One of my favorite places at the Met:
One of my favorite places at the Met:
The Mets called up Ike Davis this afternoon. This may be the first time a New York baseball player has shared the same name with a Woody Allen character.
Rounding out the starting nine of the A.S. Konigsberg All Stars:
c: Boris Grushenko
2b: Virgil Starkwell
ss: Allan Felix
3b: Sandy Bates
lf : Alvy Singer
cf: Miles Monroe
rf: Mickey Sachs
bench: Leonard Zelig
p: Fielding Mellish
rp: Howard Prince
manager: Broadway Danny Rose
A real head-nodder…
I had dinner with a friend last week and asked him, “What’s your favorite vegetable?
“Asparagus,” he said without flinching.
“Really? You don’t mind that it makes your pee smell funny?”
“No, I love that, man.”
Go figure.
For the longest, I didn’t dare try asparagus and funny-smelling pee was the least of it. But I’ve learned to like asparagus in spite of that peculiar side effect. So I was eager to try a slow-cooking method that I saw in the Times last week.
I made it last night and it was tasty. Props to Melissa Clark for the article.
[Photo credit: Andrew Scrivani for The New York Times]
I haven’t seen the big Henri-Cartier Bresson show at the Modern yet but I did catch this review in The New Yorker:
Cartier-Bresson has the weakness of his strength: an Apollonian elevation that subjugates life to an order of things already known, if never so well seen. He said that the essence of his art was “the simultaneous recognition, in a fraction of a second, of the significance of an event, as well as the precise organization of forms which give that event its proper expression.” Too often, the “significance” feels platitudinous, even as its expression dazzles. Robert Frank, whose book “The Americans” (1958) treated subjects akin to many in the older photographer’s work, put it harshly but justly: “He traveled all over the goddamned world, and you never felt that he was moved by something that was happening other than the beauty of it, or just the composition.” The problem of Cartier-Bresson’s art is the conjunction of aesthetic classicism and journalistic protocol: timeless truth and breaking news. He rendered a world that, set forth at MOMA by the museum’s chief curator of photography, Peter Galassi, richly satisfies the eye and the mind, while numbing the heart.
…The hallmark of Cartier-Bresson’s genius is less in what he photographed than in where he placed himself to photograph it, incorporating peculiarly eloquent backgrounds and surroundings.
I’m looking forward to seeing this one…
Nice piece by Sam Dolnick in the Times yesterday about a paltry tribute to Thurman Munson:
Thurman Munson’s widow, Diana, has never been to Thurman Munson Way, but she said that her husband would have appreciated the street’s low profile.
“He wasn’t about the big superhighway and mainstream streets,” she said. “It fits his personality so much more that it would be an out-of-the-way street and be something that not a lot of people would embrace.”
“After 30 years,” she said, “he would just be pleased that they’re still talking about him.”
It remains unclear exactly why this street was chosen to honor Munson. Henry J. Stern, who was a member of the City Council’s parks committee when the honor was bestowed in 1979, could not recall the exact circumstances. But he said it was probably chosen because it was reasonably close to Yankee Stadium.
If you’ve been married for any length of time, you know you have to choose your battles. You rent the romantic comedy instead of the Tarantino flick, you hang the picture in the hallway during halftime of the football game, and you smile when she asks to share your dessert. You have to draw the line somewhere, though, and it seems like most of us take our stand with the comfort items. It could be a beat up chair, a worn pair of jeans, or an old pair of shoes.
Andy Pettitte is an old pair of shoes. He’s been doing this so long that it’s expected and surprising all at the same time. Sure, the stubble on the jaw is a gun-metal grey now, and his three-year business trip to Houston kind of puts an asterisk on Michael Kay’s constant references to the Core Four, but this is still Andy Pettitte. So when he rattled off eight effective innings on Sunday afternoon in the Bronx, Pettitte looked just like the guy we saw back in 2009 or 2003 or 1996.
He allowed two runs in the third inning on a single, a sacrifice, a double, and another single, but he was coldly effective the rest of the way. He walked Ryan Garko with one out in the fourth, then settled in to retire the next twelve Texas hitters, highlighted by the sixth and seventh innings when he needed only fifteen pitches total to record the six outs.
On the other side of the efficiency coin was Texas starter Rich Harden. Harden’s been on my fantasy team for the past couple seasons, so I’ve seen this game about a thousand times. His stuff is great, far better than Pettitte’s, so he was able to strike out five hitters in only three and two-thirds innings, but the the problem was that he also gave up six walks and five base hits. The strikeouts and walks would naturally lead to a high pitch count, but here’s a hidden stat that doomed Harden: Yankee hitters fouled off 22 of his pitches; Ranger batters managed only three foul balls during Pettitte’s eight innings.
Meanwhile, the Yankees cobbled together five runs with a sacrifice fly here, a bloop single there, and a couple of home runs, only one of which is interesting enough to talk about here. The struggling Mark Teixeira hit his first home run of the season, and as he rounded the bases in his usual high-stepping trot, looking like a man running through three feet of snow, I wondered if he might finally be coming around. I know we all know that Teixeira starts slowly, but just as a reminder, I looked it up. Take a look at where he was on the morning of April 19th in each the past several years. (And to make you feel better, I’ve included his finishing slash stats as well.)
2003: .149/.216/.298 — .259/.331/.480
2004: Injured in April — .281/.370/.560
2005: .224/.308/.397 — .301/.379/.575
2006: .321/.410/.528 — .282/.371/.514
2007: .204/.339/.224 — .306/.400/.563
2008: .203/.282/.375 — .308/.410/.552
2009: .194/.333/.548 — .292/.383/.565
2010: .114/.291/.205 — ????/????/????
The numbers don’t lie. Sooner or later, he’ll be fine. The hitters say that sometimes one swing is all it takes to find what’s been missing; here’s hoping that Big Tex has found it. But back to our game…
Everything ended when another pair of comfortable shoes, Mariano Rivera, trotted in from the dugout and closed things out with a spotless ninth inning. Yankees 5, Rangers 2. As noted everywhere, the Yanks have won their first four series, the first time that’s happened since 1926, and all is happy in the Bronx.