- Bronx Banter - http://www.bronxbanterblog.com -
Posted By Alex Belth On October 22, 2008 @ 5:32 am In Bronx Banter | Comments Disabled
According to Joel Sherman , major league executives believe that Atlanta is a likely destination for Jake Peavy. Eh. So long he doesn’t wind up in the AL East (i.e. Boston), right?
In a recent chat at ESPN , Buster Olney answered a Yankee question:
Dave (NY): I know you’ve said Cashman wouldn’t make Tex a priority. How do things stand on that front? I’d rather have CC myself.
Buster Olney: Dave — they’ll make him an offer they’re comfortable with — say, 6 years, $18 million a year — but they won’t sniff the 10/200 that has been rumored. If the Red Sox or Orioles take Teixeira much higher than the Yankees, I don’t think they’ll chase it. On the other hand, all bets are off when it comes to CC — they’ll go crazy to get him.
And wouldn’t you know it, but Rob Neyer also fielded a Yankee question in his latest chat :
Josh (NY): Cano and Kennedy for Matt Kemp? Yankees need a center fielder and reports say the Dodgers love Cano.
Rob Neyer: One sticking point: I’m not sure Kemp is a center fielder for much longer. I think he’s about to grow out of the position (if he hasn’t already). Also, do the Dodgers need another young starter? Can’t Jamie McDonald be that guy if they want one?
Who out there is bully on Tex? What about CC? I don’t know that either will end up in New York, but if I had to pick between the two, I’d guess that the Yankees have a better shot at Teixeira. Whadda ya think?
Article printed from Bronx Banter: http://www.bronxbanterblog.com
URL to article: http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/10/22/yentaville/
URLs in this post:
 Joel Sherman: http://www.nypost.com/seven/10222008/sports/moresports/peavy_may_be_headed_to_atlanta_134680.htm
 a recent chat at ESPN: http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=23137
 Rob Neyer also fielded a Yankee question in his latest chat: http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=23136
Copyright © 2011 Bronx Banter. All rights reserved.