<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Makes Five</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:43:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251240</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251240</guid>
		<description>[44] I don&#039;t think you can really compare innings pitched across eras. The more pertinent thing to consider is the number of pitches thrown. Without the data to back it up, I am pretty sure that pitchers today throw a lot more pitches per inning than when the 4-man rotation was used. Whether it’s because of better hitters, a tighter strike zone, smaller ballparks, etc., getting three outs today is probably a lot harder than it used to be. If you could somehow reverse that trend, you could probably reconsider the 4-man rotation. Quite frankly, I don’t see such a reversal. In fact, I think it’s a lot more likely that we will see a 6-man rotation than a return to the 4-man rotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[44] I don&#8217;t think you can really compare innings pitched across eras. The more pertinent thing to consider is the number of pitches thrown. Without the data to back it up, I am pretty sure that pitchers today throw a lot more pitches per inning than when the 4-man rotation was used. Whether it’s because of better hitters, a tighter strike zone, smaller ballparks, etc., getting three outs today is probably a lot harder than it used to be. If you could somehow reverse that trend, you could probably reconsider the 4-man rotation. Quite frankly, I don’t see such a reversal. In fact, I think it’s a lot more likely that we will see a 6-man rotation than a return to the 4-man rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251239</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251239</guid>
		<description>[43] didn&#039;t E.Jackson go to Detroit?? is Leyland known for ignoring pitch counts as well??

[44] Great, will do. I do remember reading somewhere about David Cone throwing 150 pitches on more than one occasion..

the pitchers here in Japan are Seriously &quot;abused&quot;..Matsuzaka&#039;s famous &quot;Koshien National Tournament&quot; championship game was over 175 pitches..and he had pitched two days earlier, and he was 18 years old!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[43] didn&#8217;t E.Jackson go to Detroit?? is Leyland known for ignoring pitch counts as well??</p>
<p>[44] Great, will do. I do remember reading somewhere about David Cone throwing 150 pitches on more than one occasion..</p>
<p>the pitchers here in Japan are Seriously &#8220;abused&#8221;..Matsuzaka&#8217;s famous &#8220;Koshien National Tournament&#8221; championship game was over 175 pitches..and he had pitched two days earlier, and he was 18 years old!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251238</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251238</guid>
		<description>Right, it&#039;s bad for any pitcher of any age to throw too many pitches in a single game (search for articles on Pitcher Abuse Points, or get a copy of Baseball Prospectus 2007, which has an essay in the back that updates PAP), but if in-game workloads are not abusive, total innings in a season can go up to the required levels for a 4-man rotation without risk provided there&#039;s a build-up to those levels over the course of the previous seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, it&#8217;s bad for any pitcher of any age to throw too many pitches in a single game (search for articles on Pitcher Abuse Points, or get a copy of Baseball Prospectus 2007, which has an essay in the back that updates PAP), but if in-game workloads are not abusive, total innings in a season can go up to the required levels for a 4-man rotation without risk provided there&#8217;s a build-up to those levels over the course of the previous seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251237</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251237</guid>
		<description>[42] Poor, poor Edwin Jackson... just when it seemed like he was finally getting it together...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[42] Poor, poor Edwin Jackson&#8230; just when it seemed like he was finally getting it together&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251236</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251236</guid>
		<description>[40] The 4-man rotation would therefore be preferable as long as you don&#039;t go Dusty Baker on the pitch-counts..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[40] The 4-man rotation would therefore be preferable as long as you don&#8217;t go Dusty Baker on the pitch-counts..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251235</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251235</guid>
		<description>[40] Mature, but not (Randy Johnson) past prime?  Then again, Randy won a lot of games during the regular season, but seemed to age another twenty or so years around playoff time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[40] Mature, but not (Randy Johnson) past prime?  Then again, Randy won a lot of games during the regular season, but seemed to age another twenty or so years around playoff time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251234</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251234</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because of the five-man rotation. 

162 games divided by five pitchers is 32.4 starts. Even at eight innings per start that&#039;s only 259 2/3 innings. But 162 games divided by four is 40.5 starts, a pinch more than 7 1/3 innings per start in a four-man rotation would push an ace like Sabathia up to 300 frames. 

It&#039;s funny, because the same performance analysis that has lead to strict pitch counts and innings limits for young pitchers (based on evidence of workloads leading to injuries in the past) also argues in favor of four-man rotations for established starters as it would eliminate the often-replacement-level fifth starter and there&#039;s no evidence that pitching every four days is any harder on a mature pitching arm than pitching every five days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because of the five-man rotation. </p>
<p>162 games divided by five pitchers is 32.4 starts. Even at eight innings per start that&#8217;s only 259 2/3 innings. But 162 games divided by four is 40.5 starts, a pinch more than 7 1/3 innings per start in a four-man rotation would push an ace like Sabathia up to 300 frames. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, because the same performance analysis that has lead to strict pitch counts and innings limits for young pitchers (based on evidence of workloads leading to injuries in the past) also argues in favor of four-man rotations for established starters as it would eliminate the often-replacement-level fifth starter and there&#8217;s no evidence that pitching every four days is any harder on a mature pitching arm than pitching every five days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251233</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251233</guid>
		<description>[37] [38] Thanks for that, makes sense. 

Amazing to look back though and see guys throwing 300 innings..doubtful that will ever happen again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[37] [38] Thanks for that, makes sense. </p>
<p>Amazing to look back though and see guys throwing 300 innings..doubtful that will ever happen again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251232</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251232</guid>
		<description>[36] There has been some research (most notably by Tom Verducci when not writing books) suggesting that suddent innings spikes at early ages disproportionately leads to injuries. In Joba&#039;s case, it&#039;s important to remember that he did not have a long college or minor league career, so I think the Yankees are wise to take it easy with him. With Pettitte on board and Hughes in the wings, I think the Yankees can afford to be cautious. Also, it&#039;s important to remember that Pettitte has signed a one-year deal, meaning Hughes really isn&#039;t a plan-B, but more like a 2010 plan-A in waiting. Now, instead of trying to ease two youngsters into the rotation, the Yankees can groom Hughes at AAA, knowing he can step this year if needed, but targeting 2010 for his full-time ascension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[36] There has been some research (most notably by Tom Verducci when not writing books) suggesting that suddent innings spikes at early ages disproportionately leads to injuries. In Joba&#8217;s case, it&#8217;s important to remember that he did not have a long college or minor league career, so I think the Yankees are wise to take it easy with him. With Pettitte on board and Hughes in the wings, I think the Yankees can afford to be cautious. Also, it&#8217;s important to remember that Pettitte has signed a one-year deal, meaning Hughes really isn&#8217;t a plan-B, but more like a 2010 plan-A in waiting. Now, instead of trying to ease two youngsters into the rotation, the Yankees can groom Hughes at AAA, knowing he can step this year if needed, but targeting 2010 for his full-time ascension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251231</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251231</guid>
		<description>Tokyo, read the Verducci piece I link to above.

It&#039;s about conditioning. He&#039;s just not stretched out, and players under 25 are still maturing physically so you have to be careful about extending them significantly past what they&#039;ve been conditioned to do in the past. Pitching is a very unnatural act. Once he&#039;s built up, like CC has been, he should be able to go 230-odd innings annually, but it takes a few years to get to that point and to get him out of what they call &quot;the injury nexus,&quot; which is that less-than-25-years-old period.

Put it this way, just because somebody&#039;s tall, thin, and leanly muscular doesn&#039;t mean they could go out and run a marathon without training for it first. And you can&#039;t go from running a 10K to running a marathon without some intermittent training either. Throwing 200+ innings in a season is like running a marathon, you have to build up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tokyo, read the Verducci piece I link to above.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about conditioning. He&#8217;s just not stretched out, and players under 25 are still maturing physically so you have to be careful about extending them significantly past what they&#8217;ve been conditioned to do in the past. Pitching is a very unnatural act. Once he&#8217;s built up, like CC has been, he should be able to go 230-odd innings annually, but it takes a few years to get to that point and to get him out of what they call &#8220;the injury nexus,&#8221; which is that less-than-25-years-old period.</p>
<p>Put it this way, just because somebody&#8217;s tall, thin, and leanly muscular doesn&#8217;t mean they could go out and run a marathon without training for it first. And you can&#8217;t go from running a 10K to running a marathon without some intermittent training either. Throwing 200+ innings in a season is like running a marathon, you have to build up to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251230</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251230</guid>
		<description>[35] Always stockpile arms and assume injuries will happen!  

I know this has been covered before, but I still don&#039;t get it..Joba looks like a Mack truck, is his arm that fragile that he can&#039;t even pitch 180 innings at this point?? Perhaps someone can point me to some reading material about pitchers arm strength and development..obviously each individual is different, but it just seems like they are babying him a bit..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[35] Always stockpile arms and assume injuries will happen!  </p>
<p>I know this has been covered before, but I still don&#8217;t get it..Joba looks like a Mack truck, is his arm that fragile that he can&#8217;t even pitch 180 innings at this point?? Perhaps someone can point me to some reading material about pitchers arm strength and development..obviously each individual is different, but it just seems like they are babying him a bit..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251229</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251229</guid>
		<description>[34] Yeah... but what happens if something completely stupid happens, like AJ making 30+ starts?  I kinda think that the only reason they get Sheets at this point is if Joba is forced back in the pen because of some fluke accident to a present reliever, and that&#039;s if he doesn&#039;t sign with Texas first.  

We kid about AJ and Sheets, but you know, I don&#039;t want to speculate that they will get injured.  Besides, we have a plethora of options at AAA for spot duty.  If Cash wasn&#039;t afraid of Sheets&#039; injury report, he&#039;d be here already...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[34] Yeah&#8230; but what happens if something completely stupid happens, like AJ making 30+ starts?  I kinda think that the only reason they get Sheets at this point is if Joba is forced back in the pen because of some fluke accident to a present reliever, and that&#8217;s if he doesn&#8217;t sign with Texas first.  </p>
<p>We kid about AJ and Sheets, but you know, I don&#8217;t want to speculate that they will get injured.  Besides, we have a plethora of options at AAA for spot duty.  If Cash wasn&#8217;t afraid of Sheets&#8217; injury report, he&#8217;d be here already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251228</guid>
		<description>[33] I&#039;m not Sweating the Technique, Rakim, but not being a techie got no idea what you mean there... :) 

Ben Sheets is STILL out there, right? Would love to see the Yanks offer the same deal Andy got to Sheets..then the rotation would be:
CC
AJ/Sheets (18-20 starts each with all the injuries)
Wang
Andy P
Joba
Phil

add it up and you get 100 wins...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[33] I&#8217;m not Sweating the Technique, Rakim, but not being a techie got no idea what you mean there&#8230; <img src='http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Ben Sheets is STILL out there, right? Would love to see the Yanks offer the same deal Andy got to Sheets..then the rotation would be:<br />
CC<br />
AJ/Sheets (18-20 starts each with all the injuries)<br />
Wang<br />
Andy P<br />
Joba<br />
Phil</p>
<p>add it up and you get 100 wins&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251227</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251227</guid>
		<description>[29] Hey man, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96sFW-3vGv4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ya can&#039;t knock the hustle!&lt;/a&gt; &gt;;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[29] Hey man, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96sFW-3vGv4" rel="nofollow">ya can&#8217;t knock the hustle!</a> &gt;;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251226</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251226</guid>
		<description>I hope these guys, especially the new hurlers, throw at opposing batters when our guys get hit for a change! That&#039;s the only thing I&#039;m not going to miss about Moose.

I wonder who is going to help out at ST this year? Has that information been published yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope these guys, especially the new hurlers, throw at opposing batters when our guys get hit for a change! That&#8217;s the only thing I&#8217;m not going to miss about Moose.</p>
<p>I wonder who is going to help out at ST this year? Has that information been published yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251225</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251225</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I have to agree with BR somewhat on AJ. $18m for 170 IP of a league-averagish ERA is a bit depressing. If he is ‘that bad’, maybe we can pull a bit of Andy’s incentives out of that $18m?&lt;/b&gt;

From fangraphs;

&lt;i&gt;Thanks to the new Marcel projections that were just added to the site last night, we can estimate Burnett’s 2009 performance pretty easily. Marcel projects him at 187 innings with a 3.87 FIP for next year, but we’ll round that to 190 innings and a 3.90 FIP just to make the math easier. Once again, we’re going to use a 5.50 FIP as replacement level for a starter and cap his innings at 160, and use a 4.50 FIP as replacement level for a reliever, who will make up the 30 inning difference. So here are the totals that we’re projecting:

Burnett: 190 innings, 82 runs allowed
Replacement Level Starter: 160 innings, 98 runs allowed
Replacement Level Reliever: 30 innings, 15 runs allowed

We’re projecting the replacement level pitchers to allow 113 runs, or 31 more than what we’re projecting for Burnett. That would translate to +3 wins for whoever signs him. We can once again add a bit of a bonus to account for his extra innings saving the bullpen, so let’s call Burnett a +3.3 win pitcher.

3.3 wins * 5.5 million per win = $18.15 million in projected 2009 value. We again factor in a 10% discount rate to make up for the fact that he’s going to get a long term deal, and that gives us an annual average value of $16.4 million. Given Burnett’s history, it’s unlikely he’ll get more than four or five years. That puts his projected contract at 4 years/$66 million or 5 years/$82 million.&lt;/i&gt;

A.J. Burnett was signed to a five-year, $82.5M contract.

Not bad how the math works out, eh? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I have to agree with BR somewhat on AJ. $18m for 170 IP of a league-averagish ERA is a bit depressing. If he is ‘that bad’, maybe we can pull a bit of Andy’s incentives out of that $18m?</b></p>
<p>From fangraphs;</p>
<p><i>Thanks to the new Marcel projections that were just added to the site last night, we can estimate Burnett’s 2009 performance pretty easily. Marcel projects him at 187 innings with a 3.87 FIP for next year, but we’ll round that to 190 innings and a 3.90 FIP just to make the math easier. Once again, we’re going to use a 5.50 FIP as replacement level for a starter and cap his innings at 160, and use a 4.50 FIP as replacement level for a reliever, who will make up the 30 inning difference. So here are the totals that we’re projecting:</p>
<p>Burnett: 190 innings, 82 runs allowed<br />
Replacement Level Starter: 160 innings, 98 runs allowed<br />
Replacement Level Reliever: 30 innings, 15 runs allowed</p>
<p>We’re projecting the replacement level pitchers to allow 113 runs, or 31 more than what we’re projecting for Burnett. That would translate to +3 wins for whoever signs him. We can once again add a bit of a bonus to account for his extra innings saving the bullpen, so let’s call Burnett a +3.3 win pitcher.</p>
<p>3.3 wins * 5.5 million per win = $18.15 million in projected 2009 value. We again factor in a 10% discount rate to make up for the fact that he’s going to get a long term deal, and that gives us an annual average value of $16.4 million. Given Burnett’s history, it’s unlikely he’ll get more than four or five years. That puts his projected contract at 4 years/$66 million or 5 years/$82 million.</i></p>
<p>A.J. Burnett was signed to a five-year, $82.5M contract.</p>
<p>Not bad how the math works out, eh? <img src='http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ms october</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251224</link>
		<dc:creator>ms october</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251224</guid>
		<description>[28] thanks chyll - and good headline :}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[28] thanks chyll &#8211; and good headline :}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251223</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251223</guid>
		<description>Check Chyll gaming the system!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456&amp;cp=1#comment-90435&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OYF&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;$18m for 170 IP of a league-averagish ERA is a bit depressing. &quot;  Why do you think I was so pissed off when they signed him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check Chyll gaming the system!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456&#038;cp=1#comment-90435" rel="nofollow">OYF</a>: &#8220;$18m for 170 IP of a league-averagish ERA is a bit depressing. &#8221;  Why do you think I was so pissed off when they signed him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251222</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251222</guid>
		<description>[25] Try this hyperlink code: 

[a href(equal sign) &quot;http(colon, double-backslash)yankees dot lhblogs dot com(backslash)2009(backslash)01(backslash)27(backslash)wright-is-designated(backslash)&quot;]
Chase-ed Wright Off The 40-man[/a]

&lt;b&gt;key:&lt;/b&gt;
[ is  Less-than sign
] is Greater-than sign
(backslash) is /
(colon) is : 
dot is .
(equal sign) is =

&lt;a href=&quot;http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2009/01/27/wright-is-designated/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Chase-d Wright Off The 40-man&lt;/a&gt;

I copy and paste whatever text and link into an existing example of a hyperlink code, as this is easy to forget unless you&#039;re an HTML coder (wowzers...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[25] Try this hyperlink code: </p>
<p>[a href(equal sign) "http(colon, double-backslash)yankees dot lhblogs dot com(backslash)2009(backslash)01(backslash)27(backslash)wright-is-designated(backslash)"]<br />
Chase-ed Wright Off The 40-man[/a]</p>
<p><b>key:</b><br />
[ is  Less-than sign<br />
] is Greater-than sign<br />
(backslash) is /<br />
(colon) is :<br />
dot is .<br />
(equal sign) is =</p>
<p><a href="http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2009/01/27/wright-is-designated/" rel="nofollow"><br />
Chase-d Wright Off The 40-man</a></p>
<p>I copy and paste whatever text and link into an existing example of a hyperlink code, as this is easy to forget unless you&#8217;re an HTML coder (wowzers&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichiganYankee</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/01/27/andy-makes-five/#comment-251220</link>
		<dc:creator>MichiganYankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7456#comment-251220</guid>
		<description>As Steve Goldman states, Pettitte in the rotation is now Plan A while &quot;the kids&quot; have been relegated to Plan B.  It seems that it ought to be the other way around, as Pettitte&#039;s contract is perfectly structured to be an insurance policy.  

Let the kids fight it out for the #5 spot and slot Pettitte as the swing man.  If the kids are all ineffective or if one of the starters becomes injured, Andy is available to provide lots of league-average-or-better innings.  If the Yanks don&#039;t need much of Pettitte in the rotation, they won&#039;t have to pay more than the base salary and roster time.  If he ends up contributing as a rotation regular, they&#039;ll pay him like one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Steve Goldman states, Pettitte in the rotation is now Plan A while &#8220;the kids&#8221; have been relegated to Plan B.  It seems that it ought to be the other way around, as Pettitte&#8217;s contract is perfectly structured to be an insurance policy.  </p>
<p>Let the kids fight it out for the #5 spot and slot Pettitte as the swing man.  If the kids are all ineffective or if one of the starters becomes injured, Andy is available to provide lots of league-average-or-better innings.  If the Yanks don&#8217;t need much of Pettitte in the rotation, they won&#8217;t have to pay more than the base salary and roster time.  If he ends up contributing as a rotation regular, they&#8217;ll pay him like one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
