<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News of the Day &#8211; 2/2/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/</link>
	<description>Baseball Blog by Alex Belth about the Yankees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90945</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90945</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;And somehow, looking at Mo’s stats, and knowing how many times he has saved our bacon, I can not be confortable with ever calling him a failure.&lt;/b&gt;

No one is calling him a failure.  In my case, I&#039;m simply saying he failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>And somehow, looking at Mo’s stats, and knowing how many times he has saved our bacon, I can not be confortable with ever calling him a failure.</b></p>
<p>No one is calling him a failure.  In my case, I&#8217;m simply saying he failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90941</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90941</guid>
		<description>Right, but if you&#039;re using the nomenclature of succeed/fail, when they don&#039;t succeed, logically, they fail. Semantical objections may apply so if there&#039;s a better term I&#039;ll go along with it.

Mariano Rivera is a legendary, amazing player, but he&#039;s not perfect. In fact as I mentioned before, not calling a spade a spade vis a vis the times he&#039;s fai--- errr came up short (?) takes away from his accomplishments, which are pretty darned impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, but if you&#8217;re using the nomenclature of succeed/fail, when they don&#8217;t succeed, logically, they fail. Semantical objections may apply so if there&#8217;s a better term I&#8217;ll go along with it.</p>
<p>Mariano Rivera is a legendary, amazing player, but he&#8217;s not perfect. In fact as I mentioned before, not calling a spade a spade vis a vis the times he&#8217;s fai&#8212; errr came up short (?) takes away from his accomplishments, which are pretty darned impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90937</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90937</guid>
		<description>The idea of assigning the loss of a 7 game series to one player because of 1 or 2 events out of 100, is NUTS. I really thought that went out with Bill Buckner.

And somehow, looking at Mo&#039;s stats, and knowing how many times he has saved our bacon, I can not be confortable with ever calling him a failure.

If in a year of 600 AB,  a player bats .500 and posts an OBP of .600, while  it may be technically correct, is it really an accurate and descriptive statement to say &#039;he failed&#039; 40% of the time? To say he failed, is to imply we expected success. Players don&#039;t succeed 100% of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of assigning the loss of a 7 game series to one player because of 1 or 2 events out of 100, is NUTS. I really thought that went out with Bill Buckner.</p>
<p>And somehow, looking at Mo&#8217;s stats, and knowing how many times he has saved our bacon, I can not be confortable with ever calling him a failure.</p>
<p>If in a year of 600 AB,  a player bats .500 and posts an OBP of .600, while  it may be technically correct, is it really an accurate and descriptive statement to say &#8216;he failed&#8217; 40% of the time? To say he failed, is to imply we expected success. Players don&#8217;t succeed 100% of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90932</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90932</guid>
		<description>[54] I did &quot;mis-speak&quot; about &#039;04, but the point remains the same. 

As far as you not thinking anyone wants to gloss over Rivera&#039;s role in the losses, I suggest you read through these comments one more time!

If you do, btw, you will also see that I am record as saying Mussina is being too harsh, too. The bottom line here though is if you count 97 as a failure on Mo&#039;s part - which it was, I think, pretty obviously - then you count &#039;04 too - not just &#039;01. So that adds up to two post-season moments - or three if you count 04&#039;s game 5 - after Musssina arrived, vs one before he arrived. 

I mean, if throwing the exact losing pitch in a series is the only thing considered Rivera&#039;s fault, then yeah, he&#039;s perfect except in &#039;01.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[54] I did &#8220;mis-speak&#8221; about &#8217;04, but the point remains the same. </p>
<p>As far as you not thinking anyone wants to gloss over Rivera&#8217;s role in the losses, I suggest you read through these comments one more time!</p>
<p>If you do, btw, you will also see that I am record as saying Mussina is being too harsh, too. The bottom line here though is if you count 97 as a failure on Mo&#8217;s part &#8211; which it was, I think, pretty obviously &#8211; then you count &#8217;04 too &#8211; not just &#8217;01. So that adds up to two post-season moments &#8211; or three if you count 04&#8242;s game 5 &#8211; after Musssina arrived, vs one before he arrived. </p>
<p>I mean, if throwing the exact losing pitch in a series is the only thing considered Rivera&#8217;s fault, then yeah, he&#8217;s perfect except in &#8217;01.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90927</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90927</guid>
		<description>[53] Did somebody say &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=ap-congress-citifield&amp;prov=ap&amp;type=lgns&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Citi Field??&lt;/a&gt; &gt;;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[53] Did somebody say <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=ap-congress-citifield&amp;prov=ap&amp;type=lgns" rel="nofollow">Citi Field??</a> &gt;;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyahennystutu</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90926</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyahennystutu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90926</guid>
		<description>Oops, sorry, was responding to [54] in [55], my bad ref&#039;ing to [52]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, sorry, was responding to [54] in [55], my bad ref&#8217;ing to [52]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyahennystutu</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90925</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyahennystutu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90925</guid>
		<description>[52]  I think you&#039;re choosing to believe that Mussina &quot;boils everything down&quot; to Mariano&#039;s performances.  And you may be right, but I don&#039;t know, and my guess is that unless you&#039;re the author(s) of the book and actually performed the interview(s) which led to the more &#039;interesting&#039; quotes from Mussina, you&#039;ll never really know either.  

Maybe they discussed everyone on the roster for the last 8 seasons, in depth, over the course of 50 hours of conversations.  Or maybe these quotes are basically &quot;everything&quot; Mussina had to say.  Regardless of how Verducci and Torre couch it in the book, we&#039;ll never really know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[52]  I think you&#8217;re choosing to believe that Mussina &#8220;boils everything down&#8221; to Mariano&#8217;s performances.  And you may be right, but I don&#8217;t know, and my guess is that unless you&#8217;re the author(s) of the book and actually performed the interview(s) which led to the more &#8216;interesting&#8217; quotes from Mussina, you&#8217;ll never really know either.  </p>
<p>Maybe they discussed everyone on the roster for the last 8 seasons, in depth, over the course of 50 hours of conversations.  Or maybe these quotes are basically &#8220;everything&#8221; Mussina had to say.  Regardless of how Verducci and Torre couch it in the book, we&#8217;ll never really know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonnystrongleg</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90922</link>
		<dc:creator>jonnystrongleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90922</guid>
		<description>[52] I don&#039;t think anybody wants to gloss over Mariano&#039;s role in the losses. Nor give him all the credit for the wins.

The point is that MUSSINA boils everything down to Mariano&#039;s performances, which is absurd, especially given his own poor outings have been a bigger factor in the Yanks recent post season struggles than Rivera&#039;s.

You also said the Yanks lost 2 world series on his watch, which they didn&#039;t. The 04 series was the ALCS and they still had 4 chances to win after his only poor outing of the series. mariano faltered and then the team as a whole could not summon a victory from tie-game top of the 10th in game 4 thru game 7. mariano should take a lot of blame for that, but not nearly the blame that mussina wants to assign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[52] I don&#8217;t think anybody wants to gloss over Mariano&#8217;s role in the losses. Nor give him all the credit for the wins.</p>
<p>The point is that MUSSINA boils everything down to Mariano&#8217;s performances, which is absurd, especially given his own poor outings have been a bigger factor in the Yanks recent post season struggles than Rivera&#8217;s.</p>
<p>You also said the Yanks lost 2 world series on his watch, which they didn&#8217;t. The 04 series was the ALCS and they still had 4 chances to win after his only poor outing of the series. mariano faltered and then the team as a whole could not summon a victory from tie-game top of the 10th in game 4 thru game 7. mariano should take a lot of blame for that, but not nearly the blame that mussina wants to assign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90921</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90921</guid>
		<description>[50]

Over-pa-id .... over-pa-id .... over-pa-id ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[50]</p>
<p>Over-pa-id &#8230;. over-pa-id &#8230;. over-pa-id &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/02/02/news-of-the-day-2209/comment-page-2/#comment-90920</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=7627#comment-90920</guid>
		<description>[47] They can take responsibility for themselves, and Mo can for himself. When I say on his watch, I mean his job is to protect a lead (or tie), so when he&#039;s doing his job it&#039;s &quot;on his watch&quot;. 

It makes no sense to give credit to Rivera for his part in Yankee success without recognizing he also contributed to Yankee failure. If anything it&#039;s testament to his status that he has been that kind of fulcrum for the team for so long. (Though in the post-season it hasn&#039;t really been the case as much of late!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[47] They can take responsibility for themselves, and Mo can for himself. When I say on his watch, I mean his job is to protect a lead (or tie), so when he&#8217;s doing his job it&#8217;s &#8220;on his watch&#8221;. </p>
<p>It makes no sense to give credit to Rivera for his part in Yankee success without recognizing he also contributed to Yankee failure. If anything it&#8217;s testament to his status that he has been that kind of fulcrum for the team for so long. (Though in the post-season it hasn&#8217;t really been the case as much of late!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
