<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re Missing A Great Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce68</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189395</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189395</guid>
		<description>Why do representatives of MLB (the umps) get to IGNORE the rules and only the teams get to suffer?  If rules are optional in one direction, they should be optional both ways.  My own choice for the rules of choice for us to ignore would be the Revenue Sharing and Luxury Tax rules.  That would surely get MLB&#039;s attention, unlike the distressingly one-sided umpiring of today.  

When I saw Mick or Yogi called out on close plays in the fifties I (from a Jr High Schooler&#039;s perspective) was convinced that we were being jobbed, but after umping little league games in the eighties and nineties (because few other parents knew the rules) I took a more balanced view of the whole question, and thought that the Boss&#039;s reactions to bad calls was not very evenhanded, with screwups being more or less even in terms of impacting us and the opposition.  Recently, however, I am feeling more and more put upon by the umpiring, with this years being the most unprofessional and the worst in memory.  I am not sure that my sample size is large enough for this to be a valid conclusion because I have missed blacked-out games, but I still feel jobbed again (after 50 years).

Do any others feel the same???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do representatives of MLB (the umps) get to IGNORE the rules and only the teams get to suffer?  If rules are optional in one direction, they should be optional both ways.  My own choice for the rules of choice for us to ignore would be the Revenue Sharing and Luxury Tax rules.  That would surely get MLB&#8217;s attention, unlike the distressingly one-sided umpiring of today.  </p>
<p>When I saw Mick or Yogi called out on close plays in the fifties I (from a Jr High Schooler&#8217;s perspective) was convinced that we were being jobbed, but after umping little league games in the eighties and nineties (because few other parents knew the rules) I took a more balanced view of the whole question, and thought that the Boss&#8217;s reactions to bad calls was not very evenhanded, with screwups being more or less even in terms of impacting us and the opposition.  Recently, however, I am feeling more and more put upon by the umpiring, with this years being the most unprofessional and the worst in memory.  I am not sure that my sample size is large enough for this to be a valid conclusion because I have missed blacked-out games, but I still feel jobbed again (after 50 years).</p>
<p>Do any others feel the same???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189394</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189394</guid>
		<description>[36] 

Aren&#039;t you blaming the whole umpiring system? And if the whole umpiring system is guilty, then isn&#039;t this an indictment of our baseball institutions in general? I put it to you, Horace - isn&#039;t this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want, but I&#039;m not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!

/Animal House

Would he at least publicly acknowledge the extent of his insubordination, voluntarily suspend himself, and vow never to do it again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[36] </p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t you blaming the whole umpiring system? And if the whole umpiring system is guilty, then isn&#8217;t this an indictment of our baseball institutions in general? I put it to you, Horace &#8211; isn&#8217;t this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want, but I&#8217;m not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!</p>
<p>/Animal House</p>
<p>Would he at least publicly acknowledge the extent of his insubordination, voluntarily suspend himself, and vow never to do it again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horace Clarke Era</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189393</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Clarke Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189393</guid>
		<description>Rich, [30], [31] and [12 + 32] all offer at least an alternative reading of what happened there. You certainly don&#039;t have to buy it, but we certainly don&#039;t have to all the way to agreeing with &#039;Foster lost his standing to be an umpire.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, [30], [31] and [12 + 32] all offer at least an alternative reading of what happened there. You certainly don&#8217;t have to buy it, but we certainly don&#8217;t have to all the way to agreeing with &#8216;Foster lost his standing to be an umpire.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seamus</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189392</link>
		<dc:creator>seamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189392</guid>
		<description>ack, the ump pissed me off but I didn&#039;t take it personally.  A bad day at the office or whatever.  Move on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ack, the ump pissed me off but I didn&#8217;t take it personally.  A bad day at the office or whatever.  Move on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189391</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189391</guid>
		<description>Umpires are teh suk!

Always have been, always will be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umpires are teh suk!</p>
<p>Always have been, always will be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189390</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189390</guid>
		<description>[30] &lt;b&gt;People say stupid things under stress, and umps blow calls. Pissed off as I am by two calls that truly altered that game, my sense is that Foster was essentially saying, ‘If the ball beats you and I don’t SEE clearly that you did some Housini escape, I’m going to call you out.’&lt;/b&gt;

To describe what Foster did as stupid is to rob the word of its commonly understood definition, which according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stupid&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dictionary.com&lt;/a&gt; is &quot;lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind; dull.&quot;  

That isn&#039;t what Foster did. To the contrary, Foster arrogated to himself the ability to make up his own rules because he lacked the integrity to follow those prescribed by MLB. 

If he had merely misinterpreted or misapplied the MLB rule, that could reasonably be called stupid. Ignoring the rule, however, is to defy established authority, which is insubordination.

It&#039;s as if a lower court judge ruled that the Equal Protection Clause or the First Amendment didn&#039;t exist, which would be an impeachable offense.

Foster has lost the standing to be an umpire. It&#039;s time to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[30] <b>People say stupid things under stress, and umps blow calls. Pissed off as I am by two calls that truly altered that game, my sense is that Foster was essentially saying, ‘If the ball beats you and I don’t SEE clearly that you did some Housini escape, I’m going to call you out.’</b></p>
<p>To describe what Foster did as stupid is to rob the word of its commonly understood definition, which according to <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stupid" rel="nofollow">dictionary.com</a> is &#8220;lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind; dull.&#8221;  </p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t what Foster did. To the contrary, Foster arrogated to himself the ability to make up his own rules because he lacked the integrity to follow those prescribed by MLB. </p>
<p>If he had merely misinterpreted or misapplied the MLB rule, that could reasonably be called stupid. Ignoring the rule, however, is to defy established authority, which is insubordination.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if a lower court judge ruled that the Equal Protection Clause or the First Amendment didn&#8217;t exist, which would be an impeachable offense.</p>
<p>Foster has lost the standing to be an umpire. It&#8217;s time to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189389</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189389</guid>
		<description>[30] Thank you.  A much better version of what I was trying to say back in [12].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[30] Thank you.  A much better version of what I was trying to say back in [12].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189388</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189388</guid>
		<description>[28] I would imagine it has something to do with the difference between actively (or willfully) doing something wrong and simply making an honest mistake. 

The question with Foster, though, is was this an honest mistake.  Which leads to...

[29] I think that a lot of people are misunderstanding what Foster (presumably) meant by what he (presumably) said. I don&#039;t think that he was &quot;flouting the rules&quot; or even a misunderstanding of the rules. Rather, it had long been one of those &quot;unwritten rules&#039; (see [14]), an unfortunate but all too common &quot;courtesy&quot; that when a throw beats the runner by a mile, he will be called out. It is exactly equivalent to the &quot;neighborhood call&quot; at second base (see [26]). 

Rance Mulliniks, the former player and now Jays announcer, basically said the same thing: (paraphrasing) &quot;When the throw beats you [the runner], you&#039;re usually not going to get that call.&quot; 

Hirschbeck said the same thing: &quot;...Nowadays, with the cameras, ESPN and the reporters, I say the media, I actually mean television — it used to be if the ball beat you, you were out, but it isn’t that way anymore. It’s not a reason to call someone out. You have to make a good tag.”

Now, this does not make what Foster did acceptable--it&#039;s not.  And indeed Hirschbeck&#039;s statement indicates that umps have moved away from this type of call (not because it was wrong. mind you, only because more cameras put them under greater scrutiny). But the reality is that Foster&#039;s bigger mistake made was in being too explicit in admitting that he called Jeter out because the throw beat him.  If he just went through the motions and said &quot;from my view he tagged you,&quot; everyone would have accepted it--even though most would have known deep down that the call was made because the throw arrived well before the runner, not because of the tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[28] I would imagine it has something to do with the difference between actively (or willfully) doing something wrong and simply making an honest mistake. </p>
<p>The question with Foster, though, is was this an honest mistake.  Which leads to&#8230;</p>
<p>[29] I think that a lot of people are misunderstanding what Foster (presumably) meant by what he (presumably) said. I don&#8217;t think that he was &#8220;flouting the rules&#8221; or even a misunderstanding of the rules. Rather, it had long been one of those &#8220;unwritten rules&#8217; (see [14]), an unfortunate but all too common &#8220;courtesy&#8221; that when a throw beats the runner by a mile, he will be called out. It is exactly equivalent to the &#8220;neighborhood call&#8221; at second base (see [26]). </p>
<p>Rance Mulliniks, the former player and now Jays announcer, basically said the same thing: (paraphrasing) &#8220;When the throw beats you [the runner], you&#8217;re usually not going to get that call.&#8221; </p>
<p>Hirschbeck said the same thing: &#8220;&#8230;Nowadays, with the cameras, ESPN and the reporters, I say the media, I actually mean television — it used to be if the ball beat you, you were out, but it isn’t that way anymore. It’s not a reason to call someone out. You have to make a good tag.”</p>
<p>Now, this does not make what Foster did acceptable&#8211;it&#8217;s not.  And indeed Hirschbeck&#8217;s statement indicates that umps have moved away from this type of call (not because it was wrong. mind you, only because more cameras put them under greater scrutiny). But the reality is that Foster&#8217;s bigger mistake made was in being too explicit in admitting that he called Jeter out because the throw beat him.  If he just went through the motions and said &#8220;from my view he tagged you,&#8221; everyone would have accepted it&#8211;even though most would have known deep down that the call was made because the throw arrived well before the runner, not because of the tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horace Clarke Era</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189387</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Clarke Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189387</guid>
		<description>People say stupid things under stress, and umps blow calls. Pissed off as I am by two calls that truly altered that game, my sense is that Foster was essentially saying, &#039;If the ball beats you and I don&#039;t SEE clearly that you did some Housini escape, I&#039;m going to call you out.&#039;

All umps DO do that. To do the show it-pull it away or any other slick move to beat a waiting tag, you need to have the ump actually see it clearly, and sometimes positioning doesn&#039;t allow that. Foster&#039;s point (if we care to give him any benefit of any doubt as a veteran ump) is that since he didn&#039;t see Jeter dodge the glove, he had to go with the ball arriving first, and Jeter knows that&#039;s what umps will do.

I am aware that this isn&#039;t how he SEEMS to have put it (he doesn&#039;t have to tag you) but since that is so entirely outside the rulebook, it really only makes sense to put this kind of spin on it. So he missed a call, just as Teixeira&#039;s slide to home earlier in the series was missed by an ump in the wrong position (too far up third base line ... hey, was it Foster?) and the ball arriving first ruled the day.

Every player knows he&#039;s taking a chance on his nifty evasion being missed.

The one at 2nd base was just flat-out bad.

[28] Bud, EVERYONE cares. We also mostly know it evens out, and calls will be blown. Sometimes (playoff games, any sport)m it is more painful than others. We all know examples. Jeter got a homer on one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People say stupid things under stress, and umps blow calls. Pissed off as I am by two calls that truly altered that game, my sense is that Foster was essentially saying, &#8216;If the ball beats you and I don&#8217;t SEE clearly that you did some Housini escape, I&#8217;m going to call you out.&#8217;</p>
<p>All umps DO do that. To do the show it-pull it away or any other slick move to beat a waiting tag, you need to have the ump actually see it clearly, and sometimes positioning doesn&#8217;t allow that. Foster&#8217;s point (if we care to give him any benefit of any doubt as a veteran ump) is that since he didn&#8217;t see Jeter dodge the glove, he had to go with the ball arriving first, and Jeter knows that&#8217;s what umps will do.</p>
<p>I am aware that this isn&#8217;t how he SEEMS to have put it (he doesn&#8217;t have to tag you) but since that is so entirely outside the rulebook, it really only makes sense to put this kind of spin on it. So he missed a call, just as Teixeira&#8217;s slide to home earlier in the series was missed by an ump in the wrong position (too far up third base line &#8230; hey, was it Foster?) and the ball arriving first ruled the day.</p>
<p>Every player knows he&#8217;s taking a chance on his nifty evasion being missed.</p>
<p>The one at 2nd base was just flat-out bad.</p>
<p>[28] Bud, EVERYONE cares. We also mostly know it evens out, and calls will be blown. Sometimes (playoff games, any sport)m it is more painful than others. We all know examples. Jeter got a homer on one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189386</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189386</guid>
		<description>[25]  &lt;b&gt;I wouldn’t want a guy losing his job for saying something incredibly stupid,&lt;/b&gt;

That&#039;s where I disagree. I don&#039;t think it was stupid, I think Foster&#039;s blatant attempt to flout the rules demonstrated such a lack of integrity that he no longer possesses the requisite authority to be a credible umpire. To make matters worse, he didn&#039;t have the guts to face the press after the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[25]  <b>I wouldn’t want a guy losing his job for saying something incredibly stupid,</b></p>
<p>That&#8217;s where I disagree. I don&#8217;t think it was stupid, I think Foster&#8217;s blatant attempt to flout the rules demonstrated such a lack of integrity that he no longer possesses the requisite authority to be a credible umpire. To make matters worse, he didn&#8217;t have the guts to face the press after the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Wisenheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189385</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Wisenheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189385</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I don&#039;t understand how it&#039;s a friggin national crisis that some players are on PED that may or may not actually help them at baseball, but umpires routinely screw up calls that alter the outcomes of games, and nobody seems to give a shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I don&#8217;t understand how it&#8217;s a friggin national crisis that some players are on PED that may or may not actually help them at baseball, but umpires routinely screw up calls that alter the outcomes of games, and nobody seems to give a shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189384</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189384</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Hinske would have been the goat anyway. He had a pretty good game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Hinske would have been the goat anyway. He had a pretty good game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbj</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189383</link>
		<dc:creator>rbj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189383</guid>
		<description>Anyone else catch John Kruk&#039;s rant on the Foster fiasco, right before the 10 pm edition of BBTN?  I was surprised that he only called it a &quot;bull&quot; call, and was restrained enough to leave off the final four letters.

[9] Yup.  I can accept blown calls.  I can accept neighborhood calls.  I can accept umpires getting obscure rules wrong -- at times.

But coming up with a horseshit explanation on a non-force play is completely &lt;i&gt;unacceptable&lt;/i&gt;

Now, with the pine-tar game as precedent, should this game be replayed from the bottom of the first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else catch John Kruk&#8217;s rant on the Foster fiasco, right before the 10 pm edition of BBTN?  I was surprised that he only called it a &#8220;bull&#8221; call, and was restrained enough to leave off the final four letters.</p>
<p>[9] Yup.  I can accept blown calls.  I can accept neighborhood calls.  I can accept umpires getting obscure rules wrong &#8212; at times.</p>
<p>But coming up with a horseshit explanation on a non-force play is completely <i>unacceptable</i></p>
<p>Now, with the pine-tar game as precedent, should this game be replayed from the bottom of the first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimelo</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189382</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189382</guid>
		<description>[24] I wouldn&#039;t want a guy losing his job for saying something incredibly stupid, when being questioned about his work, but I would like to see him suspended for at least 10 games for giving an explanation more egregious than the missed call itself.  Still, it was nice to see what Hirschbeck had to say about Jeter. 

It was still a great game to watch at work (via my slingbox).  Win or lose, I&#039;ll take watching a ballgame at work any day of the week --except on my day&#039;s off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[24] I wouldn&#8217;t want a guy losing his job for saying something incredibly stupid, when being questioned about his work, but I would like to see him suspended for at least 10 games for giving an explanation more egregious than the missed call itself.  Still, it was nice to see what Hirschbeck had to say about Jeter. </p>
<p>It was still a great game to watch at work (via my slingbox).  Win or lose, I&#8217;ll take watching a ballgame at work any day of the week &#8211;except on my day&#8217;s off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189381</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189381</guid>
		<description>There is no way that Foster should ever be permitted to umpire another ML game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way that Foster should ever be permitted to umpire another ML game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189380</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189380</guid>
		<description>[22] Awesome, thanks man. My sister is about your age and remembered the same as you! I was only 5 so I can&#039;t recall it..though Reggie was my first favorite player and it was never bedtime until he had his first AB! 

I&#039;m tempted to order an entire season of the Love Boat in dvd just to see it..

Boston, 2 hits against Oakland?? Well, Neyer says they are still probably the best team in baseball so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[22] Awesome, thanks man. My sister is about your age and remembered the same as you! I was only 5 so I can&#8217;t recall it..though Reggie was my first favorite player and it was never bedtime until he had his first AB! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted to order an entire season of the Love Boat in dvd just to see it..</p>
<p>Boston, 2 hits against Oakland?? Well, Neyer says they are still probably the best team in baseball so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Empire</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189379</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Empire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189379</guid>
		<description>[14] OK, I saw that episode when I was 12; the show aired in 1979. My recollection -- and it&#039;s a bit foggy -- was that he didn&#039;t want anyone to know that he was &quot;THE&quot; Reggie Jackson, but wanted a private trip, but by the end of the show his ego couldn&#039;t take it and he was even jogging around in his Yankees hat.  There may have also been a love interest, but I can&#039;t remember.  Here&#039;s the IMDB on the episode but unfortunately there&#039;s no plot summary

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0636667/

I half-listened to the game at work and missed all the blown calls.  I&#039;m just glad Boston lost.  If we can go 4-2 or even 3-3 over the next 6 games we can keep it to 3 games out at the end of the first half, which after going 0-8 against them wouldn&#039;t be too bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[14] OK, I saw that episode when I was 12; the show aired in 1979. My recollection &#8212; and it&#8217;s a bit foggy &#8212; was that he didn&#8217;t want anyone to know that he was &#8220;THE&#8221; Reggie Jackson, but wanted a private trip, but by the end of the show his ego couldn&#8217;t take it and he was even jogging around in his Yankees hat.  There may have also been a love interest, but I can&#8217;t remember.  Here&#8217;s the IMDB on the episode but unfortunately there&#8217;s no plot summary</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0636667/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0636667/</a></p>
<p>I half-listened to the game at work and missed all the blown calls.  I&#8217;m just glad Boston lost.  If we can go 4-2 or even 3-3 over the next 6 games we can keep it to 3 games out at the end of the first half, which after going 0-8 against them wouldn&#8217;t be too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189378</guid>
		<description>[17] Nice, man! 
I got Eddie Henderson on the iPod today..spacey,70s art-funk. 

Any ideas about Reggie &amp; The Love Boat? I am obsessed with seeing that episode!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[17] Nice, man!<br />
I got Eddie Henderson on the iPod today..spacey,70s art-funk. </p>
<p>Any ideas about Reggie &amp; The Love Boat? I am obsessed with seeing that episode!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIYank</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189377</link>
		<dc:creator>RIYank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189377</guid>
		<description>[18] Maybe.
I think if he says it to an ordinary mortal, Foster gets away with it, with a kind of nudge-nudge-wink-wink. But in saying it, whatever it was, to Jeter, he just bit off more than he could chew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[18] Maybe.<br />
I think if he says it to an ordinary mortal, Foster gets away with it, with a kind of nudge-nudge-wink-wink. But in saying it, whatever it was, to Jeter, he just bit off more than he could chew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/07/06/youre-missing-a-great-game/#comment-189376</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=21329#comment-189376</guid>
		<description>Jeter was asked, point blank (again paraphrasing) &quot;did he actually say &#039;he doesn&#039;t need to tag you?&#039;&quot; Jeter replied affirmatively. If Jeter&#039;s misrepresenting, he&#039;s doing it actively and knowingly. I don&#039;t buy that, particularly since Girardi had the same reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeter was asked, point blank (again paraphrasing) &#8220;did he actually say &#8216;he doesn&#8217;t need to tag you?&#8217;&#8221; Jeter replied affirmatively. If Jeter&#8217;s misrepresenting, he&#8217;s doing it actively and knowingly. I don&#8217;t buy that, particularly since Girardi had the same reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

