<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News of the Day &#8211; 12/18/08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horace Clarke Era</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65757</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Clarke Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65757</guid>
		<description>Cliff I&#039;m with Diane, obviously. See little downside to Baldelli in a contract built around plate appearances and incentives. Beats 10 million for Cameron, for me. Plate discipline? Agreed, he&#039;s, he&#039;s ... a regular Robbie Cano!

Zack, the snag with your reasoning is that there is too little VALUE to those pitchers right now. No idea what kind of &#039;quality bat&#039; you think could be obtained for pitchers at their lowest valuation ever, or others who have not yet shown anything. You want, maybe, Matt Holliday? Ian Kennedy comin atcha! Deal?

13th, I actually think there are a lot of ManFans here, from what I&#039;m reading. Not sure how many would go with you as far as &#039;endearing&#039; though. I used to think of him as just quirky, eccentric, unique ... a kind of Mickey Rivers &#039;on his own planet&#039; guy. But last two-three years, the which-knee-is-hurt stuff OYF mentioned ... nope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff I&#8217;m with Diane, obviously. See little downside to Baldelli in a contract built around plate appearances and incentives. Beats 10 million for Cameron, for me. Plate discipline? Agreed, he&#8217;s, he&#8217;s &#8230; a regular Robbie Cano!</p>
<p>Zack, the snag with your reasoning is that there is too little VALUE to those pitchers right now. No idea what kind of &#8216;quality bat&#8217; you think could be obtained for pitchers at their lowest valuation ever, or others who have not yet shown anything. You want, maybe, Matt Holliday? Ian Kennedy comin atcha! Deal?</p>
<p>13th, I actually think there are a lot of ManFans here, from what I&#8217;m reading. Not sure how many would go with you as far as &#8216;endearing&#8217; though. I used to think of him as just quirky, eccentric, unique &#8230; a kind of Mickey Rivers &#8216;on his own planet&#8217; guy. But last two-three years, the which-knee-is-hurt stuff OYF mentioned &#8230; nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 13th</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65756</link>
		<dc:creator>The 13th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65756</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m in the minority here, but I like Manny. I fear him as an opponent and I find his persona endearing. He&#039;s certainly one of the most entertaining players around today. 

I think if he comes to the Yankees, they won&#039;t let him get away with what Boston allowed. As for the motivation allegations, he may not play for another big contract again but he&#039;ll certainly have the motivation to stick it to a certain team I&#039;m sure he resents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m in the minority here, but I like Manny. I fear him as an opponent and I find his persona endearing. He&#8217;s certainly one of the most entertaining players around today. </p>
<p>I think if he comes to the Yankees, they won&#8217;t let him get away with what Boston allowed. As for the motivation allegations, he may not play for another big contract again but he&#8217;ll certainly have the motivation to stick it to a certain team I&#8217;m sure he resents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65755</link>
		<dc:creator>zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65755</guid>
		<description>William, I am totally with you on all your points, so i won&#039;t bother restating them. We seem to be waving the flag together, alone, but so be it. I guess 2009 will be a year of agreements between us instead of arguments. Who knows!

In any case, if the Yankees DON&#039;T sign a FA bat, I think they should make the Cameron trade. Hoping that Melky will somehow turn it around in the winter league strikes me as very very foolish. Sure, he might. But its a lot more likely that he won&#039;t, and as soon as the season starts he&#039;ll revert to form. After all, its not like hes facing the cream of the crop down there.

I would really like to see the Yanks sign Manny, and then turn Nady and some of the ml pitching (and even Melky if anyone wants him) into a young impact bat or two. As mentioned in the last thread, the Rangers did that with Hamilton. With the rotation as it is, they can certainly afford to trade some of that depth.

I know, I know, the Yankees simply can&#039;t trade young pitching because it wins championships and you need equal value blah blah blah. Suggesting trading prospects has become such sacrilege these days. But honestly, for the umpteenth time, the Yankees have more RH pitching than they can possibly deal with. Fine, you don&#039;t want to trade Hughes, trade McAllister and Betencis, or Brackman. Or Bliech. Or Garcia. Or whomever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, I am totally with you on all your points, so i won&#8217;t bother restating them. We seem to be waving the flag together, alone, but so be it. I guess 2009 will be a year of agreements between us instead of arguments. Who knows!</p>
<p>In any case, if the Yankees DON&#8217;T sign a FA bat, I think they should make the Cameron trade. Hoping that Melky will somehow turn it around in the winter league strikes me as very very foolish. Sure, he might. But its a lot more likely that he won&#8217;t, and as soon as the season starts he&#8217;ll revert to form. After all, its not like hes facing the cream of the crop down there.</p>
<p>I would really like to see the Yanks sign Manny, and then turn Nady and some of the ml pitching (and even Melky if anyone wants him) into a young impact bat or two. As mentioned in the last thread, the Rangers did that with Hamilton. With the rotation as it is, they can certainly afford to trade some of that depth.</p>
<p>I know, I know, the Yankees simply can&#8217;t trade young pitching because it wins championships and you need equal value blah blah blah. Suggesting trading prospects has become such sacrilege these days. But honestly, for the umpteenth time, the Yankees have more RH pitching than they can possibly deal with. Fine, you don&#8217;t want to trade Hughes, trade McAllister and Betencis, or Brackman. Or Bliech. Or Garcia. Or whomever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65754</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65754</guid>
		<description>[13]

I hear ya&#039; .... totally.  I was thinking of him as a &quot;low-risk&quot;/&quot;high-reward&quot; potential pickup.

There are few suitable answers for CF out there right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[13]</p>
<p>I hear ya&#8217; &#8230;. totally.  I was thinking of him as a &#8220;low-risk&#8221;/&#8221;high-reward&#8221; potential pickup.</p>
<p>There are few suitable answers for CF out there right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65753</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65753</guid>
		<description>Diane, just because Baldelli&#039;s condition turns out to be more treatable doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s going to leap back to full health. He still has a cellular disorder, and he still didn&#039;t play a single game in center field last year in the majors or minors (also, as an indication of his mobility, he didn&#039;t steal a single base after returning to majors). He&#039;s still young enough and could be a solid right-handed bench bat right now, but his days as a center fielder may very well be over, even if he responds well to treatment. Oh, and his plate discipline is still terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane, just because Baldelli&#8217;s condition turns out to be more treatable doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s going to leap back to full health. He still has a cellular disorder, and he still didn&#8217;t play a single game in center field last year in the majors or minors (also, as an indication of his mobility, he didn&#8217;t steal a single base after returning to majors). He&#8217;s still young enough and could be a solid right-handed bench bat right now, but his days as a center fielder may very well be over, even if he responds well to treatment. Oh, and his plate discipline is still terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 51cq24</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65752</link>
		<dc:creator>51cq24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65752</guid>
		<description>manny is the best hitter i&#039;ve ever seen.  i don&#039;t love him, especially since he supposedly threw boston&#039;s costanza to the ground (and while i believe it probably happened, i haven&#039;t seen any evidence, and clearly boston was looking for an excuse to get rid of him), but i&#039;ve always liked that he seems to enjoy himself.  furthermore, it&#039;s always seemed to me that he wanted more than anything to play for the yankees.  it was a mistake not to sign him in 2000.  while i&#039;m usually against signing an older player, manny has shown no signs of decline and is only 36.  as william points out, even when he had supposedly quit playing for boston last year, he put up a 136 ops+.  then a 219 ops+ in la.  i understand the resentment towards a player who doesn&#039;t seem to always try his hardest, but if he can do .299/.398/.529 at his worst, what is the big deal?  would you rather have a shitty player who always tries hard?  
manny is better than teixeira.  he isn&#039;t a good fielder, but would that really make a big difference?  hopefully he&#039;d split time between rf and (mostly) dh, and we can trade damon for a minor leaguer or something.
and how can you not like a player who tried to get away with putting a water bottle in his back pocket?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>manny is the best hitter i&#8217;ve ever seen.  i don&#8217;t love him, especially since he supposedly threw boston&#8217;s costanza to the ground (and while i believe it probably happened, i haven&#8217;t seen any evidence, and clearly boston was looking for an excuse to get rid of him), but i&#8217;ve always liked that he seems to enjoy himself.  furthermore, it&#8217;s always seemed to me that he wanted more than anything to play for the yankees.  it was a mistake not to sign him in 2000.  while i&#8217;m usually against signing an older player, manny has shown no signs of decline and is only 36.  as william points out, even when he had supposedly quit playing for boston last year, he put up a 136 ops+.  then a 219 ops+ in la.  i understand the resentment towards a player who doesn&#8217;t seem to always try his hardest, but if he can do .299/.398/.529 at his worst, what is the big deal?  would you rather have a shitty player who always tries hard?<br />
manny is better than teixeira.  he isn&#8217;t a good fielder, but would that really make a big difference?  hopefully he&#8217;d split time between rf and (mostly) dh, and we can trade damon for a minor leaguer or something.<br />
and how can you not like a player who tried to get away with putting a water bottle in his back pocket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattpat11</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65751</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattpat11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65751</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092&amp;cp=1#comment-83548&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rbj&lt;/a&gt;

I gave up on believing anything The Times had to say when the simply made shit up about a major Presidential candidate during the Presidential primary campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092&amp;cp=1#comment-83548" rel="nofollow">rbj</a></p>
<p>I gave up on believing anything The Times had to say when the simply made shit up about a major Presidential candidate during the Presidential primary campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horace Clarke Era</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65750</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Clarke Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65750</guid>
		<description>Newsday has two reporters essentially saying &#039;next to no chance&#039; for Yankees-ManRam. He doesn&#039;t &#039;fit&#039; Cashman&#039;s style, and the YoungenSteins are allegedly less likely to push him now than they did with A Rod. (A Rod happened during the Torre fallout.) 

If so, we&#039;re best off with Teixeira to Anaheim for his 200 million, and then Manny stays in L.A. with Torre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newsday has two reporters essentially saying &#8216;next to no chance&#8217; for Yankees-ManRam. He doesn&#8217;t &#8216;fit&#8217; Cashman&#8217;s style, and the YoungenSteins are allegedly less likely to push him now than they did with A Rod. (A Rod happened during the Torre fallout.) </p>
<p>If so, we&#8217;re best off with Teixeira to Anaheim for his 200 million, and then Manny stays in L.A. with Torre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimelo</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65749</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65749</guid>
		<description>I find Rhoden to be sloppy with his writing there, and to cite that comment about Sabathia as that being so profound is just silly.  I also hate it that people like to blame the establishment as why African American kids aren&#039;t into baseball.  

The little league games in Inwood and other areas I&#039;ve seen, have a ton of Spanish kids there, and they are suffering through the same socio-economic condition as Black kids.  I guess it&#039;s more convenient to blame someone than to say, Black kids aren&#039;t interested in baseball because the athletes most of them look up to play different sports - i.e basketball and football.  

Not saying I don&#039;t see African American kids in these little league games because I do, but the bottom line is that a lot of them end up enjoying more the other sports they play. 

One thing though, having someone like Sabathia and players like Jimmy Rollins play for well known urban teams like Philadelphia and New York will help with the exposure.  But I don&#039;t think it is MLB&#039;s fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Rhoden to be sloppy with his writing there, and to cite that comment about Sabathia as that being so profound is just silly.  I also hate it that people like to blame the establishment as why African American kids aren&#8217;t into baseball.  </p>
<p>The little league games in Inwood and other areas I&#8217;ve seen, have a ton of Spanish kids there, and they are suffering through the same socio-economic condition as Black kids.  I guess it&#8217;s more convenient to blame someone than to say, Black kids aren&#8217;t interested in baseball because the athletes most of them look up to play different sports &#8211; i.e basketball and football.  </p>
<p>Not saying I don&#8217;t see African American kids in these little league games because I do, but the bottom line is that a lot of them end up enjoying more the other sports they play. </p>
<p>One thing though, having someone like Sabathia and players like Jimmy Rollins play for well known urban teams like Philadelphia and New York will help with the exposure.  But I don&#8217;t think it is MLB&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horace Clarke Era</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65748</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Clarke Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65748</guid>
		<description>I think Manny plays out, as many other dudes will, only after Teixeira&#039;s done. Anaheim will very possibly chase him for 3 years if Boston lands Tex. Though it will be amusing to watch a hardcase like Scioscia have to deal with ManRam. If Anaheim signs Tex, Boston&#039;s in a trickier spot (Dunn? Bradley?) as someone here pointed out (was it OYF? William?) since they can&#039;t and won&#039;t touch Manny.

My bet is that if Boston DOES land Teixeira, though, we&#039;ll battle Anaheim for Ramirez ... the old AL East arms race. Alas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Manny plays out, as many other dudes will, only after Teixeira&#8217;s done. Anaheim will very possibly chase him for 3 years if Boston lands Tex. Though it will be amusing to watch a hardcase like Scioscia have to deal with ManRam. If Anaheim signs Tex, Boston&#8217;s in a trickier spot (Dunn? Bradley?) as someone here pointed out (was it OYF? William?) since they can&#8217;t and won&#8217;t touch Manny.</p>
<p>My bet is that if Boston DOES land Teixeira, though, we&#8217;ll battle Anaheim for Ramirez &#8230; the old AL East arms race. Alas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun P.</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65747</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65747</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reminder about Brien Taylor, Diane.  I think you&#039;re right about the &quot;what if&quot; aspect; he has such talent.  My favorite &quot;what if&quot; scenario always involved Kenny Rogers.  &quot;What if&quot; Taylor never got hurt, progressed enough that he made the same big-league cameo as Jeter did in &#039;95, and was ready for the bigs in &#039;96?  Would the Yanks have signed Rogers?  Would they have made the Brosius deal?  Would they have ever dealt Lowell?  And so on.

OK, no Cameron = get another (non-Manny) bat, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder about Brien Taylor, Diane.  I think you&#8217;re right about the &#8220;what if&#8221; aspect; he has such talent.  My favorite &#8220;what if&#8221; scenario always involved Kenny Rogers.  &#8220;What if&#8221; Taylor never got hurt, progressed enough that he made the same big-league cameo as Jeter did in &#8217;95, and was ready for the bigs in &#8217;96?  Would the Yanks have signed Rogers?  Would they have made the Brosius deal?  Would they have ever dealt Lowell?  And so on.</p>
<p>OK, no Cameron = get another (non-Manny) bat, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbj</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65746</link>
		<dc:creator>rbj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65746</guid>
		<description>Given that the Times spiked a couple of sports columns because they didn&#039;t fit Howell Raines&#039; viewpoint on opening Augusta to women, I cannot trust anything in that paper anymore.

I hope that just the rumor of a deal is enough of a kick in the pants to Melky.  Dude, you&#039;re playing where Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantle, and Bernie Williams played.

Just say no to Manny.  Yankees need to get younger, not bring in yet another older star whom they&#039;ll wind up giving a bit too much money and a year or two too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that the Times spiked a couple of sports columns because they didn&#8217;t fit Howell Raines&#8217; viewpoint on opening Augusta to women, I cannot trust anything in that paper anymore.</p>
<p>I hope that just the rumor of a deal is enough of a kick in the pants to Melky.  Dude, you&#8217;re playing where Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantle, and Bernie Williams played.</p>
<p>Just say no to Manny.  Yankees need to get younger, not bring in yet another older star whom they&#8217;ll wind up giving a bit too much money and a year or two too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65745</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65745</guid>
		<description>[4] I think Rhoden&#039;s right. Yeah they got credit back then for being &quot;professional&quot;, but that was also in part in contrast to the most recent championships at that time, the late 70s. Maybe moreso, it was the lack of superstars on those 90s teams ... The tags of &quot;professional&quot; and &quot;workmanlike&quot; were compliments, not just because they were winning (which is a fair measuring rod as to whether those attributes are a boon or not, methinks) but because they were doing it in humble fashion, with relatively humble talent.  

I  recently read an archived article on SI.com that tangentially touched on this, where Verducci is saying after the Clemens signing, it&#039;s okay to hate the Yankees again ... He references them as a &quot;lunchpail&quot; team ... It&#039;s hard to imagine now but there was an actual phenomenon where the personality of those teams temporarily mitigated some built-in, universal hatred of the Yankees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[4] I think Rhoden&#8217;s right. Yeah they got credit back then for being &#8220;professional&#8221;, but that was also in part in contrast to the most recent championships at that time, the late 70s. Maybe moreso, it was the lack of superstars on those 90s teams &#8230; The tags of &#8220;professional&#8221; and &#8220;workmanlike&#8221; were compliments, not just because they were winning (which is a fair measuring rod as to whether those attributes are a boon or not, methinks) but because they were doing it in humble fashion, with relatively humble talent.  </p>
<p>I  recently read an archived article on SI.com that tangentially touched on this, where Verducci is saying after the Clemens signing, it&#8217;s okay to hate the Yankees again &#8230; He references them as a &#8220;lunchpail&#8221; team &#8230; It&#8217;s hard to imagine now but there was an actual phenomenon where the personality of those teams temporarily mitigated some built-in, universal hatred of the Yankees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knuckles</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65744</link>
		<dc:creator>knuckles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65744</guid>
		<description>I’m glad the deal is dead, mainly because I don’t have a lot of faith in Cameron to be all that productive over the next couple years.  I do like Melky and enjoy watching him, but he still has got to show some kind of turnaround, and soon.

Re: Rhoden…funny how when the Yanks were winning all those World Series, the clubhouse atmosphere was “professional”, “workmanlike”, etc.  And now that they’re in the 8th year of a championship drought (and the Times is linked closely to the Sox), the Yanks suddenly have a “stale, cliché-ridden” clubhouse, known for being “antiseptic”?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m glad the deal is dead, mainly because I don’t have a lot of faith in Cameron to be all that productive over the next couple years.  I do like Melky and enjoy watching him, but he still has got to show some kind of turnaround, and soon.</p>
<p>Re: Rhoden…funny how when the Yanks were winning all those World Series, the clubhouse atmosphere was “professional”, “workmanlike”, etc.  And now that they’re in the 8th year of a championship drought (and the Times is linked closely to the Sox), the Yanks suddenly have a “stale, cliché-ridden” clubhouse, known for being “antiseptic”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65743</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65743</guid>
		<description>One more thing...it seemed like odd timing to have John Henry, whose hedge funds have taken a beating in the current climate, talk about how the Red Sox and all of baseball would be negatively impacted by the economy. That doesn&#039;t seem like a statement you make before signing an 8-yr/$180mn deal, which leads me to believe maybe the Red Sox are backing away from Tex. Perhaps, Henry&#039;s comments are laying the way for a hasty retreat?

In my perfect world, the Angels re-sign Tex, leaving only LAD as competition for Manny. Of course, if the Nat&#039;s sign Tex, they&#039;d probably wind up trading him to the Yankees in a few years and also pikcing up some of his salary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing&#8230;it seemed like odd timing to have John Henry, whose hedge funds have taken a beating in the current climate, talk about how the Red Sox and all of baseball would be negatively impacted by the economy. That doesn&#8217;t seem like a statement you make before signing an 8-yr/$180mn deal, which leads me to believe maybe the Red Sox are backing away from Tex. Perhaps, Henry&#8217;s comments are laying the way for a hasty retreat?</p>
<p>In my perfect world, the Angels re-sign Tex, leaving only LAD as competition for Manny. Of course, if the Nat&#8217;s sign Tex, they&#8217;d probably wind up trading him to the Yankees in a few years and also pikcing up some of his salary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65742</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65742</guid>
		<description>The more I&#039;ve thought about Cameron, the less enamored I was with the deal. While he would be a significant upgrade over last year, I think the Yankees can do better. Cashman needs to get creative here.

I am not sure where Rhoden is coming in his article. He makes it seem like Sabathia&#039;s stance on African Americans was controversial or cutting edge. It has pretty much become a baseball party line. Also, with Arod, Giambi, Joba, Damon, etc., the Yankees had some interesting personalities. Also, I&#039;d like to see Rhoden explain to Jeter, Posada and Mo that they don&#039;t have passion.

Back to Manny, I just don&#039;t see the risk. After reading all the horror stories about Manny last year, you would think that he was hitting .200 with the Red Sox. In reality, he was one of their best hitters at the time of the trade. If Manny&#039;s quitting mode is a 140 OPS+, that&#039;s not a warning sign, but an extra incentive.

As for the Yankees offense, I think everyone is making it out to be pathetic, when in fact it was a tad above average last season. I realize that Abreu (120 OPS+) and Giambi (128 OPS+) are being lost, but it is reasonable to expect a big jump from Cano and the catcher position, while Jeter and CF are also good bets to see a nice bump. Furthermore, Swisher has the potential to approximate or better what you are losing from Abreu, while a healthy Matsui could more than make up for Giambi. Does this offense, as constituted, have the potential to be a machine as they were in 2007? Not really, but that doesn&#039;t mean it won&#039;t be one of the league&#039;s best. Now, if they add a guy like Manny or Dunn, that could really take things to another level, but I don&#039;t see that as an absolute necessity.

By the way, the Yankees only scored 15 more runs than the first place Rays, which at least seems as relevant as scoring only 7 more runs than the last place Orioles. Kepner is usually very good, so it&#039;s a shame that he would resort to making a point like that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I&#8217;ve thought about Cameron, the less enamored I was with the deal. While he would be a significant upgrade over last year, I think the Yankees can do better. Cashman needs to get creative here.</p>
<p>I am not sure where Rhoden is coming in his article. He makes it seem like Sabathia&#8217;s stance on African Americans was controversial or cutting edge. It has pretty much become a baseball party line. Also, with Arod, Giambi, Joba, Damon, etc., the Yankees had some interesting personalities. Also, I&#8217;d like to see Rhoden explain to Jeter, Posada and Mo that they don&#8217;t have passion.</p>
<p>Back to Manny, I just don&#8217;t see the risk. After reading all the horror stories about Manny last year, you would think that he was hitting .200 with the Red Sox. In reality, he was one of their best hitters at the time of the trade. If Manny&#8217;s quitting mode is a 140 OPS+, that&#8217;s not a warning sign, but an extra incentive.</p>
<p>As for the Yankees offense, I think everyone is making it out to be pathetic, when in fact it was a tad above average last season. I realize that Abreu (120 OPS+) and Giambi (128 OPS+) are being lost, but it is reasonable to expect a big jump from Cano and the catcher position, while Jeter and CF are also good bets to see a nice bump. Furthermore, Swisher has the potential to approximate or better what you are losing from Abreu, while a healthy Matsui could more than make up for Giambi. Does this offense, as constituted, have the potential to be a machine as they were in 2007? Not really, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it won&#8217;t be one of the league&#8217;s best. Now, if they add a guy like Manny or Dunn, that could really take things to another level, but I don&#8217;t see that as an absolute necessity.</p>
<p>By the way, the Yankees only scored 15 more runs than the first place Rays, which at least seems as relevant as scoring only 7 more runs than the last place Orioles. Kepner is usually very good, so it&#8217;s a shame that he would resort to making a point like that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/18/news-of-the-day-121808/#comment-65741</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=6092#comment-65741</guid>
		<description>Thank God! no Cameron. Nothing against him, but trading a young Melky for one year of Cameron seems short-sided.

This could probably be said about many teams any year, but due to age, injury and a poor 2008, it&#039;s hard to know what we get from Matsui, JD, Jeter, Posada, Cano and our tag team CF of Melky and Brett. I guess you can throw Swish into that mix too. So aside from expecting about career average years from ARod and Nady, it&#039;s all guesswork. Certainly, talent and history wise, this is still a talented lineup. No big boppers sans ARod, but everyone short of CF could easily post .825 - .850 OPS&#039;s.

I keep thinking about 2 years of Bobby, but the truth is his defense all but nullifies his bat.

Wanna go high-risk, high-reward? How about Bonds? Barry Bonds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God! no Cameron. Nothing against him, but trading a young Melky for one year of Cameron seems short-sided.</p>
<p>This could probably be said about many teams any year, but due to age, injury and a poor 2008, it&#8217;s hard to know what we get from Matsui, JD, Jeter, Posada, Cano and our tag team CF of Melky and Brett. I guess you can throw Swish into that mix too. So aside from expecting about career average years from ARod and Nady, it&#8217;s all guesswork. Certainly, talent and history wise, this is still a talented lineup. No big boppers sans ARod, but everyone short of CF could easily post .825 &#8211; .850 OPS&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I keep thinking about 2 years of Bobby, but the truth is his defense all but nullifies his bat.</p>
<p>Wanna go high-risk, high-reward? How about Bonds? Barry Bonds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

