<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Royals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:03:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: randym77</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53166</link>
		<dc:creator>randym77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53166</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;77&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;77.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Getting an outfielder is good. Dunno about moving Matsui to center. Didn&#039;t they try that before?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="77" rel="nofollow"></a>77.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Getting an outfielder is good. Dunno about moving Matsui to center. Didn&#8217;t they try that before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameson and water</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53165</link>
		<dc:creator>jameson and water</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;76&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;76.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Lawton, eh? This is good.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="76" rel="nofollow"></a>76.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Lawton, eh? This is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkay</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53164</link>
		<dc:creator>jkay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53164</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;75&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;75.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Now playing left field....Matt Lawton!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hitdecki moves to CF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Cashman strikes again.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="75" rel="nofollow"></a>75.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Now playing left field&#8230;.Matt Lawton!</p>
<p>
Hitdecki moves to CF.</p>
<p>
Cashman strikes again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singledd</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53163</link>
		<dc:creator>singledd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53163</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;74&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;74.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Hey Cliff,&lt;br /&gt;
I was only kidding about the &#039;bragging again&#039; comment. There is no question that your baseball acumen is quite high, and that your joining forces with AB has helped to create one of the best baseball blogs in Netdom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We here always like to lament on who &#039;got away&#039;, although upon careful study, I don&#039;t think we have done that badly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Javier Carlos Vazquez: $11,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
REC 10-13 &#124; SV 0 &#124; ERA 4.59 &#124; WHIP 1.24&lt;br /&gt;
And this is in the NL, where I think for pitchers you have to increase numbers 10% or so to compare performance to the AL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For us, it&#039;s not that Javy, El Duque and Contraras have done that well, as much as how poorly our &#039;big 3&#039; acquisitions have done.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Would it be an interesting read (oh Cliffy) to look back on who we let get away in the last 2 years and see how they are doing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And lastly, I am looking at ARod vs &#039;Manny the Clown&#039; numbers this year. While I am very glad we have ARod, I&#039;m REALLY glad the Sox did not get him. While ARod is not a pull hitter, I can&#039;t help think he would be playing ping-pong off the Green Monster if he played in Fenway. Where might ARod&#039;s numbers be if he played in Fenway and not the Stadium?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="74" rel="nofollow"></a>74.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Hey Cliff,<br />
I was only kidding about the &#8216;bragging again&#8217; comment. There is no question that your baseball acumen is quite high, and that your joining forces with AB has helped to create one of the best baseball blogs in Netdom.</p>
<p>
We here always like to lament on who &#8216;got away&#8217;, although upon careful study, I don&#8217;t think we have done that badly.</p>
<p>
Javier Carlos Vazquez: $11,000,000<br />
REC 10-13 | SV 0 | ERA 4.59 | WHIP 1.24<br />
And this is in the NL, where I think for pitchers you have to increase numbers 10% or so to compare performance to the AL.</p>
<p>
For us, it&#8217;s not that Javy, El Duque and Contraras have done that well, as much as how poorly our &#8216;big 3&#8242; acquisitions have done.</p>
<p>
Would it be an interesting read (oh Cliffy) to look back on who we let get away in the last 2 years and see how they are doing?</p>
<p>
And lastly, I am looking at ARod vs &#8216;Manny the Clown&#8217; numbers this year. While I am very glad we have ARod, I&#8217;m REALLY glad the Sox did not get him. While ARod is not a pull hitter, I can&#8217;t help think he would be playing ping-pong off the Green Monster if he played in Fenway. Where might ARod&#8217;s numbers be if he played in Fenway and not the Stadium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brockdc</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53162</link>
		<dc:creator>brockdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 03:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;73&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;73.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Mike, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For whatever it&#039;s worth, that&#039;s the post of the day.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="73" rel="nofollow"></a>73.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Mike, </p>
<p>
For whatever it&#8217;s worth, that&#8217;s the post of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53161</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;72&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;72.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Just to be a jerk, baseball uniforms had collars before they didn&#039;t, check the original 1869 Red Stockings:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/exhibits/online_exhibits/dressed_to_the_nines/pictures/stockings_red.jpg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Otherwise, I share you dislike of current unform trends, but I don&#039;t think the Yankees deserve special treatment. Rather, I think the offending teams should clean up their unform schemes for all 162 games. I&#039;m especially upset with the Royals because they had such consistancy over the years (just one cap before they added the black), and because I can&#039;t stand the use of black as an accent color. If your team has black as a primary color (Pirates, Giants, even the Rockies) then fine, but otherwise (Mets, Rangers, Royals, Reds etc.) NO!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For more on this sort of thing, check out Paul Lukas on the side bar (under columnists).
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="72" rel="nofollow"></a>72.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Just to be a jerk, baseball uniforms had collars before they didn&#8217;t, check the original 1869 Red Stockings:<br />
<a href="http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/exhibits/online_exhibits/dressed_to_the_nines/pictures/stockings_red.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/exhibits/online_exhibits/dressed_to_the_nines/pictures/stockings_red.jpg</a></p>
<p>
Otherwise, I share you dislike of current unform trends, but I don&#8217;t think the Yankees deserve special treatment. Rather, I think the offending teams should clean up their unform schemes for all 162 games. I&#8217;m especially upset with the Royals because they had such consistancy over the years (just one cap before they added the black), and because I can&#8217;t stand the use of black as an accent color. If your team has black as a primary color (Pirates, Giants, even the Rockies) then fine, but otherwise (Mets, Rangers, Royals, Reds etc.) NO!!!</p>
<p>
For more on this sort of thing, check out Paul Lukas on the side bar (under columnists).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53160</link>
		<dc:creator>carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53160</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;71&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;71.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Mike- Can&#039;t agree with you more. Enough said.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="71" rel="nofollow"></a>71.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Mike- Can&#8217;t agree with you more. Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeplugh</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53159</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeplugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53159</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;70&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;70.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;I want to make a comment on the Royals uniforms today. This is not a knock on the Royals but rather an impression I have, personally, about a lot of teams that come into Yankee Stadium to play.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Royals wore their 3rd alternative, road, batting practice, reversible, rain-proof, stain resistant, limited edition, night vision uniform tops today. A lot of teams come to the Stadium with a few uniforms to showcase over 3 or 4 games. I hate it. Just my opinion, but I hate when they do this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It&#039;s not just that I really hate the 3 or 4 uniform/cap thing....which I do.....but more that a team would come into Yankee Stadium wearing it. You gotta be you, and if you wear your neon pink and green road uniforms every 3rd Sunday of the month then by all means.....but to me it&#039;s embarrassing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Fenway and Yankee Stadium are kind of baseball cathedrals. It&#039;s like living baseball history. I wish teams would come in to play us in their most traditional uniforms and match the Yankees&#039; reverence for the continuity of the game. It&#039;s just a personal pet peeve, but I wonder if anyone sees where I&#039;m coming from....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You can always show up in Toronto at the SkyDome and wear the caps with the propellers and the uniform tops with collars, but when you come to play in the House that Ruth Built, where the home team wears the same uniforms that Yankee teams have worn for almost a century (no names on the back), maybe it would mean something to your franchise to take a lesson and build a tradition of your own, starting with some uniform continuity. Damn the marketing profits. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Just my opinion....I could be wrong.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="70" rel="nofollow"></a>70.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;I want to make a comment on the Royals uniforms today. This is not a knock on the Royals but rather an impression I have, personally, about a lot of teams that come into Yankee Stadium to play.</p>
<p>
The Royals wore their 3rd alternative, road, batting practice, reversible, rain-proof, stain resistant, limited edition, night vision uniform tops today. A lot of teams come to the Stadium with a few uniforms to showcase over 3 or 4 games. I hate it. Just my opinion, but I hate when they do this.</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s not just that I really hate the 3 or 4 uniform/cap thing&#8230;.which I do&#8230;..but more that a team would come into Yankee Stadium wearing it. You gotta be you, and if you wear your neon pink and green road uniforms every 3rd Sunday of the month then by all means&#8230;..but to me it&#8217;s embarrassing.</p>
<p>
Fenway and Yankee Stadium are kind of baseball cathedrals. It&#8217;s like living baseball history. I wish teams would come in to play us in their most traditional uniforms and match the Yankees&#8217; reverence for the continuity of the game. It&#8217;s just a personal pet peeve, but I wonder if anyone sees where I&#8217;m coming from&#8230;.</p>
<p>
You can always show up in Toronto at the SkyDome and wear the caps with the propellers and the uniform tops with collars, but when you come to play in the House that Ruth Built, where the home team wears the same uniforms that Yankee teams have worn for almost a century (no names on the back), maybe it would mean something to your franchise to take a lesson and build a tradition of your own, starting with some uniform continuity. Damn the marketing profits. </p>
<p>
Just my opinion&#8230;.I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53158</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53158</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;69&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;69.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Luis Gonzalez . . . hmmmmmm.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="69" rel="nofollow"></a>69.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Luis Gonzalez . . . hmmmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53157</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;68&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;68.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Yeah, McGwire never hit for enough average to make that list. Here are his three best seasons:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&#039;97: .274-58-123 1.039&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;98: .299-70-147 1.222&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;99: .278-65-147 1.120&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
McGwire did hit .312 in 423AB in &#039;96, but he also fell short on RBIs that year:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&#039;96: .312-52-113 1.198&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
He never hit .300 in any other season of more than 236 AB (.305 in 236 AB in &#039;00)
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="68" rel="nofollow"></a>68.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Yeah, McGwire never hit for enough average to make that list. Here are his three best seasons:</p>
<p>
&#8217;97: .274-58-123 1.039<br />
&#8217;98: .299-70-147 1.222<br />
&#8217;99: .278-65-147 1.120</p>
<p>
McGwire did hit .312 in 423AB in &#8217;96, but he also fell short on RBIs that year:</p>
<p>
&#8217;96: .312-52-113 1.198</p>
<p>
He never hit .300 in any other season of more than 236 AB (.305 in 236 AB in &#8217;00)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeplugh</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53156</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeplugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;67&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;67.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;One of the amazing years on that list is George Foster in &#039;77. He hit .320 with 52 homers and 149 RBIs! That&#039;s in a year when he led the 2nd place hitters in HRs by 11 and RBIs by 19. He was 4th in average. To be that far ahead of the field in any given year is really a one in a million season.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Albert Belle stands out in 1995 and 1998. He put up unreal numbers year after year. He had a terrible temper and his body broke down on him early.....hmmmmm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Luis Gonzales in 2001 is sick. Fitting that he impacted the WS title in that year. Seriously sick.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Todd Helton and Larry Walker should be taken with a grain of salt. They are both terrific ballplayers but put them on any other team in any other city and they wouldn&#039;t be on this list. They&#039;d probably still be on some notable lists, but not this one.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="67" rel="nofollow"></a>67.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;One of the amazing years on that list is George Foster in &#8217;77. He hit .320 with 52 homers and 149 RBIs! That&#8217;s in a year when he led the 2nd place hitters in HRs by 11 and RBIs by 19. He was 4th in average. To be that far ahead of the field in any given year is really a one in a million season.</p>
<p>
Albert Belle stands out in 1995 and 1998. He put up unreal numbers year after year. He had a terrible temper and his body broke down on him early&#8230;..hmmmmm.</p>
<p>
Luis Gonzales in 2001 is sick. Fitting that he impacted the WS title in that year. Seriously sick.</p>
<p>
Todd Helton and Larry Walker should be taken with a grain of salt. They are both terrific ballplayers but put them on any other team in any other city and they wouldn&#8217;t be on this list. They&#8217;d probably still be on some notable lists, but not this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brockdc</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53155</link>
		<dc:creator>brockdc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53155</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;66&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;66.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;I just learned this recently, but apparently, in &#039;32, Foxx had two homers that weren&#039;t counted due to rainouts. Is this common knowledge? It sure as hell was news to me.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="66" rel="nofollow"></a>66.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;I just learned this recently, but apparently, in &#8217;32, Foxx had two homers that weren&#8217;t counted due to rainouts. Is this common knowledge? It sure as hell was news to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53154</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;65&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;65.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;&quot;Where did McGwire&#039;s best year fail that selection?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I assume it&#039;s because his BA was not usually that high. Did he ever bat .315+?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="65" rel="nofollow"></a>65.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8221;Where did McGwire&#8217;s best year fail that selection?&#8221;</p>
<p>
I assume it&#8217;s because his BA was not usually that high. Did he ever bat .315+?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singledd</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53153</link>
		<dc:creator>singledd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53153</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;64&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;64.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;sabernar... Thanks for that list. Great DB you have. Man.... some amazing numbers there. How do you get 175 RBI!
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="64" rel="nofollow"></a>64.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;sabernar&#8230; Thanks for that list. Great DB you have. Man&#8230;. some amazing numbers there. How do you get 175 RBI!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rilkefan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53152</link>
		<dc:creator>rilkefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;63&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;63.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Ted Kluszewski?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Where did McGwire&#039;s best year fail that selection?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Lot of Albert Belle, too...
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="63" rel="nofollow"></a>63.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Ted Kluszewski?</p>
<p>
Where did McGwire&#8217;s best year fail that selection?</p>
<p>
Lot of Albert Belle, too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabernar</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53151</link>
		<dc:creator>sabernar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;62&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;62.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;This is as best as I can do without become totally anal about it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
HOMERUNS......................YEAR......HR.......AVG......OPS......HR.......RBI&lt;br /&gt;
1....Barry.Bonds..............2001.......73......328....1.379.......73......137&lt;br /&gt;
2....Sammy.Sosa.............2001.......64......328....1.174.......64......160&lt;br /&gt;
3....Babe.Ruth................1927.......60......356....1.258.......60......164&lt;br /&gt;
4....Babe.Ruth................1921.......59......378....1.359.......59......171&lt;br /&gt;
T5...Jimmie.Foxx..............1932.......58......364....1.218.......58......169&lt;br /&gt;
T5...Hank.Greenberg........1938.......58......315....1.122.......58......146&lt;br /&gt;
7....Luis.Gonzalez............2001.......57......325....1.117.......57......142&lt;br /&gt;
8....Hack.Wilson..............1930.......56......356....1.177.......56......191&lt;br /&gt;
T9...Mickey.Mantle............1961.......54......317....1.135.......54......128&lt;br /&gt;
T9...Babe.Ruth................1928.......54......323....1.172.......54......142&lt;br /&gt;
T9...Babe.Ruth................1920.......54......376....1.379.......54......137&lt;br /&gt;
T12..George.Foster...........1977.......52......320....1.013.......52......149&lt;br /&gt;
T12..Mickey.Mantle............1956.......52......353....1.169.......52......130&lt;br /&gt;
T12..Alex.Rodriguez..........2001.......52......318....1.021.......52......135&lt;br /&gt;
15...Willie.Mays................1955.......51......319....1.059.......51......127&lt;br /&gt;
T16..Albert.Belle...............1995.......50......317....1.091.......50......126&lt;br /&gt;
T16..Sammy.Sosa.............2000.......50......320....1.040.......50......138&lt;br /&gt;
T16..Jimmie.Foxx..............1938.......50......349....1.166.......50......175&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Lou.Gehrig...............1936.......49......354....1.174.......49......152&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Albert.Belle...............1998.......49......328....1.055.......49......152&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Larry.Walker.............1997.......49......366....1.172.......49......130&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Ted.Kluszewski..........1954.......49......326....1.049.......49......141&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Lou.Gehrig...............1934.......49......363....1.172.......49......165&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Babe.Ruth................1930.......49......359....1.225.......49......153&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Todd.Helton..............2001.......49......336....1.116.......49......146&lt;br /&gt;
T19..Frank.Robinson.........1966.......49......316....1.047.......49......122&lt;br /&gt;
27...Jimmie.Foxx..............1933.......48......356....1.153.......48......163&lt;br /&gt;
T28..Lou.Gehrig...............1927.......47......373....1.240.......47......175&lt;br /&gt;
T28..Babe.Ruth................1926.......47......372....1.253.......47......146&lt;br /&gt;
T28..Rafael.Palmeiro..........1999.......47......324....1.050.......47......148&lt;br /&gt;
T31..Babe.Ruth................1929.......46......345....1.128.......46......154&lt;br /&gt;
T31..Babe.Ruth................1931.......46......373....1.194.......46......163&lt;br /&gt;
T31..Babe.Ruth................1924.......46......378....1.252.......46......121&lt;br /&gt;
T31..Joe.DiMaggio.............1937.......46......346....1.085.......46......167&lt;br /&gt;
T31..Barry.Bonds..............1993.......46......336....1.136.......46......123&lt;br /&gt;
T31..Lou.Gehrig................1931.......46......341....1.108.......46......184&lt;br /&gt;
T37..Hank.Aaron...............1962.......45......323....1.008.......45......128&lt;br /&gt;
T37..Willie.McCovey...........1969.......45......320....1.108.......45......126
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="62" rel="nofollow"></a>62.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;This is as best as I can do without become totally anal about it. </p>
<p>
HOMERUNS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.YEAR&#8230;&#8230;HR&#8230;&#8230;.AVG&#8230;&#8230;OPS&#8230;&#8230;HR&#8230;&#8230;.RBI<br />
1&#8230;.Barry.Bonds&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..2001&#8230;&#8230;.73&#8230;&#8230;328&#8230;.1.379&#8230;&#8230;.73&#8230;&#8230;137<br />
2&#8230;.Sammy.Sosa&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.2001&#8230;&#8230;.64&#8230;&#8230;328&#8230;.1.174&#8230;&#8230;.64&#8230;&#8230;160<br />
3&#8230;.Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1927&#8230;&#8230;.60&#8230;&#8230;356&#8230;.1.258&#8230;&#8230;.60&#8230;&#8230;164<br />
4&#8230;.Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1921&#8230;&#8230;.59&#8230;&#8230;378&#8230;.1.359&#8230;&#8230;.59&#8230;&#8230;171<br />
T5&#8230;Jimmie.Foxx&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..1932&#8230;&#8230;.58&#8230;&#8230;364&#8230;.1.218&#8230;&#8230;.58&#8230;&#8230;169<br />
T5&#8230;Hank.Greenberg&#8230;&#8230;..1938&#8230;&#8230;.58&#8230;&#8230;315&#8230;.1.122&#8230;&#8230;.58&#8230;&#8230;146<br />
7&#8230;.Luis.Gonzalez&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;2001&#8230;&#8230;.57&#8230;&#8230;325&#8230;.1.117&#8230;&#8230;.57&#8230;&#8230;142<br />
8&#8230;.Hack.Wilson&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..1930&#8230;&#8230;.56&#8230;&#8230;356&#8230;.1.177&#8230;&#8230;.56&#8230;&#8230;191<br />
T9&#8230;Mickey.Mantle&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1961&#8230;&#8230;.54&#8230;&#8230;317&#8230;.1.135&#8230;&#8230;.54&#8230;&#8230;128<br />
T9&#8230;Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1928&#8230;&#8230;.54&#8230;&#8230;323&#8230;.1.172&#8230;&#8230;.54&#8230;&#8230;142<br />
T9&#8230;Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1920&#8230;&#8230;.54&#8230;&#8230;376&#8230;.1.379&#8230;&#8230;.54&#8230;&#8230;137<br />
T12..George.Foster&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..1977&#8230;&#8230;.52&#8230;&#8230;320&#8230;.1.013&#8230;&#8230;.52&#8230;&#8230;149<br />
T12..Mickey.Mantle&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1956&#8230;&#8230;.52&#8230;&#8230;353&#8230;.1.169&#8230;&#8230;.52&#8230;&#8230;130<br />
T12..Alex.Rodriguez&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.2001&#8230;&#8230;.52&#8230;&#8230;318&#8230;.1.021&#8230;&#8230;.52&#8230;&#8230;135<br />
15&#8230;Willie.Mays&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1955&#8230;&#8230;.51&#8230;&#8230;319&#8230;.1.059&#8230;&#8230;.51&#8230;&#8230;127<br />
T16..Albert.Belle&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1995&#8230;&#8230;.50&#8230;&#8230;317&#8230;.1.091&#8230;&#8230;.50&#8230;&#8230;126<br />
T16..Sammy.Sosa&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.2000&#8230;&#8230;.50&#8230;&#8230;320&#8230;.1.040&#8230;&#8230;.50&#8230;&#8230;138<br />
T16..Jimmie.Foxx&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..1938&#8230;&#8230;.50&#8230;&#8230;349&#8230;.1.166&#8230;&#8230;.50&#8230;&#8230;175<br />
T19..Lou.Gehrig&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1936&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;354&#8230;.1.174&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;152<br />
T19..Albert.Belle&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1998&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;328&#8230;.1.055&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;152<br />
T19..Larry.Walker&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1997&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;366&#8230;.1.172&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;130<br />
T19..Ted.Kluszewski&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1954&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;326&#8230;.1.049&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;141<br />
T19..Lou.Gehrig&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1934&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;363&#8230;.1.172&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;165<br />
T19..Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1930&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;359&#8230;.1.225&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;153<br />
T19..Todd.Helton&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..2001&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;336&#8230;.1.116&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;146<br />
T19..Frank.Robinson&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1966&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;316&#8230;.1.047&#8230;&#8230;.49&#8230;&#8230;122<br />
27&#8230;Jimmie.Foxx&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..1933&#8230;&#8230;.48&#8230;&#8230;356&#8230;.1.153&#8230;&#8230;.48&#8230;&#8230;163<br />
T28..Lou.Gehrig&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1927&#8230;&#8230;.47&#8230;&#8230;373&#8230;.1.240&#8230;&#8230;.47&#8230;&#8230;175<br />
T28..Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1926&#8230;&#8230;.47&#8230;&#8230;372&#8230;.1.253&#8230;&#8230;.47&#8230;&#8230;146<br />
T28..Rafael.Palmeiro&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1999&#8230;&#8230;.47&#8230;&#8230;324&#8230;.1.050&#8230;&#8230;.47&#8230;&#8230;148<br />
T31..Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1929&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;345&#8230;.1.128&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;154<br />
T31..Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1931&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;373&#8230;.1.194&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;163<br />
T31..Babe.Ruth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1924&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;378&#8230;.1.252&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;121<br />
T31..Joe.DiMaggio&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1937&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;346&#8230;.1.085&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;167<br />
T31..Barry.Bonds&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..1993&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;336&#8230;.1.136&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;123<br />
T31..Lou.Gehrig&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.1931&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;341&#8230;.1.108&#8230;&#8230;.46&#8230;&#8230;184<br />
T37..Hank.Aaron&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;1962&#8230;&#8230;.45&#8230;&#8230;323&#8230;.1.008&#8230;&#8230;.45&#8230;&#8230;128<br />
T37..Willie.McCovey&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..1969&#8230;&#8230;.45&#8230;&#8230;320&#8230;.1.108&#8230;&#8230;.45&#8230;&#8230;126</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53150</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;61&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;61.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Nettles, yes, with 32 in 1976, not a tie. Before that it was Maris in &#039;61.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="61" rel="nofollow"></a>61.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Nettles, yes, with 32 in 1976, not a tie. Before that it was Maris in &#8217;61.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53149</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;60&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;60.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Quick, easy win. As it should have been. Nice to see that happen with Johnson on the mound.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="60" rel="nofollow"></a>60.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Quick, easy win. As it should have been. Nice to see that happen with Johnson on the mound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabernar</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53148</link>
		<dc:creator>sabernar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;59&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;59.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;Not crazy long, but the formatting won&#039;t be that great. Give me a minute to see if I can format it decently.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="59" rel="nofollow"></a>59.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Not crazy long, but the formatting won&#8217;t be that great. Give me a minute to see if I can format it decently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53147</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2005/08/26/the-royals-2/#comment-53147</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a name=&quot;58&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;58.&lt;/b&gt;&#160;&#160;(Beating a dead horse) Didn&#039;t Nettles lead the AL in HRs as a Yankee (30+ HR)? Was this also a tie?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><a name="58" rel="nofollow"></a>58.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;(Beating a dead horse) Didn&#8217;t Nettles lead the AL in HRs as a Yankee (30+ HR)? Was this also a tie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
