<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Section	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2013/05/06/the-section/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2013/05/06/the-section/</link>
	<description>Bronx Banter Blog, Served Fresh Daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Blankman		</title>
		<link>https://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2013/05/06/the-section/#comment-304458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Blankman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=102187#comment-304458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[3] They worked on some records I adore and others I can take or leave, frankly, but their work was always first rate. Since they were the top dogs in 1970s LA, they got pigeon holed for &quot;soft&quot; stuff, but they could/can play anything.  The stories are pretty nutso, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[3] They worked on some records I adore and others I can take or leave, frankly, but their work was always first rate. Since they were the top dogs in 1970s LA, they got pigeon holed for &#8220;soft&#8221; stuff, but they could/can play anything.  The stories are pretty nutso, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Belth		</title>
		<link>https://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2013/05/06/the-section/#comment-304457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Belth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=102187#comment-304457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1) I don&#039;t know much about the records these guys worked on but I like their approach that their musicianship is about serving the story of the song.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I don&#8217;t know much about the records these guys worked on but I like their approach that their musicianship is about serving the story of the song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chyll Will		</title>
		<link>https://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2013/05/06/the-section/#comment-304455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chyll Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=102187#comment-304455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had accidently found a playlist on Youtube for the Funk Brothers; highlighting the music they did for Motown and such by playing mostly instrumentals of well known tracks. It&#039;s incredible the amount of craft that goes into something that is supposed to be in the background and support the singer(s). That&#039;s largely what&#039;s missing from much of today&#039;s music; the lack of support in what is mainly programmed soundscapes that often overshadow the song itself. I think &lt;i&gt;MTV Unplugged&lt;/i&gt; tried to address that indirectly at some point (but naturally the novelty of hearing an act sing or rap to acoustic versions of their studio songs smushed that aspect of it) and often live concerts expose the superficiality of the acts themselves unless they were a performing band to begin with. 

Now this is not an indictment of what we like to call Golden Age Hip-Hop because of the use (and sometimes overuse) of samples; not at all. Sampling used to be an artform in that it creatively constructed genuine sounds from either well-known or obscure rhythms and such; the best of which gave renewed attention to their source. What I do object to is the rcycling of &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; and using it for the same purpose. 

I admit to being somewhat conflicted though when it comes to electronica as a appreciable form of music. While I love groups like Daft Punk and Kraftwerk for creating a soundscape type of music that stands on its own, I feel the synthesizing drums, strings, horns, etc comes with a big price: technique and appreciation of other forms that involve the physical craft work; i.e. practice and learning notes, timing, etc. If you find it easy to replicate the sounds of R&#038;B or garage rock with your keyboard or Mac Pro, then there might be a large disconnect from the talent and craft, and therefore the appreciation for that it takes to create it when you don&#039;t have access to electricity, or for exploration of sound on the fly, or a million other possibilities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had accidently found a playlist on Youtube for the Funk Brothers; highlighting the music they did for Motown and such by playing mostly instrumentals of well known tracks. It&#8217;s incredible the amount of craft that goes into something that is supposed to be in the background and support the singer(s). That&#8217;s largely what&#8217;s missing from much of today&#8217;s music; the lack of support in what is mainly programmed soundscapes that often overshadow the song itself. I think <i>MTV Unplugged</i> tried to address that indirectly at some point (but naturally the novelty of hearing an act sing or rap to acoustic versions of their studio songs smushed that aspect of it) and often live concerts expose the superficiality of the acts themselves unless they were a performing band to begin with. </p>
<p>Now this is not an indictment of what we like to call Golden Age Hip-Hop because of the use (and sometimes overuse) of samples; not at all. Sampling used to be an artform in that it creatively constructed genuine sounds from either well-known or obscure rhythms and such; the best of which gave renewed attention to their source. What I do object to is the rcycling of <i>that</i> and using it for the same purpose. </p>
<p>I admit to being somewhat conflicted though when it comes to electronica as a appreciable form of music. While I love groups like Daft Punk and Kraftwerk for creating a soundscape type of music that stands on its own, I feel the synthesizing drums, strings, horns, etc comes with a big price: technique and appreciation of other forms that involve the physical craft work; i.e. practice and learning notes, timing, etc. If you find it easy to replicate the sounds of R&amp;B or garage rock with your keyboard or Mac Pro, then there might be a large disconnect from the talent and craft, and therefore the appreciation for that it takes to create it when you don&#8217;t have access to electricity, or for exploration of sound on the fly, or a million other possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Blankman		</title>
		<link>https://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2013/05/06/the-section/#comment-304454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Blankman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/?p=102187#comment-304454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I caught this article the other day - terrific stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught this article the other day &#8211; terrific stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
