<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sticking To The Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/</link>
	<description>Development site for Bronx Banter Blog&#039;s upcoming look and feel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sliced Bread</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240748</link>
		<dc:creator>Sliced Bread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240748</guid>
		<description>[25] good call, Chyll.  The umps and everyone else who needed to know knew the cameras could come into play, and planned to keep an eye on it. 
Neyer didn&#039;t get the memo and apparently feels left out.  
Anyway, no question  in my eyes that ball would have gone out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[25] good call, Chyll.  The umps and everyone else who needed to know knew the cameras could come into play, and planned to keep an eye on it.<br />
Neyer didn&#8217;t get the memo and apparently feels left out.<br />
Anyway, no question  in my eyes that ball would have gone out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sliced Bread</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240747</link>
		<dc:creator>Sliced Bread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240747</guid>
		<description>being a primarily American League dad I haven&#039;t had too many opportunities to explain the DH rule to my youngs sons.  I&#039;ve explained it to them, but they still question me when they see our pitchers hit in interleague games.  They laughed outloud at how slowly Pettitte runs (they&#039;re all about speed which is why they ALWAYS ask me if Garnder is playing, and if not they beg, WHY?)   Pettitte&#039;s jacket was the last straw.  Why any athlete would subject themselves to such &quot;babying&quot; is beyond the grasp of my macho elementary school ballers, who need no excuse to underdress for the weather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>being a primarily American League dad I haven&#8217;t had too many opportunities to explain the DH rule to my youngs sons.  I&#8217;ve explained it to them, but they still question me when they see our pitchers hit in interleague games.  They laughed outloud at how slowly Pettitte runs (they&#8217;re all about speed which is why they ALWAYS ask me if Garnder is playing, and if not they beg, WHY?)   Pettitte&#8217;s jacket was the last straw.  Why any athlete would subject themselves to such &#8220;babying&#8221; is beyond the grasp of my macho elementary school ballers, who need no excuse to underdress for the weather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sliced Bread</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240746</link>
		<dc:creator>Sliced Bread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240746</guid>
		<description>sorry for the breathless fan boy rant, but this team has me giddy for lack of a less silly word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the breathless fan boy rant, but this team has me giddy for lack of a less silly word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sliced Bread</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240745</link>
		<dc:creator>Sliced Bread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240745</guid>
		<description>excellent recap, Cliff.  
Couldn&#039;t be more proud of Pettitte today.  He grinds one out in the Philly bandbox, strokes a World Series ribbie, and scores! in a 3 run victory.  Awesome performance. Stand up and yell Bravo! to the man.  
Loved the shot of him and Posada talking strategy in the dugout,  Jeter&#039;s comment to the ump about having to hear Pettitte boast about his big hit.  
Great stuff.  Another World Series classic by Andy.

Also, agree with Cliff that I would have stuck with Big Shoes Hughes until another Philly reached based.  Hopefully he understands it&#039;s nothing personal going to Mo in that situation.  It&#039;s business.  I&#039;m confident he has the confidence to bounce back.  Mo will talk to him about that.  
Is Hughes gassed?  I dunno.  I suspect not.  Big strong kid like that, who&#039;s had plenty of rest -- I think he&#039;s just making mistakes and good hitters are making him pay for them.  Growing pains.  Fortunately, we have baseball&#039;s greatest insurance plan backing him up.

Lotta baseball to go, and how fortunate are we to get a Sabathia start on a Sunday night in November.  Our baseball blessings abound.

Oh, and ARod has been a joy to behold.   Couldn&#039;t be more proud of him.  I&#039;m almost overcome with pride watching him carry the team this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent recap, Cliff.<br />
Couldn&#8217;t be more proud of Pettitte today.  He grinds one out in the Philly bandbox, strokes a World Series ribbie, and scores! in a 3 run victory.  Awesome performance. Stand up and yell Bravo! to the man.<br />
Loved the shot of him and Posada talking strategy in the dugout,  Jeter&#8217;s comment to the ump about having to hear Pettitte boast about his big hit.<br />
Great stuff.  Another World Series classic by Andy.</p>
<p>Also, agree with Cliff that I would have stuck with Big Shoes Hughes until another Philly reached based.  Hopefully he understands it&#8217;s nothing personal going to Mo in that situation.  It&#8217;s business.  I&#8217;m confident he has the confidence to bounce back.  Mo will talk to him about that.<br />
Is Hughes gassed?  I dunno.  I suspect not.  Big strong kid like that, who&#8217;s had plenty of rest &#8212; I think he&#8217;s just making mistakes and good hitters are making him pay for them.  Growing pains.  Fortunately, we have baseball&#8217;s greatest insurance plan backing him up.</p>
<p>Lotta baseball to go, and how fortunate are we to get a Sabathia start on a Sunday night in November.  Our baseball blessings abound.</p>
<p>Oh, and ARod has been a joy to behold.   Couldn&#8217;t be more proud of him.  I&#8217;m almost overcome with pride watching him carry the team this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seamus</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240744</link>
		<dc:creator>seamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240744</guid>
		<description>[32] you can worry about his confidence in the off season.  Right now, we need to win the world serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[32] you can worry about his confidence in the off season.  Right now, we need to win the world serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeping for brunnhilde</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240743</link>
		<dc:creator>weeping for brunnhilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240743</guid>
		<description>[23] Also, I don&#039;t think Hughes&#039; confidence should factor in at all, right now, especially since Joba and Marte have stepped up in a huge way.  

We only have to win two more games and we have CC for two of them, so we&#039;re not absolutely dependent on what Phil can give us from here on out.  We can afford to not have to rely on him from here on out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[23] Also, I don&#8217;t think Hughes&#8217; confidence should factor in at all, right now, especially since Joba and Marte have stepped up in a huge way.  </p>
<p>We only have to win two more games and we have CC for two of them, so we&#8217;re not absolutely dependent on what Phil can give us from here on out.  We can afford to not have to rely on him from here on out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeping for brunnhilde</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240742</link>
		<dc:creator>weeping for brunnhilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240742</guid>
		<description>[30]  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[30]  <img src='http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240741</guid>
		<description>[29] ¡Dios Mio! ¡Que lastima! Still, I don&#039;t think it will effect the tithes and burnt offerings today... &gt;;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[29] ¡Dios Mio! ¡Que lastima! Still, I don&#8217;t think it will effect the tithes and burnt offerings today&#8230; &gt;;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeping for brunnhilde</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240740</link>
		<dc:creator>weeping for brunnhilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240740</guid>
		<description>2009 postseason Mo has 4 walks in 13 1/3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 postseason Mo has 4 walks in 13 1/3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeping for brunnhilde</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240739</link>
		<dc:creator>weeping for brunnhilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240739</guid>
		<description>[26] Especially seeing as how Mo has not been sharp of late.  What Stairs got on and Mo came in and walked Rollins?  Or yes, Rollins bloops one in?  Mo has been a tad below lights out, so I don&#039;t want him in with little margin for error if it can be avoided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[26] Especially seeing as how Mo has not been sharp of late.  What Stairs got on and Mo came in and walked Rollins?  Or yes, Rollins bloops one in?  Mo has been a tad below lights out, so I don&#8217;t want him in with little margin for error if it can be avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeping for brunnhilde</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240738</link>
		<dc:creator>weeping for brunnhilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240738</guid>
		<description>[26] Agreed, 100%.

 I&#039;m glad Girardi didn&#039;t play games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[26] Agreed, 100%.</p>
<p> I&#8217;m glad Girardi didn&#8217;t play games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240737</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240737</guid>
		<description>[23] My only worry with that plan is the specter of Utley.  If Hughes puts Stairs on, then it&#039;s Rollins, Victorino, and Utley with one on and one out -- which means Mo is a broken-bat single away from facing Utley as the tying run.  I&#039;m happy Girardi played it safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[23] My only worry with that plan is the specter of Utley.  If Hughes puts Stairs on, then it&#8217;s Rollins, Victorino, and Utley with one on and one out &#8212; which means Mo is a broken-bat single away from facing Utley as the tying run.  I&#8217;m happy Girardi played it safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chyll Will</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240736</link>
		<dc:creator>Chyll Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240736</guid>
		<description>From Rob Neyer@ E@#$.com:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Blown Call:&lt;/b&gt; Well, maybe. Rodriguez&#039;s long fly in the fourth inning certainly did hit a television camera, and that camera certainly was above the right-field fence. But if the baseball hadn&#039;t hit the camera, would it really have cleared the fence? Perhaps. But it might also have hit the very top of the fence and bounced back into play, presumably limiting Rodriguez to a double. But upon review, the umpires awarded A-Rod a two-run home run. 

...&lt;b&gt;Update:&lt;/b&gt; According to this the umpires decided before the game that a batted ball hitting the camera above the right-field fence would automatically be a home run. Funny, I didn&#039;t know that umpires have the power to establish their own ground rules. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I love that some writers can never admit they were wrong; instead opting to pass the buck onto the object of their conjecture, but I decided to respond more to a simple, but surely wide-shared question about the FOX camera&#039;s positioning and subsequent role in the &quot;controversy&quot;... fortunately, I&#039;m not an E@#$.com member, so I&#039;ll post my intended comment here on the off-chance that it reaches the masses there...  

&lt;i&gt;&quot;As someone who works with cameras, I can tell you without a doubt that the difference between the camera hanging over the wall and being set back several feet behind is certainly noticeable by itself; depth of field, which is the measure of length of subject from the lens and determining what&#039;s in focus in between would be affected depending on what type of shot you are trying to achieve.  That this is shot multi-camera somewhat diminishes the visual impact of that one angle, but because it became the focus of a larger issue, it&#039;s positioning gained more attention than it perhaps deserved.

It&#039;s really a matter of style; FOX was going for intensive coverage and ended up in the middle of the game.  That&#039;s not unusual in broadcast  &quot;journalism&quot;, but obviously has the potential to adversely effect the event it covers.  The situation here was unlikely to occur, but it did and you have to give credit to the umpires at least for deciding beforehand what to do in case it actually did happen.  

A true knee-jerk reaction would be to automatically ban cameras from hanging over like that before considering the likelihood of batted balls hitting that exact spot multiple times.  In any regard, I doubt the umpires would have the power to move the cameras back; considering the partnership the network has with MLB in any regard.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Rob Neyer@ E@#$.com:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Blown Call:</b> Well, maybe. Rodriguez&#8217;s long fly in the fourth inning certainly did hit a television camera, and that camera certainly was above the right-field fence. But if the baseball hadn&#8217;t hit the camera, would it really have cleared the fence? Perhaps. But it might also have hit the very top of the fence and bounced back into play, presumably limiting Rodriguez to a double. But upon review, the umpires awarded A-Rod a two-run home run. </p>
<p>&#8230;<b>Update:</b> According to this the umpires decided before the game that a batted ball hitting the camera above the right-field fence would automatically be a home run. Funny, I didn&#8217;t know that umpires have the power to establish their own ground rules. </p></blockquote>
<p>I love that some writers can never admit they were wrong; instead opting to pass the buck onto the object of their conjecture, but I decided to respond more to a simple, but surely wide-shared question about the FOX camera&#8217;s positioning and subsequent role in the &#8220;controversy&#8221;&#8230; fortunately, I&#8217;m not an E@#$.com member, so I&#8217;ll post my intended comment here on the off-chance that it reaches the masses there&#8230;  </p>
<p><i>&#8220;As someone who works with cameras, I can tell you without a doubt that the difference between the camera hanging over the wall and being set back several feet behind is certainly noticeable by itself; depth of field, which is the measure of length of subject from the lens and determining what&#8217;s in focus in between would be affected depending on what type of shot you are trying to achieve.  That this is shot multi-camera somewhat diminishes the visual impact of that one angle, but because it became the focus of a larger issue, it&#8217;s positioning gained more attention than it perhaps deserved.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really a matter of style; FOX was going for intensive coverage and ended up in the middle of the game.  That&#8217;s not unusual in broadcast  &#8220;journalism&#8221;, but obviously has the potential to adversely effect the event it covers.  The situation here was unlikely to occur, but it did and you have to give credit to the umpires at least for deciding beforehand what to do in case it actually did happen.  </p>
<p>A true knee-jerk reaction would be to automatically ban cameras from hanging over like that before considering the likelihood of batted balls hitting that exact spot multiple times.  In any regard, I doubt the umpires would have the power to move the cameras back; considering the partnership the network has with MLB in any regard.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horace Clarke Era</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240735</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Clarke Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240735</guid>
		<description>Morning after, and ... that was fun. I watched from another hotel bar on the road and this time had Yankee fans (and one good-natured Philly Phan) around me. My early worry was that Andyt was being very uncharacteristic - beating himself, walking bottom feeder batters. It does feel like A Rod&#039;s camera hogging homer (!) was the turning point, but Hamels looked iffy enough that they could have got him anyhow,. Still, being on 3-2 probably added to that shakiness. Major blow/return to a great post-season (um, remember to field though, Alex).

I agree that it really looks as if Hughes may just be gassed. I am never sure what &#039;tired arm&#039; means and it seems to mean different things to different pitching coaches, but I&#039;d say Hughes is tired. I&#039;m also it hat tip mode to Marte, who may have his mojo back just in time to pick up that slack. We might see him against righties again tonight/tomorrow. And while the hat is tipping, Joe G gets one, too, I think. I hope the Banter did that last night. (Though love the &#039;Mo for 5 innings&#039; line William!)

CC for 3-1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morning after, and &#8230; that was fun. I watched from another hotel bar on the road and this time had Yankee fans (and one good-natured Philly Phan) around me. My early worry was that Andyt was being very uncharacteristic &#8211; beating himself, walking bottom feeder batters. It does feel like A Rod&#8217;s camera hogging homer (!) was the turning point, but Hamels looked iffy enough that they could have got him anyhow,. Still, being on 3-2 probably added to that shakiness. Major blow/return to a great post-season (um, remember to field though, Alex).</p>
<p>I agree that it really looks as if Hughes may just be gassed. I am never sure what &#8216;tired arm&#8217; means and it seems to mean different things to different pitching coaches, but I&#8217;d say Hughes is tired. I&#8217;m also it hat tip mode to Marte, who may have his mojo back just in time to pick up that slack. We might see him against righties again tonight/tomorrow. And while the hat is tipping, Joe G gets one, too, I think. I hope the Banter did that last night. (Though love the &#8216;Mo for 5 innings&#8217; line William!)</p>
<p>CC for 3-1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240734</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240734</guid>
		<description>[21] I&#039;d have given Hughes one more batter with a three-run lead and two outs left in the game, but pulled him if one more man got on. I don&#039;t think pulling Hughes after a homer is going to help his confidence going forward, but then there are at most four games left in the season, so maybe such concerns are moot at this late date.

For what it&#039;s worth, as @leokitty has pointed out on twitter, Hughes may just be gassed. He&#039;s not been healthy for a full season since 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[21] I&#8217;d have given Hughes one more batter with a three-run lead and two outs left in the game, but pulled him if one more man got on. I don&#8217;t think pulling Hughes after a homer is going to help his confidence going forward, but then there are at most four games left in the season, so maybe such concerns are moot at this late date.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, as @leokitty has pointed out on twitter, Hughes may just be gassed. He&#8217;s not been healthy for a full season since 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Corcoran</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240733</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Corcoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240733</guid>
		<description>[17] Good explanation. FOX only showed the replay once and I didn&#039;t bother to rewind my DVR to check it again. I concede the point having not rewatched it.

As for [16], I&#039;m not sure how much detail the umpires usually go into on ground rules before each game. Manuel probably should have known because he&#039;s managed hundreds of games in this ballpark. Girardi would only have known from a pre-game briefing, but just because the managers aren&#039;t apprised of a certain ground rule doesn&#039;t make the rule invalid, and it didn&#039;t effect the way the players reacted to the play on the field. They played it like a double and the ruling was home run. No harm done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[17] Good explanation. FOX only showed the replay once and I didn&#8217;t bother to rewind my DVR to check it again. I concede the point having not rewatched it.</p>
<p>As for [16], I&#8217;m not sure how much detail the umpires usually go into on ground rules before each game. Manuel probably should have known because he&#8217;s managed hundreds of games in this ballpark. Girardi would only have known from a pre-game briefing, but just because the managers aren&#8217;t apprised of a certain ground rule doesn&#8217;t make the rule invalid, and it didn&#8217;t effect the way the players reacted to the play on the field. They played it like a double and the ruling was home run. No harm done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 51cq24</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240732</link>
		<dc:creator>51cq24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240732</guid>
		<description>[14] damon looked safe to me, but it was definitely close, and i was surprised no one said anything about it.  i was also surprised at how little attention they paid to the humongous strike zone the phillies were getting.  they were getting some strike calls on balls a foot outside to lefties and some that were way high against anyone.  it didn&#039;t look like the yankees were getting as many of those calls, but they might not have it that corner as much.  the umpire was definitely giving the outside corner to lefties more than the outside corner to righties, for both teams.

[20] it sucks that he gave up the hr because it would be great to have let him finish the game, and i think it was the right call to go straight to mo (if i were a phillies fan, i&#039;d be hoping that phil stays in longer there), but at least he was throwing strikes.  he looked ok to me, i just hope he isn&#039;t rattled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[14] damon looked safe to me, but it was definitely close, and i was surprised no one said anything about it.  i was also surprised at how little attention they paid to the humongous strike zone the phillies were getting.  they were getting some strike calls on balls a foot outside to lefties and some that were way high against anyone.  it didn&#8217;t look like the yankees were getting as many of those calls, but they might not have it that corner as much.  the umpire was definitely giving the outside corner to lefties more than the outside corner to righties, for both teams.</p>
<p>[20] it sucks that he gave up the hr because it would be great to have let him finish the game, and i think it was the right call to go straight to mo (if i were a phillies fan, i&#8217;d be hoping that phil stays in longer there), but at least he was throwing strikes.  he looked ok to me, i just hope he isn&#8217;t rattled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Empire</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240731</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Empire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240731</guid>
		<description>By the way, I am bummed about Hughes, but what&#039;s nice is that the arms in the pen seem fungible....Phil falters, so Joba and Marte step to the forefront....they fail and here come Coke and Robertson.  The Yanks deeper pen is making a difference and the difference will continue to be felt throughout the rest of the series.

AND, I&#039;m not so sure that Phil can&#039;t right the ship anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I am bummed about Hughes, but what&#8217;s nice is that the arms in the pen seem fungible&#8230;.Phil falters, so Joba and Marte step to the forefront&#8230;.they fail and here come Coke and Robertson.  The Yanks deeper pen is making a difference and the difference will continue to be felt throughout the rest of the series.</p>
<p>AND, I&#8217;m not so sure that Phil can&#8217;t right the ship anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Empire</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240730</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Empire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240730</guid>
		<description>I hope I can finally enjoy a game tonight without being like a white knuckle driver....I think we&#039;d have to be up 3-1 to finally relax and enjoy these games more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I can finally enjoy a game tonight without being like a white knuckle driver&#8230;.I think we&#8217;d have to be up 3-1 to finally relax and enjoy these games more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seamus</title>
		<link>http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2009/11/01/sticking-to-the-plan/#comment-240729</link>
		<dc:creator>seamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=25808#comment-240729</guid>
		<description>[17] I should note I just re-watched it to be sure I had that right.  So I&#039;m fairly confident in my analysis of that play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[17] I should note I just re-watched it to be sure I had that right.  So I&#8217;m fairly confident in my analysis of that play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
