<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News of the Day &#8211; 12/17/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:08:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65692</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65692</guid>
		<description>If you are going to discard Manny for pushing the traveling secretary, you had better be prepared to disown some pretty big figures in Yankee history. Once again, the Babe himself would fail miserably under that same scrutiny.

I, for one at least, am not going to buy into the Gammons-led Red Sox party line and believe that Manny is the root of all evil. If two games and one incident erase all that he done on the field, then I think we need to reevaluate our puritanical view, or clean out the closets of the many players already in uniform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to discard Manny for pushing the traveling secretary, you had better be prepared to disown some pretty big figures in Yankee history. Once again, the Babe himself would fail miserably under that same scrutiny.</p>
<p>I, for one at least, am not going to buy into the Gammons-led Red Sox party line and believe that Manny is the root of all evil. If two games and one incident erase all that he done on the field, then I think we need to reevaluate our puritanical view, or clean out the closets of the many players already in uniform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65691</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65691</guid>
		<description>The Phils may take Lowell off the Red Sox&#039;s hands...

I must try that bacon roll.  That is awesome on so many different levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Phils may take Lowell off the Red Sox&#8217;s hands&#8230;</p>
<p>I must try that bacon roll.  That is awesome on so many different levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankee Mama</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65690</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankee Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65690</guid>
		<description>The problem with Dunn is that he&#039;s more of the same. Below par defense. I wouldn&#039;t underestimate run prevention. Plus, with Tex you get both, strong offense and stellar defense. This reminds me of the year Beltran went to the Mets. I couldn&#039;t understand what was holding the Yankees back. Seemed like a no-brainer to me. Switch hitting, young, top shelf defense.

Aaagghhhhhhh!!! As Charlie Brown would say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Dunn is that he&#8217;s more of the same. Below par defense. I wouldn&#8217;t underestimate run prevention. Plus, with Tex you get both, strong offense and stellar defense. This reminds me of the year Beltran went to the Mets. I couldn&#8217;t understand what was holding the Yankees back. Seemed like a no-brainer to me. Switch hitting, young, top shelf defense.</p>
<p>Aaagghhhhhhh!!! As Charlie Brown would say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ny2ca2dc</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65689</link>
		<dc:creator>ny2ca2dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65689</guid>
		<description>I think aside from contractual issues, the biggest benefit to Dunn, compared to both Tex and Manny, is positional flexibility.  He can play 1B and the OF corners, while Manny is a DH and Tex planted at 1B.  Obviously, Tex is a great 1B, and Dunn is a poor fielder at all his slots - but he&#039;s not Giambi/Abreu bad.  He would allow you to stick him at first and play Swisher or Damon in center (with the other one in left), or Swish in right (if Nady is traded), and when Matsui is gone Dunn could even just go to DH.  

I was all for Tex for 6 or 7 years at 20mm per, but at 9 or 10 it&#039;s time to move on.  Just because the Yanks have lately done a terrible job filling the slot doesn&#039;t mean 1B is all of a sudden a hard position to fill.  Plenty of FA 1B guys will hit the market in the next 6 years, guys like Pujols, Howard, Prince, etc.  

Besides all that though, Nady should really be on the trading block right now, I want a replacement for Tabata in the farm system!  I think a market for him would develop before the FAs settle, as he&#039;s so much cheaper.  The tier of teams who can&#039;t pay for Dunn, Tex, Manny, etc should look at Nady as a solid option.  Hell, maybe trading Nady opens up enough money to get Tex after all, which would leave Swish in RF, then go get Holliday for LF next year.  Swish&#039;s flexibility means signing Tex gives you a medium term OF asset, of which we have none if Swish is the 1B.

I guess that&#039;s all to say there is really no excuse to not add one big time hitter.  there are just so many ways to go, at plenty of price points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think aside from contractual issues, the biggest benefit to Dunn, compared to both Tex and Manny, is positional flexibility.  He can play 1B and the OF corners, while Manny is a DH and Tex planted at 1B.  Obviously, Tex is a great 1B, and Dunn is a poor fielder at all his slots &#8211; but he&#8217;s not Giambi/Abreu bad.  He would allow you to stick him at first and play Swisher or Damon in center (with the other one in left), or Swish in right (if Nady is traded), and when Matsui is gone Dunn could even just go to DH.  </p>
<p>I was all for Tex for 6 or 7 years at 20mm per, but at 9 or 10 it&#8217;s time to move on.  Just because the Yanks have lately done a terrible job filling the slot doesn&#8217;t mean 1B is all of a sudden a hard position to fill.  Plenty of FA 1B guys will hit the market in the next 6 years, guys like Pujols, Howard, Prince, etc.  </p>
<p>Besides all that though, Nady should really be on the trading block right now, I want a replacement for Tabata in the farm system!  I think a market for him would develop before the FAs settle, as he&#8217;s so much cheaper.  The tier of teams who can&#8217;t pay for Dunn, Tex, Manny, etc should look at Nady as a solid option.  Hell, maybe trading Nady opens up enough money to get Tex after all, which would leave Swish in RF, then go get Holliday for LF next year.  Swish&#8217;s flexibility means signing Tex gives you a medium term OF asset, of which we have none if Swish is the 1B.</p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s all to say there is really no excuse to not add one big time hitter.  there are just so many ways to go, at plenty of price points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65688</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65688</guid>
		<description>[19] Not to mention in regard to OPS, you&#039;re losing two guys with significant OPS factor from that lineup.  Comparing last year&#039;s OPS is a moot issue at best; we&#039;re completely ignoring what it&#039;s been replaced with so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[19] Not to mention in regard to OPS, you&#8217;re losing two guys with significant OPS factor from that lineup.  Comparing last year&#8217;s OPS is a moot issue at best; we&#8217;re completely ignoring what it&#8217;s been replaced with so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun P.</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65687</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65687</guid>
		<description>[19] The Yanks were not 3rd in OPS in MLB last year.  They were 5th in the AL, 9th in MLB if I&#039;m adding properly.

IIRC, Rob Neyer said they were 3rd in the AL in road OPS in 2008 - obviously a big difference.  Still, its possible that the Yanks offense might be OK next year without any other additions, but I&#039;m skeptical.

I think the forgotten point in all this Manny talk - and the talk about the offense in general - is the Yanks&#039; lack of depth and their over-reliance on guys who, at age 35 or older, are that much more likely to miss games due to injury.  That&#039;s even before you add Manny (going to be 37) into the equation (or Cameron - who will be 36).  Damon, Matsui, Jeter, Posada - all are likely to miss 20 games or more.  The Yanks&#039; options to cover any of those guys, even with a mere replacement-level player, are basically nil.  The reserve OFs are Shelley Duncan and whichever of Melky and Gardner isn&#039;t in CF.  Even if you consider Swisher a reserve OF, the 1B on the roster are Shelley again and Juan Miranda.  I guess Ransom could cover 1B too - but then the Yanks have no reserve 2B or SS or 3B!

Why add to that problem by signing a 37-year-old with a recent history of knee and leg issues (Manny) - or worse, trading for a 36-year-old CF?  (Though at least Gardner might be an OK cover in CF for a couple of weeks if Cameron got hurt, or in LF for Damon.)

Youth is not a panacea, but context is important here.  I&#039;d much rather the Yanks take a chance on Dunn - or somehow sign Tex - if only because either of those guys is far more likely to play 160 games next year than Manny is.

We&#039;ve already seen what happens when Posada and Matsui miss significant amounts of time.  Do we really want to see that again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[19] The Yanks were not 3rd in OPS in MLB last year.  They were 5th in the AL, 9th in MLB if I&#8217;m adding properly.</p>
<p>IIRC, Rob Neyer said they were 3rd in the AL in road OPS in 2008 &#8211; obviously a big difference.  Still, its possible that the Yanks offense might be OK next year without any other additions, but I&#8217;m skeptical.</p>
<p>I think the forgotten point in all this Manny talk &#8211; and the talk about the offense in general &#8211; is the Yanks&#8217; lack of depth and their over-reliance on guys who, at age 35 or older, are that much more likely to miss games due to injury.  That&#8217;s even before you add Manny (going to be 37) into the equation (or Cameron &#8211; who will be 36).  Damon, Matsui, Jeter, Posada &#8211; all are likely to miss 20 games or more.  The Yanks&#8217; options to cover any of those guys, even with a mere replacement-level player, are basically nil.  The reserve OFs are Shelley Duncan and whichever of Melky and Gardner isn&#8217;t in CF.  Even if you consider Swisher a reserve OF, the 1B on the roster are Shelley again and Juan Miranda.  I guess Ransom could cover 1B too &#8211; but then the Yanks have no reserve 2B or SS or 3B!</p>
<p>Why add to that problem by signing a 37-year-old with a recent history of knee and leg issues (Manny) &#8211; or worse, trading for a 36-year-old CF?  (Though at least Gardner might be an OK cover in CF for a couple of weeks if Cameron got hurt, or in LF for Damon.)</p>
<p>Youth is not a panacea, but context is important here.  I&#8217;d much rather the Yanks take a chance on Dunn &#8211; or somehow sign Tex &#8211; if only because either of those guys is far more likely to play 160 games next year than Manny is.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve already seen what happens when Posada and Matsui miss significant amounts of time.  Do we really want to see that again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65686</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65686</guid>
		<description>If they decide to go hunting for a real 1B next season, the potential 1B choices in the 2010 free agent class don&#039;t look too appealing:
http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2001/05/2010-free-agents.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they decide to go hunting for a real 1B next season, the potential 1B choices in the 2010 free agent class don&#8217;t look too appealing:<br />
<a href="http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2001/05/2010-free-agents.html" rel="nofollow">http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2001/05/2010-free-agents.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65685</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65685</guid>
		<description>The Yanks have basically had a total of THREE first baseman over the last 24 seasons:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/NYY/opening.shtml
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/vuhQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Yanks have basically had a total of THREE first baseman over the last 24 seasons:<br />
<a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/NYY/opening.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/NYY/opening.shtml</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/vuhQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/vuhQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankee Mama</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65684</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankee Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65684</guid>
		<description>I agree with Diane. I think Tex would give us a decent return on investment and would protect Alex in the line-up as well. Is Manny as scary at bat? Yes. Manny is a savant type. He has a mastery which is one in a million. Off the field, he is an eccentric, not of this universe. It&#039;s hard not to salivate on some level. The other side is that he doesn&#039;t care about what teams care about. He just wants to do what he is phenomenal at and get paid as much as possible to do it. 

Tex, on the other hand is a team guy. It has been excruciating watching the Yank&#039;s attempts to fill the hole at 1st. Mantiewicz looked great, but his bat was cold. Giambi&#039;s bat was great, but couldn&#039;t throw a ball in a straight line. I would prefer to see that addressed. Also, with Damon and Matsui, we have a log jam between LH and DH if Manny were there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Diane. I think Tex would give us a decent return on investment and would protect Alex in the line-up as well. Is Manny as scary at bat? Yes. Manny is a savant type. He has a mastery which is one in a million. Off the field, he is an eccentric, not of this universe. It&#8217;s hard not to salivate on some level. The other side is that he doesn&#8217;t care about what teams care about. He just wants to do what he is phenomenal at and get paid as much as possible to do it. </p>
<p>Tex, on the other hand is a team guy. It has been excruciating watching the Yank&#8217;s attempts to fill the hole at 1st. Mantiewicz looked great, but his bat was cold. Giambi&#8217;s bat was great, but couldn&#8217;t throw a ball in a straight line. I would prefer to see that addressed. Also, with Damon and Matsui, we have a log jam between LH and DH if Manny were there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65683</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65683</guid>
		<description>[22] On the other hand, part of what Cashman&#039;s stated (at least) plan is to have internal options available to replace those aging stars. Part of the benefit of singing Manny to 2-3 years instead of Tex to 9 is that ideally in 2-3 years you have a replacement. Of course, that might not happen, but then its the Yankees own damn fault. That would allow for the win now and win in the future as well approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[22] On the other hand, part of what Cashman&#8217;s stated (at least) plan is to have internal options available to replace those aging stars. Part of the benefit of singing Manny to 2-3 years instead of Tex to 9 is that ideally in 2-3 years you have a replacement. Of course, that might not happen, but then its the Yankees own damn fault. That would allow for the win now and win in the future as well approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65682</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65682</guid>
		<description>[19]
The &quot;window of opportunity&quot; *is* important to the current Yankees, simply because you don&#039;t want to have to scramble three years from now to replace a catcher AND a shortstop and perhaps your stopgap first baseman and your aging outfielders all in one off-season.  I mean, look at what they&#039;re going through now because they kept signing past-prime or suspect pitching talent.  You have the opportunity to sign the best 1B to hit the market in the last few years, and also benefit at the same time by not having to worry about the position for some time.

If they sign Manny, its yet another position they have to fill in three years.

Giambi&#039;s offensive numbers were indeed better than Tex when he first signed (especially having played in that Oakland park with all the foul territory).  However, Giambi was always a wreck defensively, and his skill set (and use of PEDs) led to a rapid decline, which many of us could have (did?) foreseen  at the signing of that 7-year deal.

As for the OPS last year ... Giambi and Abreu were 2nd and 3rd on the team in OPS+ .... why not slot Tex into one of those holes?

(Kim Ng ... watch out) :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[19]<br />
The &#8220;window of opportunity&#8221; *is* important to the current Yankees, simply because you don&#8217;t want to have to scramble three years from now to replace a catcher AND a shortstop and perhaps your stopgap first baseman and your aging outfielders all in one off-season.  I mean, look at what they&#8217;re going through now because they kept signing past-prime or suspect pitching talent.  You have the opportunity to sign the best 1B to hit the market in the last few years, and also benefit at the same time by not having to worry about the position for some time.</p>
<p>If they sign Manny, its yet another position they have to fill in three years.</p>
<p>Giambi&#8217;s offensive numbers were indeed better than Tex when he first signed (especially having played in that Oakland park with all the foul territory).  However, Giambi was always a wreck defensively, and his skill set (and use of PEDs) led to a rapid decline, which many of us could have (did?) foreseen  at the signing of that 7-year deal.</p>
<p>As for the OPS last year &#8230; Giambi and Abreu were 2nd and 3rd on the team in OPS+ &#8230;. why not slot Tex into one of those holes?</p>
<p>(Kim Ng &#8230; watch out) <img src='http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65681</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65681</guid>
		<description>[19] And they are now talking about 9 years needing to get it done for Tex.

I really really wanted the Yanks to sign Tex, but I think 9 years and 200M for a 1B is pretty much a bad idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[19] And they are now talking about 9 years needing to get it done for Tex.</p>
<p>I really really wanted the Yanks to sign Tex, but I think 9 years and 200M for a 1B is pretty much a bad idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65680</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65680</guid>
		<description>[14] While I stand by my comment, I don&#039;t want to stir up controversy. It just bothers me to no end to hear the &quot;Manny disrespects the game because he wears baggy pants and has dreads etc&quot; lines over and over again. But, so be it.

[14][15] I did forget the traveling secretary incident, but Manny also apologized, and perhaps worse, was allowed to get away with such behavior by the Sox org. 

But as for &quot;And the fact that it came in the midst of an obvious series of “dogging it” episodes (e.g. leaving his bat on his shoulder for 3 straight down the middle pitches, forgetting which knee was “hurt”, etc.)&quot;
I&#039;m sorry, but there is no way to prove that Manny purposefully struck out. In fact, if anything, Manny has proved quite the opposite, that despite whatever else might be going on, when he is in the batters box, he is there to do one thing, hit. If Manny was &quot;dogging it&quot; last season, he did so to a tune that outhit everyone but ARod on the Yanks.

And I still stand by my original statement: The notion that Manny is somehow of lesser character than everyone else is a convenient excuse. Should his &quot;dogging it&quot; rumors and his incident with the traveling secretary be considered worse than driving drunk? Or punching a wall? Or throwing at someones head on purpose? Or taking roids? Or beating your spouse? Or getting in bar fights?

Because all of those things have happened in the last year, and are just as &quot;dangerous&quot; or worse, yet the focus is on Manny&#039;s &quot;bad character.&quot;

The Yanks have had plenty of bad apples on their team. They&#039;ve won with them and lost with them. 

I&#039;m sorry, if you were okay having Gary freaking Sheffield on your team, than Manny HAS to be ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[14] While I stand by my comment, I don&#8217;t want to stir up controversy. It just bothers me to no end to hear the &#8220;Manny disrespects the game because he wears baggy pants and has dreads etc&#8221; lines over and over again. But, so be it.</p>
<p>[14][15] I did forget the traveling secretary incident, but Manny also apologized, and perhaps worse, was allowed to get away with such behavior by the Sox org. </p>
<p>But as for &#8220;And the fact that it came in the midst of an obvious series of “dogging it” episodes (e.g. leaving his bat on his shoulder for 3 straight down the middle pitches, forgetting which knee was “hurt”, etc.)&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m sorry, but there is no way to prove that Manny purposefully struck out. In fact, if anything, Manny has proved quite the opposite, that despite whatever else might be going on, when he is in the batters box, he is there to do one thing, hit. If Manny was &#8220;dogging it&#8221; last season, he did so to a tune that outhit everyone but ARod on the Yanks.</p>
<p>And I still stand by my original statement: The notion that Manny is somehow of lesser character than everyone else is a convenient excuse. Should his &#8220;dogging it&#8221; rumors and his incident with the traveling secretary be considered worse than driving drunk? Or punching a wall? Or throwing at someones head on purpose? Or taking roids? Or beating your spouse? Or getting in bar fights?</p>
<p>Because all of those things have happened in the last year, and are just as &#8220;dangerous&#8221; or worse, yet the focus is on Manny&#8217;s &#8220;bad character.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Yanks have had plenty of bad apples on their team. They&#8217;ve won with them and lost with them. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, if you were okay having Gary freaking Sheffield on your team, than Manny HAS to be ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankster</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65679</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65679</guid>
		<description>Two things:
1) &quot;Window of Opportunity&quot; describes a situation where you have a bunch of players under control at low salaries at which their ability cannot readily be replaced. The Yankees, who pay aging stars more than anyone else, NEVER have &quot;windows of opportunity.&quot; -  Win now! before we replace Posada with the best free agent catcher in baseball (whoever that turns out to be). Win now before we replace Jeter with the best free agent SS? Ridiculous - it&#039;s a window of nostalgic opportunity - &quot;will the old squad win again?&quot;

2) There are no good 8 year contracts. Giambi was much better (may still be better) than Teixera when he was first signed - who wants that to have lasted 8 years? Let&#039;s go with Swisher for a bit and see where it gets us. Yanks were third in baseball in OPS last year - what&#039;s all the kvetching about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:<br />
1) &#8220;Window of Opportunity&#8221; describes a situation where you have a bunch of players under control at low salaries at which their ability cannot readily be replaced. The Yankees, who pay aging stars more than anyone else, NEVER have &#8220;windows of opportunity.&#8221; &#8211;  Win now! before we replace Posada with the best free agent catcher in baseball (whoever that turns out to be). Win now before we replace Jeter with the best free agent SS? Ridiculous &#8211; it&#8217;s a window of nostalgic opportunity &#8211; &#8220;will the old squad win again?&#8221;</p>
<p>2) There are no good 8 year contracts. Giambi was much better (may still be better) than Teixera when he was first signed &#8211; who wants that to have lasted 8 years? Let&#8217;s go with Swisher for a bit and see where it gets us. Yanks were third in baseball in OPS last year &#8211; what&#8217;s all the kvetching about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65678</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65678</guid>
		<description>The funny thing is, I LOVE Manny. When I saw the Sox at the stadium last summer I watched him almost exclusively the whole time and it was HILARIOUS. The guy is absolutely a space cadet. It would be a mistake to get into the definition of the word &quot;thuggish&quot;, but  I don&#039;t think Manny is that. I don&#039;t think he&#039;s really a bad guy, just a real weirdo. Yeah he pushed that old guy over, but I&#039;ll give him the benefit of the doubt that it was an accident since he went his entire career with assaulting the elderly prior to that.

All that being said, I just don&#039;t know how well he&#039;ll fit in on the Yankees. I think all their concerns they had when he was last available still stand ... Maybe though, his weirdness and A-Rod&#039;s will somehow cancel each other out. Or maybe they will spur each other on to even greater heights of weirdness ... A-Rod marries Dolly Parton? Manny falls asleep at home plate after hitting a home run? These things and more may come true; also they might have 500 RBI between them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is, I LOVE Manny. When I saw the Sox at the stadium last summer I watched him almost exclusively the whole time and it was HILARIOUS. The guy is absolutely a space cadet. It would be a mistake to get into the definition of the word &#8220;thuggish&#8221;, but  I don&#8217;t think Manny is that. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s really a bad guy, just a real weirdo. Yeah he pushed that old guy over, but I&#8217;ll give him the benefit of the doubt that it was an accident since he went his entire career with assaulting the elderly prior to that.</p>
<p>All that being said, I just don&#8217;t know how well he&#8217;ll fit in on the Yankees. I think all their concerns they had when he was last available still stand &#8230; Maybe though, his weirdness and A-Rod&#8217;s will somehow cancel each other out. Or maybe they will spur each other on to even greater heights of weirdness &#8230; A-Rod marries Dolly Parton? Manny falls asleep at home plate after hitting a home run? These things and more may come true; also they might have 500 RBI between them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyahennystutu</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65677</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyahennystutu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65677</guid>
		<description>Also, let&#039;s not forget the place of character in todays instantaneous 24/7 news-info world vs. its place in the 30s - 80s.  The reality is that today we know more about every word and deed  of every celebrity and athlete on earth.  And we know it pretty much instantly.  

20 - 100 years ago, the news cycle consisted of 1-2 editions of a daily paper and the evening news.  The press corps was way smaller.  And on and on.  

We had plenty of alcoholics, abusers (physical and substance), cheaters, louts, etc. on the team over the years - including some legends with retired numbers!

I&#039;m sort of playing devil&#039;s advocate b/c I&#039;m of two minds on Manny.  But ignore the past at your own peril...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, let&#8217;s not forget the place of character in todays instantaneous 24/7 news-info world vs. its place in the 30s &#8211; 80s.  The reality is that today we know more about every word and deed  of every celebrity and athlete on earth.  And we know it pretty much instantly.  </p>
<p>20 &#8211; 100 years ago, the news cycle consisted of 1-2 editions of a daily paper and the evening news.  The press corps was way smaller.  And on and on.  </p>
<p>We had plenty of alcoholics, abusers (physical and substance), cheaters, louts, etc. on the team over the years &#8211; including some legends with retired numbers!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sort of playing devil&#8217;s advocate b/c I&#8217;m of two minds on Manny.  But ignore the past at your own peril&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyahennystutu</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65676</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyahennystutu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65676</guid>
		<description>should append sentence in 2nd paragraph with:

...combines to make things worse in terms of his character.  He was clearly - literally and figuratively - shoving his way out of town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should append sentence in 2nd paragraph with:</p>
<p>&#8230;combines to make things worse in terms of his character.  He was clearly &#8211; literally and figuratively &#8211; shoving his way out of town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyahennystutu</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65675</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyahennystutu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65675</guid>
		<description>Uhhh Zack [13] you&#039;re conveniently forgetting his assault of a 64 year old man last year over the mortal slight that *Manhy didn&#039;t get enough tickets to a game*.  That makes him a low life and a thug.  Full stop.

And the fact that it came in the midst of an obvious series of &quot;dogging it&quot; episodes (e.g. leaving his bat on his shoulder for 3 straight down the middle pitches, forgetting which knee was &quot;hurt&quot;, etc.)

And you&#039;re also forgetting the fact that it was Papi protecting Manny in the clubhouse and from the press.

All this said, let&#039;s not assume the Yanks have given up the character driven approach just yet.  After all, all we know is what we read in the papers.  Has Hank been quoted about loving Manny?  Sure.  But he&#039;s always good for a quote.  About anyone or anything.  Until there&#039;s a confirmed offer, all this taking offense to the notion of Manny on the Yanks b/c he doesn&#039;t fit the brand/character mold is just speculative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhh Zack [13] you&#8217;re conveniently forgetting his assault of a 64 year old man last year over the mortal slight that *Manhy didn&#8217;t get enough tickets to a game*.  That makes him a low life and a thug.  Full stop.</p>
<p>And the fact that it came in the midst of an obvious series of &#8220;dogging it&#8221; episodes (e.g. leaving his bat on his shoulder for 3 straight down the middle pitches, forgetting which knee was &#8220;hurt&#8221;, etc.)</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re also forgetting the fact that it was Papi protecting Manny in the clubhouse and from the press.</p>
<p>All this said, let&#8217;s not assume the Yanks have given up the character driven approach just yet.  After all, all we know is what we read in the papers.  Has Hank been quoted about loving Manny?  Sure.  But he&#8217;s always good for a quote.  About anyone or anything.  Until there&#8217;s a confirmed offer, all this taking offense to the notion of Manny on the Yanks b/c he doesn&#8217;t fit the brand/character mold is just speculative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Belth</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65674</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Belth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65674</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a dangerous game suggesting any underlying racism in Mick&#039;s comments, though I understand what you are getting at.  Further, Manny has displayed some thuggish behavior as in when he shoved a 60+year old traveling secretary to the ground last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a dangerous game suggesting any underlying racism in Mick&#8217;s comments, though I understand what you are getting at.  Further, Manny has displayed some thuggish behavior as in when he shoved a 60+year old traveling secretary to the ground last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/17/news-of-the-day-121708/#comment-65673</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6046#comment-65673</guid>
		<description>[12] There does seem to be an underlying bit of racism to your post, but leaving that aside, the notion that Manny is a &#039;low life&#039; is absurd. 

What, he watches his home runs, does some goofy things, is a mental case and can be counted on for 15 or so &quot;mental off days a season,&quot; and supposedly &quot;tanked&quot; the first half of last year despite hitting to an ops+ of 130, better than anyone save Arod on the Yanks?

First, the Yanks have had plenty of guys who watch their home runs, do goofy things, and take mental days. El Duque almost always hit the dl with some injury or another that nobody could figure out. The line between Damon and Manny isn&#039;t so far apart.

But even ignoring all that, Manny has never, say, been caught drunk driving like a certain fan favorite kid. He&#039;s never been caught with a gun, never cursed anyone out, or anything remotely &quot;thugish.&quot; Hes a putz, but he isn&#039;t dangerous, and if he is such a &quot;cancer,&quot; it sure didn&#039;t hurt the Sox. Remember that 2004 team that had such great &quot;chemistry&quot; and that helped them win? wasn&#039;t Manny on that team?

There is simply no better bat out there than Manny&#039;s. Not Dunn. Not Tex. If the Yankees can get Manny for two years, then they should. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[12] There does seem to be an underlying bit of racism to your post, but leaving that aside, the notion that Manny is a &#8216;low life&#8217; is absurd. </p>
<p>What, he watches his home runs, does some goofy things, is a mental case and can be counted on for 15 or so &#8220;mental off days a season,&#8221; and supposedly &#8220;tanked&#8221; the first half of last year despite hitting to an ops+ of 130, better than anyone save Arod on the Yanks?</p>
<p>First, the Yanks have had plenty of guys who watch their home runs, do goofy things, and take mental days. El Duque almost always hit the dl with some injury or another that nobody could figure out. The line between Damon and Manny isn&#8217;t so far apart.</p>
<p>But even ignoring all that, Manny has never, say, been caught drunk driving like a certain fan favorite kid. He&#8217;s never been caught with a gun, never cursed anyone out, or anything remotely &#8220;thugish.&#8221; Hes a putz, but he isn&#8217;t dangerous, and if he is such a &#8220;cancer,&#8221; it sure didn&#8217;t hurt the Sox. Remember that 2004 team that had such great &#8220;chemistry&#8221; and that helped them win? wasn&#8217;t Manny on that team?</p>
<p>There is simply no better bat out there than Manny&#8217;s. Not Dunn. Not Tex. If the Yankees can get Manny for two years, then they should. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
