<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News of the Day &#8211; 3/4/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155934</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155934</guid>
		<description>[39] Dude, of course I&#039;m not saying they cancel each other out stat-wise. Are you kidding me? You think I smoke crack rocks all day long or what! I&#039;m saying they are both &lt;b&gt;high maintenance&lt;/b&gt;. Sheesh.

And I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about re: 2007. I never said I didn&#039;t see how they got to the playoffs with A Rod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[39] Dude, of course I&#8217;m not saying they cancel each other out stat-wise. Are you kidding me? You think I smoke crack rocks all day long or what! I&#8217;m saying they are both <b>high maintenance</b>. Sheesh.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about re: 2007. I never said I didn&#8217;t see how they got to the playoffs with A Rod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155933</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155933</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t feel sorry for the guys making &quot;only&quot; $30K for their minor league deals. If they progress through the system as planned, and they get a September call up, they get 1/12 of the major league minimum $400K or $33K more for that one month whether they play or not. $66K plus meal money and free equipment and hotel rooms is not a tough way to make a living for seven months if your up side is getting the major league minimum during any time of the year. They get thousands more per day at that level for meals to stick in their pocket as well. I&#039;d feel more for the guys that never make it to the show and have to get a &quot;real job&quot; like most of the rest of us. Their $30K is all they get, but it&#039;s still for half of the year.

Source: Rheal Cormier was my next-door neighbor during his salad days in the Cardinals&#039; system in Louisville, KY. He didn&#039;t do too badly for a wrong-sided hockey playin&#039; Canuck from New Brunswick! I always made fun of him by telling him it was too cold for baseball way the hell up in Moncton, New Brunswick and that he learned the game in and was really from New Brunswick, New Jersey! He would go on to an undistinguished, but profitable $25M plus major league career pitching past his 40th birthday.

LOL @ The Moncton Missile!

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t feel sorry for the guys making &#8220;only&#8221; $30K for their minor league deals. If they progress through the system as planned, and they get a September call up, they get 1/12 of the major league minimum $400K or $33K more for that one month whether they play or not. $66K plus meal money and free equipment and hotel rooms is not a tough way to make a living for seven months if your up side is getting the major league minimum during any time of the year. They get thousands more per day at that level for meals to stick in their pocket as well. I&#8217;d feel more for the guys that never make it to the show and have to get a &#8220;real job&#8221; like most of the rest of us. Their $30K is all they get, but it&#8217;s still for half of the year.</p>
<p>Source: Rheal Cormier was my next-door neighbor during his salad days in the Cardinals&#8217; system in Louisville, KY. He didn&#8217;t do too badly for a wrong-sided hockey playin&#8217; Canuck from New Brunswick! I always made fun of him by telling him it was too cold for baseball way the hell up in Moncton, New Brunswick and that he learned the game in and was really from New Brunswick, New Jersey! He would go on to an undistinguished, but profitable $25M plus major league career pitching past his 40th birthday.</p>
<p>LOL @ The Moncton Missile!<br />
 <img src='http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start Spreading the News</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155932</link>
		<dc:creator>Start Spreading the News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155932</guid>
		<description>[38] &quot;my point was I’d rather Reyes replace A Rod than Jeter and how the former two are high-maintenance, and Jeter’s anything but. So they’d cancel each other out in that regard (with some improvement, actually).&quot;

I have used a few stats to show that what you have said is NOT true. They don&#039;t cancel out. And Reyes is certainly not an improvement over Arod in any category except steals. 

If you don&#039;t see how the Yanks got to the playoffs in 2007 WITH Arod (instead of say, Reyes), then I am really curious to see what stats you use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[38] &#8220;my point was I’d rather Reyes replace A Rod than Jeter and how the former two are high-maintenance, and Jeter’s anything but. So they’d cancel each other out in that regard (with some improvement, actually).&#8221;</p>
<p>I have used a few stats to show that what you have said is NOT true. They don&#8217;t cancel out. And Reyes is certainly not an improvement over Arod in any category except steals. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t see how the Yanks got to the playoffs in 2007 WITH Arod (instead of say, Reyes), then I am really curious to see what stats you use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155931</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155931</guid>
		<description>[36] It wasn&#039;t slugging - and I may have added fuel to that unfortunate fire - but A Rod, and how necessary he is. I brought up the 98 team merely as an example of how well it&#039;s possible to do without a player like that. Of course it got turned into an argument of overall team OPS vs a certain individual&#039;s OPS - [37] a stat I think is overrated and at times misleading on an individual basis, never mind for a team; I certainly didn&#039;t bring it up - and other apples and oranges questions.

I&#039;ll also add that however runs per game your worth, when those runs happen is also important. If that number is weighted towards blowouts in either direction, it loses some of its luster.

Anyway my point was I&#039;d rather Reyes replace A Rod than Jeter and how the former two are high-maintenance, and Jeter&#039;s anything but. So they&#039;d cancel each other out in that regard (with some improvement, actually). Then the question put was how in the world a team could survive without A Rod and I&#039;m saying it could happen. In fact, I&#039;m wondering more how the team survives WITH him, his OPS notwithstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[36] It wasn&#8217;t slugging &#8211; and I may have added fuel to that unfortunate fire &#8211; but A Rod, and how necessary he is. I brought up the 98 team merely as an example of how well it&#8217;s possible to do without a player like that. Of course it got turned into an argument of overall team OPS vs a certain individual&#8217;s OPS &#8211; [37] a stat I think is overrated and at times misleading on an individual basis, never mind for a team; I certainly didn&#8217;t bring it up &#8211; and other apples and oranges questions.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also add that however runs per game your worth, when those runs happen is also important. If that number is weighted towards blowouts in either direction, it loses some of its luster.</p>
<p>Anyway my point was I&#8217;d rather Reyes replace A Rod than Jeter and how the former two are high-maintenance, and Jeter&#8217;s anything but. So they&#8217;d cancel each other out in that regard (with some improvement, actually). Then the question put was how in the world a team could survive without A Rod and I&#8217;m saying it could happen. In fact, I&#8217;m wondering more how the team survives WITH him, his OPS notwithstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155930</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155930</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;And for the love of all that’s holy no one is debating their ability to get on base.&lt;/b&gt;

If people are introducing the OPS stat, why not break it down, since OBP is part of the equation?

&lt;b&gt;Post 2003, we’ve had an average ERA+ of 99. I wonder if that explains our PS failures.&lt;/b&gt;

It&#039;s a combination of things; the Yanks have failed in all aspects of the game; pitching, offense, defense.

[36] You may also want to add defense to the equation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>And for the love of all that’s holy no one is debating their ability to get on base.</b></p>
<p>If people are introducing the OPS stat, why not break it down, since OBP is part of the equation?</p>
<p><b>Post 2003, we’ve had an average ERA+ of 99. I wonder if that explains our PS failures.</b></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a combination of things; the Yanks have failed in all aspects of the game; pitching, offense, defense.</p>
<p>[36] You may also want to add defense to the equation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start Spreading the News</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155929</link>
		<dc:creator>Start Spreading the News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155929</guid>
		<description>[33]&quot;And for the love of all that’s holy no one is debating their ability to get on base.&quot;

True, I think we are generally talking about their slugging. Slugging by definition is not limited to home runs. So the 1998 Yanks didn&#039;t need a 50+ homer guy to help them be a good slugging team. They did have four guys who hit 20+ homers and TEN guys who hit 10+ homers. That&#039;s pretty good slugging, if you ask me. That team could hit a homer at any time, especially considering Yankee Stadium&#039;s pitcher friendly park factor.

Plus Tino was a guy who hit 44 homers the year before. Bernie was routinely between 25 and 30. I think they were considered &quot;serious HR threats.&quot;

Still, if your earlier point is that we should get rid of Arod and replace with Jose Reyes, then you should also address where we are going to make up the difference. But how much is the difference?

OPS and Total bases don&#039;t take into account steals and avoid double plays (two things Reyes does better than Arod). So we can use Runs Created which &quot;involves some positive value for things like hits, walks, steals, home runs, etc. and negative values for outs, caught stealing and GIDP.&quot; That stat should portray Reyes in a more positive light than traditional stats.

Still, Arod has 8.3 career Runs Created per Game compared to Reyes&#039; 5.5. How big is that 2.8 RC/g differential? To put it in context, the dropoff from Arod to Reyes is bigger than the dropoff of 2006 Robinson Cano superstar (6.6) and 2008 Robinson Cano suckfest (4.0).

Making up that difference in offense is hard when this team gets as injured as often as it does as the players age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[33]&#8220;And for the love of all that’s holy no one is debating their ability to get on base.&#8221;</p>
<p>True, I think we are generally talking about their slugging. Slugging by definition is not limited to home runs. So the 1998 Yanks didn&#8217;t need a 50+ homer guy to help them be a good slugging team. They did have four guys who hit 20+ homers and TEN guys who hit 10+ homers. That&#8217;s pretty good slugging, if you ask me. That team could hit a homer at any time, especially considering Yankee Stadium&#8217;s pitcher friendly park factor.</p>
<p>Plus Tino was a guy who hit 44 homers the year before. Bernie was routinely between 25 and 30. I think they were considered &#8220;serious HR threats.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still, if your earlier point is that we should get rid of Arod and replace with Jose Reyes, then you should also address where we are going to make up the difference. But how much is the difference?</p>
<p>OPS and Total bases don&#8217;t take into account steals and avoid double plays (two things Reyes does better than Arod). So we can use Runs Created which &#8220;involves some positive value for things like hits, walks, steals, home runs, etc. and negative values for outs, caught stealing and GIDP.&#8221; That stat should portray Reyes in a more positive light than traditional stats.</p>
<p>Still, Arod has 8.3 career Runs Created per Game compared to Reyes&#8217; 5.5. How big is that 2.8 RC/g differential? To put it in context, the dropoff from Arod to Reyes is bigger than the dropoff of 2006 Robinson Cano superstar (6.6) and 2008 Robinson Cano suckfest (4.0).</p>
<p>Making up that difference in offense is hard when this team gets as injured as often as it does as the players age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155928</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155928</guid>
		<description>he sure is a ahbdy guy to have around... or
he sure is a HANDY guy to have around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he sure is a ahbdy guy to have around&#8230; or<br />
he sure is a HANDY guy to have around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155927</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155927</guid>
		<description>[28] If I might add:
Off. OPS+ / ERA+
2008 101 / 104
2007 118 / 99
2006 112 / 102
2005 115 / 93
2004 112 / 96
2003 115 /109
2002 114 / 114
2001 100 / 111
2000 104 / 101
1999 110 / 114
1998 117 / 117
1997 108 / 117
1996 100 / 108

To note: 
Certainly, we had an awesome team in 1998. 
If you give pitching an edge. the 2008 team was better then the 2000 team.
1999 and 2003 were tough years to lose the playoffs.
We don&#039;t mke the PS in 2007 without ARod.
Post 2003, we&#039;ve had an average ERA+ of 99. I wonder if that explains our PS failures.

And Hawk... No, you don&#039;t really NEED an ARod type force on a team with an ERA+ in the 110 range. But with a team ERA+ in the 100 range, he sure is a ahbdy guy to have around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[28] If I might add:<br />
Off. OPS+ / ERA+<br />
2008 101 / 104<br />
2007 118 / 99<br />
2006 112 / 102<br />
2005 115 / 93<br />
2004 112 / 96<br />
2003 115 /109<br />
2002 114 / 114<br />
2001 100 / 111<br />
2000 104 / 101<br />
1999 110 / 114<br />
1998 117 / 117<br />
1997 108 / 117<br />
1996 100 / 108</p>
<p>To note:<br />
Certainly, we had an awesome team in 1998.<br />
If you give pitching an edge. the 2008 team was better then the 2000 team.<br />
1999 and 2003 were tough years to lose the playoffs.<br />
We don&#8217;t mke the PS in 2007 without ARod.<br />
Post 2003, we&#8217;ve had an average ERA+ of 99. I wonder if that explains our PS failures.</p>
<p>And Hawk&#8230; No, you don&#8217;t really NEED an ARod type force on a team with an ERA+ in the 110 range. But with a team ERA+ in the 100 range, he sure is a ahbdy guy to have around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155926</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155926</guid>
		<description>And yet I&#039;m fairly certain not one of those players hit 30 HRs. When I&#039;m talking about sluggers in this sense I mean a la Giambi or A Rod (who once again is the basis for this discussion), serious HR threats. I&#039;m not talking about line drive double in the gap guys ...

I mean I know I&#039;m not alone in the world in my view, but if I&#039;m on the other side of some line here that dictates the late 1990s championship Yankees teams were power hitting powerhouses I can deal with that. To me it&#039;s bizarro world if they are considered that. They had no A Rod or A Rod type player, and they succeeded; that&#039;s my point. They didn&#039;t NEED that one or two mashers. A good, balanced team shouldn&#039;t.

And for the love of all that&#039;s holy no one is debating their ability to get on base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet I&#8217;m fairly certain not one of those players hit 30 HRs. When I&#8217;m talking about sluggers in this sense I mean a la Giambi or A Rod (who once again is the basis for this discussion), serious HR threats. I&#8217;m not talking about line drive double in the gap guys &#8230;</p>
<p>I mean I know I&#8217;m not alone in the world in my view, but if I&#8217;m on the other side of some line here that dictates the late 1990s championship Yankees teams were power hitting powerhouses I can deal with that. To me it&#8217;s bizarro world if they are considered that. They had no A Rod or A Rod type player, and they succeeded; that&#8217;s my point. They didn&#8217;t NEED that one or two mashers. A good, balanced team shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>And for the love of all that&#8217;s holy no one is debating their ability to get on base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155925</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155925</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;And we saw them thrive when slugger-less.&lt;/b&gt;

I don&#039;t think there ever was a time the Yanks were &quot;slugger-less.&quot;  Bernie, Tino, O&#039;Neill, Strawberry, to name a few slugged over .500 a few times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>And we saw them thrive when slugger-less.</b></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there ever was a time the Yanks were &#8220;slugger-less.&#8221;  Bernie, Tino, O&#8217;Neill, Strawberry, to name a few slugged over .500 a few times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155924</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155924</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In a general sense, the 1998 team had no real power and still had a dominant offense. Their offense had little to do with slugging, but it was about as even a team as you could ask for.&lt;/b&gt;

FWIW, they led the league in OBP (.362), and were 4th in the league in SLG (.460), finishing behind Seattle (.468), Boston (.463) &amp; Texas (.462).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In a general sense, the 1998 team had no real power and still had a dominant offense. Their offense had little to do with slugging, but it was about as even a team as you could ask for.</b></p>
<p>FWIW, they led the league in OBP (.362), and were 4th in the league in SLG (.460), finishing behind Seattle (.468), Boston (.463) &amp; Texas (.462).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155923</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155923</guid>
		<description>First of all, OPS is not the be all end all. It&#039;s sort of wearing me out how it gets slapped down on the table like a royal flush, point proved. 

Second, it just seems like all roads lead to A Rod in these arguments. No matter what is said, it somehow equals absolutely needing him on the team.

In a general sense, the 1998 team had no real power and still had a dominant offense. Their offense had little to do with slugging, but it was about as even a team as you could ask for. Teams with one or two big boppers tend to wait around a lot for someone to go yard. We saw the Yanks do it for years to stagnant effect. And we saw them thrive when slugger-less. Not that that&#039;s the only way to do it, but the idea that they need a player like A Rod, and especially A Rod the walking distraction himself, is without basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, OPS is not the be all end all. It&#8217;s sort of wearing me out how it gets slapped down on the table like a royal flush, point proved. </p>
<p>Second, it just seems like all roads lead to A Rod in these arguments. No matter what is said, it somehow equals absolutely needing him on the team.</p>
<p>In a general sense, the 1998 team had no real power and still had a dominant offense. Their offense had little to do with slugging, but it was about as even a team as you could ask for. Teams with one or two big boppers tend to wait around a lot for someone to go yard. We saw the Yanks do it for years to stagnant effect. And we saw them thrive when slugger-less. Not that that&#8217;s the only way to do it, but the idea that they need a player like A Rod, and especially A Rod the walking distraction himself, is without basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155922</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155922</guid>
		<description>[28] Exactly my point...the Yankees have usually had a great offense, not an opportunistic lineup of &quot;winners&quot;. If the Yankees want to have a dominant offense, they need Arod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[28] Exactly my point&#8230;the Yankees have usually had a great offense, not an opportunistic lineup of &#8220;winners&#8221;. If the Yankees want to have a dominant offense, they need Arod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Firstman</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155921</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Firstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155921</guid>
		<description>[24]

Year      Team Off. OPS+
2008	101
2007	118
2006	112
2005	115
2004	112
2003	115
2002	114
2001	100
2000	104
1999	110
1998	117</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[24]</p>
<p>Year      Team Off. OPS+<br />
2008	101<br />
2007	118<br />
2006	112<br />
2005	115<br />
2004	112<br />
2003	115<br />
2002	114<br />
2001	100<br />
2000	104<br />
1999	110<br />
1998	117</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelarmis</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155920</link>
		<dc:creator>thelarmis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155920</guid>
		<description>hmmm, the braves had a spring training game on tv here last thursday; i wonder if today&#039;s will be televised. i&#039;m guessing no...

pete abe: jeter - no comment on the a-rod comment. damon - funny comment about &quot;showing alex what i can do&quot;, (said w/ a laugh).

kudos to Diana for a KMFDM reference! i&#039;m down with the original meaning for the bands&#039; acronym, for certain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, the braves had a spring training game on tv here last thursday; i wonder if today&#8217;s will be televised. i&#8217;m guessing no&#8230;</p>
<p>pete abe: jeter &#8211; no comment on the a-rod comment. damon &#8211; funny comment about &#8220;showing alex what i can do&#8221;, (said w/ a laugh).</p>
<p>kudos to Diana for a KMFDM reference! i&#8217;m down with the original meaning for the bands&#8217; acronym, for certain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155919</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155919</guid>
		<description>[24] Thought we were talking about talent and scoring runs. If you think the 1998 team was made up of a bunch of A-Rods, so be it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[24] Thought we were talking about talent and scoring runs. If you think the 1998 team was made up of a bunch of A-Rods, so be it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichiganYankee</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155918</link>
		<dc:creator>MichiganYankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155918</guid>
		<description>I saw Sherman&#039;s blog entry on the contracts, and I too was stunned by $23,500 minor league figures.  I thought that CBA had a minor league minimum that was substantially higher than that.

Sherman writes that the Yankees have finished up contracts for the 40-man roster, yet I have not seen any contracts reported for Joba, Hughes, Edwar, Aceves, Veras, Coke, Giese, Sanchez or Claggett.  In fact, Sherman himself wrote on Feb. 20 that Joba remained unsigned and that the Yankees could renew his $390,000 contract (I presume that means adjusting to the new ML minimum of $400,000) between March 2 and 11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Sherman&#8217;s blog entry on the contracts, and I too was stunned by $23,500 minor league figures.  I thought that CBA had a minor league minimum that was substantially higher than that.</p>
<p>Sherman writes that the Yankees have finished up contracts for the 40-man roster, yet I have not seen any contracts reported for Joba, Hughes, Edwar, Aceves, Veras, Coke, Giese, Sanchez or Claggett.  In fact, Sherman himself wrote on Feb. 20 that Joba remained unsigned and that the Yankees could renew his $390,000 contract (I presume that means adjusting to the new ML minimum of $400,000) between March 2 and 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamnyy23</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155917</link>
		<dc:creator>williamnyy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155917</guid>
		<description>[23] Are you talking about the 1998 team? If so, they did have Bernie Williams put up an Arod-like 160 OPS+ as well as 5 other players post an OPS+ over 120. This current team can&#039;t approach that kind of production without Arod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[23] Are you talking about the 1998 team? If so, they did have Bernie Williams put up an Arod-like 160 OPS+ as well as 5 other players post an OPS+ over 120. This current team can&#8217;t approach that kind of production without Arod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155916</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155916</guid>
		<description>[16] You only have to score enough runs to win. The best team I&#039;ve ever seen had no-one like Rodriguez in terms of talent but always scored enough runs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[16] You only have to score enough runs to win. The best team I&#8217;ve ever seen had no-one like Rodriguez in terms of talent but always scored enough runs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankee Mama</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/03/04/news-of-the-day-3409/#comment-155915</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankee Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=8654#comment-155915</guid>
		<description>I agree about Pete Abe. I, too hope IPK does well, as I&#039;ve long forgiven him for his chunp postgame interview. Anyway, how can you not root for a Howdy Doody look-alike?

As for Alex, when he decided that he was going to play in the WBC for the Dominican team (and not team USA), I had a thought that something was going to come up in the last minute which would drive him away from the competition. I tend towards the cynical, but could it all have been staged?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about Pete Abe. I, too hope IPK does well, as I&#8217;ve long forgiven him for his chunp postgame interview. Anyway, how can you not root for a Howdy Doody look-alike?</p>
<p>As for Alex, when he decided that he was going to play in the WBC for the Dominican team (and not team USA), I had a thought that something was going to come up in the last minute which would drive him away from the competition. I tend towards the cynical, but could it all have been staged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
