<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game On!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 51cq24</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226612</link>
		<dc:creator>51cq24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226612</guid>
		<description>[819] the problem is you&#039;re only talking about the last of those starts, when he gave up 5 runs in 3.2 innings against the phillies in the division series.  the previous 3 starts were also made on short rest, and he only gave up 2 earned runs 21.2 innings, including a shutout against the cubs (his 3rd consecutive start on short rest).  in those 3 starts he had a 0.83 era, a 0.88 whip, and 5.25 k/bb.  he pitched 253 innings (256.2 total) last year and 230 (now 244.2) this year.  i don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to compare one start on short rest after a full season of regular rest or longer to his 4th straight start on short rest last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[819] the problem is you&#8217;re only talking about the last of those starts, when he gave up 5 runs in 3.2 innings against the phillies in the division series.  the previous 3 starts were also made on short rest, and he only gave up 2 earned runs 21.2 innings, including a shutout against the cubs (his 3rd consecutive start on short rest).  in those 3 starts he had a 0.83 era, a 0.88 whip, and 5.25 k/bb.  he pitched 253 innings (256.2 total) last year and 230 (now 244.2) this year.  i don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to compare one start on short rest after a full season of regular rest or longer to his 4th straight start on short rest last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankster</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226611</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226611</guid>
		<description>Of course 113 is no big deal for CC, when he&#039;s pitching on regular rest. 123 is no big deal on regular rest. But even CC seems (looking at last year) to be less effective on short rest after pitching a lot.

Also, of course keeping CC in would have been the best strategy for winning this game had it been close, and I agree that no harm was done to him with his pitch count this game.

What I&#039;m saying is that maybe it&#039;s a good idea to cap CC at 200 pitches in any four days if you don&#039;t want to slow him down. Certainly he has a track record of throwing poorly in the past after throwing 220 pitches in a four day period.

Certainly there&#039;s a very strong track record that a lot of pitchers throw poorly when their workload gets to 200 pitches in a four day period - that&#039;s why it&#039;s called short rest and why it&#039;s rarely done. CC has shown the same pattern in the past, but maybe he&#039;s become grittier since last year - who knows?

It&#039;s not his arm I&#039;m worried about, by the way, it&#039;s winning his next start.

Anyway. Clearly I&#039;m in the minority here, which means, hopefully, that I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course 113 is no big deal for CC, when he&#8217;s pitching on regular rest. 123 is no big deal on regular rest. But even CC seems (looking at last year) to be less effective on short rest after pitching a lot.</p>
<p>Also, of course keeping CC in would have been the best strategy for winning this game had it been close, and I agree that no harm was done to him with his pitch count this game.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m saying is that maybe it&#8217;s a good idea to cap CC at 200 pitches in any four days if you don&#8217;t want to slow him down. Certainly he has a track record of throwing poorly in the past after throwing 220 pitches in a four day period.</p>
<p>Certainly there&#8217;s a very strong track record that a lot of pitchers throw poorly when their workload gets to 200 pitches in a four day period &#8211; that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s called short rest and why it&#8217;s rarely done. CC has shown the same pattern in the past, but maybe he&#8217;s become grittier since last year &#8211; who knows?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not his arm I&#8217;m worried about, by the way, it&#8217;s winning his next start.</p>
<p>Anyway. Clearly I&#8217;m in the minority here, which means, hopefully, that I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226610</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226610</guid>
		<description>[817] potential top-10 player drinking buddy, alongside Oil Can Boyd and David Wells. 

bottom-10 would have to start with Billy Martin..small, wiry guys who drink too much are always looking to fight..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[817] potential top-10 player drinking buddy, alongside Oil Can Boyd and David Wells. </p>
<p>bottom-10 would have to start with Billy Martin..small, wiry guys who drink too much are always looking to fight..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 51cq24</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226609</link>
		<dc:creator>51cq24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226609</guid>
		<description>[816] cone is the best.  what a character.  and he actually knows what he&#039;s talking about, he doesn&#039;t just say what everyone else says (like he actually pointed out that since abreu signed, only one angel, figgins, has actually walked more than he had last year)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[816] cone is the best.  what a character.  and he actually knows what he&#8217;s talking about, he doesn&#8217;t just say what everyone else says (like he actually pointed out that since abreu signed, only one angel, figgins, has actually walked more than he had last year)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYYfan22</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226608</link>
		<dc:creator>NYYfan22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226608</guid>
		<description>watching the postgame on Yes.  Are these guys on speed?  Talking fast as hell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watching the postgame on Yes.  Are these guys on speed?  Talking fast as hell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeremyM</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226607</link>
		<dc:creator>JeremyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226607</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hammer Saunders tomorrow and hope good AJ shows up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hammer Saunders tomorrow and hope good AJ shows up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226606</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226606</guid>
		<description>[812] Oh I know..I meant that, 113 for CC is really not a huge deal..it&#039;s 140+ when you&#039;re asking for trouble..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[812] Oh I know..I meant that, 113 for CC is really not a huge deal..it&#8217;s 140+ when you&#8217;re asking for trouble..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226605</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226605</guid>
		<description>Studies show that the RPS (Rest Pitches Stored) is based on size, and is: PS% = (6 * Waist size) / rest days / pi..
In CC&#039;s case, this is about 9%, so CC saved about 10 pitches due to rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studies show that the RPS (Rest Pitches Stored) is based on size, and is: PS% = (6 * Waist size) / rest days / pi..<br />
In CC&#8217;s case, this is about 9%, so CC saved about 10 pitches due to rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226604</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226604</guid>
		<description>[809] &lt;i&gt;remember when David Cone threw 156 pithces?!?!&lt;/i&gt;

Yes.  And I remember the outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[809] <i>remember when David Cone threw 156 pithces?!?!</i></p>
<p>Yes.  And I remember the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Fair</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226603</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Fair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226603</guid>
		<description>That Snoop-Choad fuck-up will always be one of my favorites.  Kinda like a security blanket.  Douches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Snoop-Choad fuck-up will always be one of my favorites.  Kinda like a security blanket.  Douches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeping for brunnhilde</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226602</link>
		<dc:creator>weeping for brunnhilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226602</guid>
		<description>Hideki&#039;s hit was huge.  That set the tone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hideki&#8217;s hit was huge.  That set the tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. OK Jazz TOKYO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226601</guid>
		<description>[806] Oh, well-done sirrah! 

CC can handle 113, I don&#039;t see the big deal. 140 is pushing it..(remember when David Cone threw 156 pithces?!?!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[806] Oh, well-done sirrah! </p>
<p>CC can handle 113, I don&#8217;t see the big deal. 140 is pushing it..(remember when David Cone threw 156 pithces?!?!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226600</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226600</guid>
		<description>[807] I agree again...that&#039;s why I kept hoping for a tack-on run or three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[807] I agree again&#8230;that&#8217;s why I kept hoping for a tack-on run or three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 51cq24</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226599</link>
		<dc:creator>51cq24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226599</guid>
		<description>[805] well i think it was borderline on whether they were in a position to do so.  the way he was pitching, i think he was definitely the best bet for the 8th inning.  and while you can&#039;t really store up on extra pitches, surely it makes a difference that he&#039;s had so much rest lately.  anyway, my main point is that one extra inning isn&#039;t going to make a difference in this context.  if he had been worked a lot lately, that would be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[805] well i think it was borderline on whether they were in a position to do so.  the way he was pitching, i think he was definitely the best bet for the 8th inning.  and while you can&#8217;t really store up on extra pitches, surely it makes a difference that he&#8217;s had so much rest lately.  anyway, my main point is that one extra inning isn&#8217;t going to make a difference in this context.  if he had been worked a lot lately, that would be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Fair</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226598</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Fair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226598</guid>
		<description>Big Fella&#039;s going to sleep well tonight.    Johan Santana may toss and turn a little...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Fella&#8217;s going to sleep well tonight.    Johan Santana may toss and turn a little&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226597</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226597</guid>
		<description>[801] I agree with you...but I&#039;m not sure that having the long layoff really matters. I&#039;m pretty sure that pitchers can&#039;t &quot;store up&quot; extra pitches (I haven&#039;t thrown in a week coach, so I&#039;m good for 150 pitches tonight).  Ultimately, I don&#039;t think ~115 pitches is all that much for CC, but at the same time, if he is going on short rest AND if the team was in a position to do so, surely it couldn&#039;t have hurt not to press him tonight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[801] I agree with you&#8230;but I&#8217;m not sure that having the long layoff really matters. I&#8217;m pretty sure that pitchers can&#8217;t &#8220;store up&#8221; extra pitches (I haven&#8217;t thrown in a week coach, so I&#8217;m good for 150 pitches tonight).  Ultimately, I don&#8217;t think ~115 pitches is all that much for CC, but at the same time, if he is going on short rest AND if the team was in a position to do so, surely it couldn&#8217;t have hurt not to press him tonight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldYanksFan</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226596</link>
		<dc:creator>OldYanksFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226596</guid>
		<description>I WON MY SPADES GAME!!!!
What happened with the Yankees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WON MY SPADES GAME!!!!<br />
What happened with the Yankees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeping for brunnhilde</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226595</link>
		<dc:creator>weeping for brunnhilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226595</guid>
		<description>Guys, I love you, I love your passion, but for God&#039;s sake, let&#039;s bask for a couple minutes, anyway!

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, I love you, I love your passion, but for God&#8217;s sake, let&#8217;s bask for a couple minutes, anyway!<br />
 <img src='http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeypants</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226594</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeypants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226594</guid>
		<description>[794] I love November baseball!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[794] I love November baseball!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 51cq24</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/10/16/game-on-2/#comment-226593</link>
		<dc:creator>51cq24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25139#comment-226593</guid>
		<description>[799] right, so don&#039;t you see a difference between that and starting on short rest once after an 8 inning performance following a week+ off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[799] right, so don&#8217;t you see a difference between that and starting on short rest once after an 8 inning performance following a week+ off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
