<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyahennystutu</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65319</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyahennystutu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65319</guid>
		<description>You guys see the Giambi rumor?  Possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys see the Giambi rumor?  Possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65318</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65318</guid>
		<description>[51] (Wondering the same thing) but at least there&#039;s cake!  ...umm, remember, I&#039;m the one who either accidentally makes sense or you get my gist after having a week to think about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[51] (Wondering the same thing) but at least there&#8217;s cake!  &#8230;umm, remember, I&#8217;m the one who either accidentally makes sense or you get my gist after having a week to think about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric B</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65317</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65317</guid>
		<description>Yes, Diane, we all read your post. May I make a suggestion? We would like to hear your thoughts on the news of the day, i.e. &quot;I am pleased w/ the CC signing&quot; or I am against  the AJ Burnett signing because...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Diane, we all read your post. May I make a suggestion? We would like to hear your thoughts on the news of the day, i.e. &#8220;I am pleased w/ the CC signing&#8221; or I am against  the AJ Burnett signing because&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65316</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65316</guid>
		<description>(wondering if anyone read my News of the Day post today)

Yeah, I know .... the fast and the furious goin&#039; on here ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(wondering if anyone read my News of the Day post today)</p>
<p>Yeah, I know &#8230;. the fast and the furious goin&#8217; on here &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL25and3</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65315</link>
		<dc:creator>JL25and3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65315</guid>
		<description>[47] Yeah, I don&#039;t get it.  What happened to the whole idea of the long-term plan, and the farm system, and all that?  

If they&#039;re talking about limited resources and cutting payroll, why are they throwing money at the organizational strength but ignoring the glaring weakness?  Burnett and/or Lowe would be good signings for one year, but for longer than that, they&#039;re a waste of resources.  And either way, Teixeira looks like a great investment for the long term.

William, I don&#039;t think the question is having a team full of 28-32 year olds, just having some players that aren&#039;t really old or in AA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[47] Yeah, I don&#8217;t get it.  What happened to the whole idea of the long-term plan, and the farm system, and all that?  </p>
<p>If they&#8217;re talking about limited resources and cutting payroll, why are they throwing money at the organizational strength but ignoring the glaring weakness?  Burnett and/or Lowe would be good signings for one year, but for longer than that, they&#8217;re a waste of resources.  And either way, Teixeira looks like a great investment for the long term.</p>
<p>William, I don&#8217;t think the question is having a team full of 28-32 year olds, just having some players that aren&#8217;t really old or in AA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65314</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65314</guid>
		<description>Maybe we can buy EVERY good pitcher in MLB? Then we can go on with a crappy offense and defense.

Frankly, I&#039;d rather watch Hughes then AJ, rather watch IPK then Lowe, and would really rather watch Tex at 1B  then Swisher.

Maybe the secret plan is to wait out Manny and then make the best offer? God... I hope not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we can buy EVERY good pitcher in MLB? Then we can go on with a crappy offense and defense.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;d rather watch Hughes then AJ, rather watch IPK then Lowe, and would really rather watch Tex at 1B  then Swisher.</p>
<p>Maybe the secret plan is to wait out Manny and then make the best offer? God&#8230; I hope not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms october</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65313</link>
		<dc:creator>ms october</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65313</guid>
		<description>mattpat needs to send drayton moore a nice holiday present.
http://tinyurl.com/6ghkjy


&quot;And with the offense only getting older and not as good but with tons of pitching waiting in the wings, doesn’t it seem far more advantageous to lock in some offensive players to longer term contracts, if you must. That is to say, they don’t have the ability to fill in for their aging offense, whereas they can fill in for their rotation.&quot;

this sums up many of the senitments her eand in a lot of cliff&#039;s recent posts quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mattpat needs to send drayton moore a nice holiday present.<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6ghkjy" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6ghkjy</a></p>
<p>&#8220;And with the offense only getting older and not as good but with tons of pitching waiting in the wings, doesn’t it seem far more advantageous to lock in some offensive players to longer term contracts, if you must. That is to say, they don’t have the ability to fill in for their aging offense, whereas they can fill in for their rotation.&#8221;</p>
<p>this sums up many of the senitments her eand in a lot of cliff&#8217;s recent posts quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65312</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65312</guid>
		<description>It would be a shame to see Tex sign with the Sox, as their offense will be in its prime for awhile as the Yanks&#039; ages. Sure, Ortiz might not be himself, but the core of that team is in its prime now or will be soon. And other than Tex, it would be a pretty CHEAP lineup, leaving them room to resign Beckett etc.

So while the Yanks would be looked into a few hefty longterm contracts, the Sox would have but one.

Now don&#039;t get me wrong, A-Rod and CC aren&#039;t likely to be huge burdens for them, despite their relative heft (so to speak). But as already discussed, signing Burnett to 5 years and perhaps even Lowe to 4 WOULD be a burden. 

And with the offense only getting older and not as good but with tons of pitching waiting in the wings, doesn&#039;t it seem far more advantageous to lock in some offensive players to longer term contracts, if you must. That is to say, they don&#039;t have the ability to fill in for their aging offense, whereas they can fill in for their rotation.

All this to say that signing Tex would be a very very very good idea, methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be a shame to see Tex sign with the Sox, as their offense will be in its prime for awhile as the Yanks&#8217; ages. Sure, Ortiz might not be himself, but the core of that team is in its prime now or will be soon. And other than Tex, it would be a pretty CHEAP lineup, leaving them room to resign Beckett etc.</p>
<p>So while the Yanks would be looked into a few hefty longterm contracts, the Sox would have but one.</p>
<p>Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, A-Rod and CC aren&#8217;t likely to be huge burdens for them, despite their relative heft (so to speak). But as already discussed, signing Burnett to 5 years and perhaps even Lowe to 4 WOULD be a burden. </p>
<p>And with the offense only getting older and not as good but with tons of pitching waiting in the wings, doesn&#8217;t it seem far more advantageous to lock in some offensive players to longer term contracts, if you must. That is to say, they don&#8217;t have the ability to fill in for their aging offense, whereas they can fill in for their rotation.</p>
<p>All this to say that signing Tex would be a very very very good idea, methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbj</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65311</link>
		<dc:creator>rbj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65311</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also, the Brewers want a second player after Cabrera. Tom Haudricourt says the Yankees tried to unload Kei Igawa on them.&quot;

Ah well, that would scotch any deal.  &quot;You want to unload A-Rod on us, and pay his salary too?  Great.  What, we have to take Igawa as well?  No thanks, keep them both.&quot;

If the deal does get squashed, let&#039;s hope it gives Melky the kick in the pants he needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also, the Brewers want a second player after Cabrera. Tom Haudricourt says the Yankees tried to unload Kei Igawa on them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah well, that would scotch any deal.  &#8220;You want to unload A-Rod on us, and pay his salary too?  Great.  What, we have to take Igawa as well?  No thanks, keep them both.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the deal does get squashed, let&#8217;s hope it gives Melky the kick in the pants he needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65310</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65310</guid>
		<description>From MLBTradeRumors:

1:01pm: Cameron&#039;s agent told Tyler Kepner nothing has been completed.  Kepner says the Brewers have actually been asking about Igawa.

11:49am: Joel Sherman talked to a top exec involved in the talks who called the chances of a deal &quot;remote.&quot; Kevin Baxter of the L.A. Times was told the deal is done, however.

11:17am: Ken Rosenthal says the potential deal hit a roadblock over the Yankees&#039; desire to have Milwaukee pick up part of the tab on Cameron.  Also, the Brewers want a second player after Cabrera.  Tom Haudricourt says the Yankees tried to unload Kei Igawa on them.

9:28am: The Cabrera for Cameron deal is close but not done, according to Joel Sherman&#039;s source.  He says the Brewers could receive a pitcher as well, with the quality depending on whether they&#039;ll assume salary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From MLBTradeRumors:</p>
<p>1:01pm: Cameron&#8217;s agent told Tyler Kepner nothing has been completed.  Kepner says the Brewers have actually been asking about Igawa.</p>
<p>11:49am: Joel Sherman talked to a top exec involved in the talks who called the chances of a deal &#8220;remote.&#8221; Kevin Baxter of the L.A. Times was told the deal is done, however.</p>
<p>11:17am: Ken Rosenthal says the potential deal hit a roadblock over the Yankees&#8217; desire to have Milwaukee pick up part of the tab on Cameron.  Also, the Brewers want a second player after Cabrera.  Tom Haudricourt says the Yankees tried to unload Kei Igawa on them.</p>
<p>9:28am: The Cabrera for Cameron deal is close but not done, according to Joel Sherman&#8217;s source.  He says the Brewers could receive a pitcher as well, with the quality depending on whether they&#8217;ll assume salary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65309</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65309</guid>
		<description>[42] Well then.  Maybe Cash is secretly reading Bill James and keeping his own counsel about fixing the offense... or so I hope.  I&#039;m of the mind that he&#039;d rather build a lasting team over time as opposed to maintaining status quo, but I have no idea what he&#039;s actually doing, and maybe I don&#039;t need to know.  Sure is frustrating though, and again begs the question: &lt;i&gt;WHY DO I CARE??&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[42] Well then.  Maybe Cash is secretly reading Bill James and keeping his own counsel about fixing the offense&#8230; or so I hope.  I&#8217;m of the mind that he&#8217;d rather build a lasting team over time as opposed to maintaining status quo, but I have no idea what he&#8217;s actually doing, and maybe I don&#8217;t need to know.  Sure is frustrating though, and again begs the question: <i>WHY DO I CARE??</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisS</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65308</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65308</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not necessarily hand-wringing.  I don&#039;t think that the Yankees will be that team chock full of youngsters and pleasant surprises (and, yes, the added potential for a losing season).  They don&#039;t approach the process that way and big chunk of the reason is that they can pay players what they have to.  The Yankees don&#039;t have the financial pressure to cut their losses and there&#039;s definitely less incentive to take risks with unproven, but talented, players (outside of pitchers it seems).  So they can hang onto players past their prime, but how many do you want to hang onto?  The Yankees threw boatloads of money at two high-end free agents in the early 90s (Bonds and Maddux), both declined to join the Yankees.  What would the late 90s teams have looked like had they those two been signed?  (No Matt Drews in &#039;93!)  Would they still have won titles?

It&#039;s a double-edged sword and I don&#039;t think I could handle being a fan of a team that is constantly in turn-over and just as a player gets good he&#039;s shown the door.  But I&#039;d like to see more of a long, pinstriped line, to steal a phrase.  Instead of looking forward to seeing which players will improve or live up to their potential, the main thing becomes whether or not Player A will produce like he has in the past or get worse and whether or not Yankees fail to win the post-season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not necessarily hand-wringing.  I don&#8217;t think that the Yankees will be that team chock full of youngsters and pleasant surprises (and, yes, the added potential for a losing season).  They don&#8217;t approach the process that way and big chunk of the reason is that they can pay players what they have to.  The Yankees don&#8217;t have the financial pressure to cut their losses and there&#8217;s definitely less incentive to take risks with unproven, but talented, players (outside of pitchers it seems).  So they can hang onto players past their prime, but how many do you want to hang onto?  The Yankees threw boatloads of money at two high-end free agents in the early 90s (Bonds and Maddux), both declined to join the Yankees.  What would the late 90s teams have looked like had they those two been signed?  (No Matt Drews in &#8217;93!)  Would they still have won titles?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a double-edged sword and I don&#8217;t think I could handle being a fan of a team that is constantly in turn-over and just as a player gets good he&#8217;s shown the door.  But I&#8217;d like to see more of a long, pinstriped line, to steal a phrase.  Instead of looking forward to seeing which players will improve or live up to their potential, the main thing becomes whether or not Player A will produce like he has in the past or get worse and whether or not Yankees fail to win the post-season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65307</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65307</guid>
		<description>[2] There are VERY few elite FAs who are worth their contract. The reality is you pay a huge premium to get these guys... take it or leave it. $100m worth of Dice-K wasn&#039;t risky? How about JD Drew? Are those 2 aren&#039;t really elite. And how about CC? Anyone think about paying him $23m/yr in 2014 and 2015?

[4] You posted 1 defensive metric. As poor as defensive stats are, how about 2 oer 3 other ones to round out the picture? Bill James Fielding Bible has him as the 6th best 1Bman from 2006-2008. Not elite, but top 20%.

Manny + Dunn might help but they are both extremely 1 dimensional players. Plus as great as Manny&#039;s bat is, for $25m/yr, the guy is too unstable.

[9] I&#039;d take Dunn as a DH, and I hear he might be a bargain. But doesn&#039;t that make Matsui superfluous?

[11] You are just wrong about Manny&#039;s D. I&#039;ve watched him for 8 years. He DOES have good hands. He catches most of what he reaches. But he gets poor jumps and can&#039;t run. He CAN come in on balls, but is terrible going into the gap. He may not be the WORST fielder, but he is in that arena. Bill James has Manny as the 2nd Worst LFer (2006-2008) and Dunn as the 3rd worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[2] There are VERY few elite FAs who are worth their contract. The reality is you pay a huge premium to get these guys&#8230; take it or leave it. $100m worth of Dice-K wasn&#8217;t risky? How about JD Drew? Are those 2 aren&#8217;t really elite. And how about CC? Anyone think about paying him $23m/yr in 2014 and 2015?</p>
<p>[4] You posted 1 defensive metric. As poor as defensive stats are, how about 2 oer 3 other ones to round out the picture? Bill James Fielding Bible has him as the 6th best 1Bman from 2006-2008. Not elite, but top 20%.</p>
<p>Manny + Dunn might help but they are both extremely 1 dimensional players. Plus as great as Manny&#8217;s bat is, for $25m/yr, the guy is too unstable.</p>
<p>[9] I&#8217;d take Dunn as a DH, and I hear he might be a bargain. But doesn&#8217;t that make Matsui superfluous?</p>
<p>[11] You are just wrong about Manny&#8217;s D. I&#8217;ve watched him for 8 years. He DOES have good hands. He catches most of what he reaches. But he gets poor jumps and can&#8217;t run. He CAN come in on balls, but is terrible going into the gap. He may not be the WORST fielder, but he is in that arena. Bill James has Manny as the 2nd Worst LFer (2006-2008) and Dunn as the 3rd worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65306</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65306</guid>
		<description>[40] Well, maybe that&#039;s the wrong approach if you believe you have to have a winning team year after year.  If you know that a player&#039;s skill is going to degrade after age 33, you should start grooming a replacement at some point.  That might seem heartless to some, but it&#039;s likely a choice between winning and maintaining friendly relations with your All-Star past.  The way I see it, the dynasties in the further-flung past for the most part still had most of their popular players come around on Old-Timers&#039; Day even when their playing days with the Yanks were stunted by non-sentimentalization.  

I dunno, things are different because the Yanks are as much a brand as they are a team (if not more so), thus they have to maintain a relationship with its glorious past at the expense of present production?  It just seems like the mixed priorities are conflicting with each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[40] Well, maybe that&#8217;s the wrong approach if you believe you have to have a winning team year after year.  If you know that a player&#8217;s skill is going to degrade after age 33, you should start grooming a replacement at some point.  That might seem heartless to some, but it&#8217;s likely a choice between winning and maintaining friendly relations with your All-Star past.  The way I see it, the dynasties in the further-flung past for the most part still had most of their popular players come around on Old-Timers&#8217; Day even when their playing days with the Yanks were stunted by non-sentimentalization.  </p>
<p>I dunno, things are different because the Yanks are as much a brand as they are a team (if not more so), thus they have to maintain a relationship with its glorious past at the expense of present production?  It just seems like the mixed priorities are conflicting with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65305</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65305</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the hand wringing about not having many position players age 28-32. Part of the reason that is he case is because the Yankees have signed long-term deals or had long relationships with  guys like Arod, Jeter and Posada. Even the likes of Matsui started with the team in that prime range. I see no reason to lament having to hold onto players past that prime range, especially if you are going to advocate an 8-10 year deal for a 28 year-old who will eventually turn 33.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the hand wringing about not having many position players age 28-32. Part of the reason that is he case is because the Yankees have signed long-term deals or had long relationships with  guys like Arod, Jeter and Posada. Even the likes of Matsui started with the team in that prime range. I see no reason to lament having to hold onto players past that prime range, especially if you are going to advocate an 8-10 year deal for a 28 year-old who will eventually turn 33.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65304</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65304</guid>
		<description>http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/rule_5.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/rule_5.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/rule_5.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65303</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65303</guid>
		<description>andres santos and jose salenes from AA team taken in minor league portion of draft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andres santos and jose salenes from AA team taken in minor league portion of draft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun P.</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65302</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65302</guid>
		<description>[34] The Twins will give Jones a look for their pen I&#039;m sure, though I don&#039;t know if he&#039;ll stay on.  The Marlins and Kroenke are another possibility.

The others (Corona and Nova) I&#039;d be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[34] The Twins will give Jones a look for their pen I&#8217;m sure, though I don&#8217;t know if he&#8217;ll stay on.  The Marlins and Kroenke are another possibility.</p>
<p>The others (Corona and Nova) I&#8217;d be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65301</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65301</guid>
		<description>Whenever I&#039;m feeling blue, I come by here and find someone fretting over how to replace Giambi and I smile and laugh and everything seems just a little sunnier ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I&#8217;m feeling blue, I come by here and find someone fretting over how to replace Giambi and I smile and laugh and everything seems just a little sunnier &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/11/what-now/#comment-65300</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=5697#comment-65300</guid>
		<description>[30] The Yanks can sign top free agents, but can&#039;t trade for young players?  I think there&#039;s too much pressure to win now as opposed to building lasting teams, especially since the team is seemingly more concerned about maintaining a billion-dollar brand.  The Yanks have indeed built themselves quite the Ivory Tower if that&#039;s the case; are they the only team in baseball that straddles both industry and sports entertainment in such mutual fashion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[30] The Yanks can sign top free agents, but can&#8217;t trade for young players?  I think there&#8217;s too much pressure to win now as opposed to building lasting teams, especially since the team is seemingly more concerned about maintaining a billion-dollar brand.  The Yanks have indeed built themselves quite the Ivory Tower if that&#8217;s the case; are they the only team in baseball that straddles both industry and sports entertainment in such mutual fashion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
