since they started pumping the Sox. Every article you read on MSN, CNN, ESPN, Slate, etc. all have disclaimers about which subjects of the column are related to the media outlet- maybe the Times should start doing the same every time they run a lame-ass puff piece on someone like Kevin Millar during spring training.

As for a new Stadium, NY should realize that they may actually be lucky because George can write off the building costs and save some money. Otherwise he’d be starting a bidding war for public financing between NYC and North Jersey. Keep the team in the Bronx, the team pays for the stadium, and George gets to drop his revenue sharing contribs- everyone with a interest in the city and the Yankees wins.

]]> By: KJC http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46279 KJC Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:17:09 +0000 http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46279 <p><b><a name="3" rel="nofollow"></a>3.</b>  "Does the New York Times have it in for the Yankees?"</p> <p> I think we came to the conclusion last year that the answer to that question was "absolutely, yes." (We also made it official that Dan Shaunessy sucks, although that's been known for years...) </p> 3.  ”Does the New York Times have it in for the Yankees?”

I think we came to the conclusion last year that the answer to that question was “absolutely, yes.” (We also made it official that Dan Shaunessy sucks, although that’s been known for years…)

]]> By: Ryan http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46278 Ryan Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:02:51 +0000 http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46278 <p><b><a name="2" rel="nofollow"></a>2.</b>  Why is it the job of the Yankees to "build affordable housing, schools and retail space in the area." What an effing joke. </p> 2.  Why is it the job of the Yankees to “build affordable housing, schools and retail space in the area.” What an effing joke.

]]> By: jkay http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46277 jkay Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:58:32 +0000 http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/03/30/dirty-work/#comment-46277 <p><b><a name="1" rel="nofollow"></a>1.</b>  The Times has gone overboard with their Sox coverage. Their sports section has sucked for many years. They sucked big time even before they had a Sox affiliation. </p> 1.  The Times has gone overboard with their Sox coverage. Their sports section has sucked for many years. They sucked big time even before they had a Sox affiliation.

]]>